Predicting interval and screen-detected breast cancers from mammographic density defined by different brightness thresholds

被引:18
|
作者
Nguyen, Tuong L. [1 ]
Aung, Ye K. [1 ]
Li, Shuai [1 ]
Nhut Ho Trinh [1 ]
Evans, Christopher F. [1 ]
Baglietto, Laura [1 ,9 ]
Krishnan, Kavitha [1 ]
Dite, Gillian S. [1 ]
Stone, Jennifer [3 ,4 ]
English, Dallas R. [1 ,2 ]
Song, Yun-Mi [5 ]
Sung, Joohon [6 ,8 ]
Jenkins, Mark A. [1 ]
Southey, Melissa C. [7 ,10 ]
Giles, Graham G. [1 ,2 ]
Hopper, John L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Epidemiol & Biostat, Level 3-207 Bouverie St, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia
[2] Canc Council Victoria, Canc Epidemiol & Intelligence Div, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Curtin Univ, Curtin UWA Ctr Genet Origins Hlth & Dis, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[4] Univ Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[5] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Family Med, Irwon Ro 81, Seoul 06351, South Korea
[6] Seoul Natl Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, 1 Gwanak Ro, Seoul 151742, South Korea
[7] Univ Melbourne, Dept Pathol, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia
[8] Seoul Natl Univ, Inst Hlth & Environm, 1 Gwanak Ro, Seoul 151742, South Korea
[9] Univ Pisa, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Pisa, Italy
[10] Monash Univ, Sch Clin Sci Monash Hlth, Precis Med, Clayton, Vic, Australia
来源
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH | 2018年 / 20卷
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
Breast cancer; Masking effect; Interval cancer; Screen-detected; Nested case-control cohort study; Australian women; Mammography; Mammographic density; TUMOR CHARACTERISTICS; RISK; ASSOCIATIONS; SIZE;
D O I
10.1186/s13058-018-1081-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundCase-control studies show that mammographic density is a better risk factor when defined at higher than conventional pixel-brightness thresholds. We asked if this applied to interval and/or screen-detected cancers.MethodWe conducted a nested case-control study within the prospective Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study including 168 women with interval and 422 with screen-detected breast cancers, and 498 and 1197 matched controls, respectively. We measured absolute and percent mammographic density using the Cumulus software at the conventional threshold (Cumulus) and two increasingly higher thresholds (Altocumulus and Cirrocumulus, respectively). Measures were transformed and adjusted for age and body mass index (BMI). Using conditional logistic regression and adjusting for BMI by age at mammogram, we estimated risk discrimination by the odds ratioper adjusted standard deviation (OPERA), calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and compared nested models using the likelihood ratio criterion and models with the same number of parameters using the difference in Bayesian information criterion (BIC).ResultsFor interval cancer, there was very strong evidence that the association was best predicted by Cumulus as a percentage (OPERA=2.33 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.85-2.92); all BIC >14), and the association with BMI was independent of age at mammogram. After adjusting for percent Cumulus, no other measure was associated with risk (all P>0.1). For screen-detected cancer, however, the associations were strongest for the absolute and percent Cirrocumulus measures (all BIC >6), and after adjusting for Cirrocumulus, no other measure was associated with risk (all P>0.07).ConclusionThe amount of brighter areas is the best mammogram-based measure of screen-detected breast cancer risk, while the percentage of the breast covered by white or bright areas is the best mammogram-based measure of interval breast cancer risk, irrespective of BMI. Therefore, there are different features of mammographic images that give clinically important information about different outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of analogue and digital mammographic appearances of screen-detected invasive breast cancers
    Jones, T. W.
    Bansal, G.
    Farmer, H.
    Orr, B.
    Russell, H.
    Hobson, I.
    Godden, D.
    Lyburn, I.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 13
  • [22] Re: Biologic characteristics of interval and screen-detected breast cancers - Response
    Phillips, KA
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2001, 93 (02) : 151 - 152
  • [23] AGGRESSIVENESS OF SCREEN-DETECTED BREAST CANCERS
    HAKAMA, M
    HOLLI, K
    ISOLA, J
    KALLIONIEMI, OP
    KARKKAINEN, A
    VISAKORPI, T
    PUKKALA, E
    SAARENMAA, I
    GEIGER, U
    IKKALA, J
    NIEMINEN, T
    GODENHJELM, K
    KOIVULA, T
    LANCET, 1995, 345 (8944): : 221 - 224
  • [24] A radiological and pathological analysis of screen-detected and interval-detected breast cancers in Belfast
    Malloy, J.
    Hennell, C.
    Bamford, L.
    Lowry, K.
    Tong, L.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 14
  • [25] A radiological and pathological analysis of screen-detected and interval-detected breast cancers in Belfast
    J Malloy
    C Hennell
    L Bamford
    K Lowry
    L Tong
    Breast Cancer Research, 14
  • [26] HER2 Status as Predictor of Mammographic Screening Detection: Comparison of Interval-and Screen-Detected Breast Cancers
    Musolino, A.
    Michiara, M.
    Conti, G. M.
    Boggiani, D.
    Bozzani, F.
    Zatelli, M.
    Sgargi, P.
    Ardizzoni, A.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 70
  • [27] HER2 STATUS AS PREDICTOR OF MAMMOGRAPHIC SCREENING DETECTION: COMPARISON OF INTERVAL- AND SCREEN-DETECTED BREAST CANCERS
    Musolino, A.
    Michiara, M.
    Conti, G. M.
    Boggiani, D.
    Bozzani, F.
    Zatelli, M.
    Sgargi, P.
    Ardizzoni, A.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2010, 21 : 78 - 79
  • [28] Interval breast cancers have worse tumor characteristics and survival compared to screen-detected breast cancers
    de Munck, L.
    Siesling, S.
    Pijnappel, R. M.
    van der Vegt, B.
    de Bock, G. H.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 76
  • [29] Trends in surgery for screen-detected and interval breast cancers in a national screening programme
    Nederend, J.
    Duijm, L. E. M.
    Louwman, M. W. J.
    Roumen, R. M. H.
    Jansen, F. H.
    Voogd, A. C.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 101 (08) : 949 - 958
  • [30] The operative management of screen-detected breast cancers
    Crawford, MD
    Biankin, AV
    Rickard, MT
    Coleman, MJ
    West, R
    Niesche, FW
    Renwick, SR
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 70 (03): : 168 - 173