Properties of IBA Razor Nano Chamber in small-field radiation therapy using 6MV FF, 6 MV FFF, and 10 MV FFF photon beams

被引:5
|
作者
Partanen, Mari [1 ,2 ]
Niemela, Jarkko [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Ojala, Jarkko [1 ,2 ]
Keyrilainen, Jani [3 ,4 ]
Kapanen, Mika [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tampere Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Unit Radiotherapy, POB 2000, FI-33521 Tampere, Finland
[2] Tampere Univ Hosp, Med Imaging Ctr, Dept Med Phys, Tampere, Finland
[3] Turku Univ Hosp, Dept Med Phys, Turku, Finland
[4] Turku Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol & Radiotherapy, Turku, Finland
[5] Univ Turku, Dept Phys & Astron, Turku, Finland
关键词
Small-field dosimetry; relative dosimetry; ionization chamber; Monte Carlo simulations; EGSnrc; MONTE-CARLO; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1080/0284186X.2021.1979644
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Small megavoltage photon fields are increasingly used in modern radiotherapy techniques such as stereotactic radiotherapy. Therefore, it is important to study the reliability of dosimetry in the small-field conditions. The IBA Razor Nano Chamber (Nano chamber) ionization chamber is particularly intended for small-field measurements. In this work, properties of the Nano chamber were studied with both measurements and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. Material and methods: The measurements and MC simulations were performed with 6MV, 6MV FFF and 10MV FFF photon beams from the Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator. The source-to-surface distance was fixed at 100cm. The measurements and MC simulations included profiles, percentage depth doses (PDD), and output factors (OF) in square jaw-collimated fields. The MC simulations were performed with the EGSnrc software system in a large water phantom. Results: The measured profiles and PDDs obtained with the Nano chamber were compared against IBA Razor Diode, PTW microDiamond and the PTW Semiflex ionization chamber. These results indicate that the Nano chamber is a high-resolution detector and thus suitable for small field profile measurements down to field sizes 2 x 2 cm(2) and appropriate for the PDD measurements. The field output correction factors K-Qclin,K- (f)(c)(l)(i)(n)(,)(fmsr)(Qmsr )( ) and field OFs Omega(Qclin,) (f)(c)(l)(i)(n)(,)(fmsr)(Qmsr )( ) were determined according to TRS-483 protocol In the 6MV FF and FFF beams, the determined correction factors K-Qclin,K- (f)(c)(l)(i)(n)(,)(fmsr)(Qmsr )( ) were within 1.2% for the field sizes of 1 x 1 cm(2)-3 x 3 cm(2) and the experimental and MC defined field output factors Omega(Qclin,) (f)(c)(l)(i)(n)(,)(fmsr)(Qmsr )( ) showed good agreement. Conclusion: The Nano chamber with its small cavity volume is a potential detector for the small-field dosimetry. In this study, the properties of this detector were characterized with measurements and MC simulations. The determined correction factors K-Qclin,K- (f)(c)(l)(i)(n)(,)(fmsr)(Qmsr )( ) are novel results for the NC in the TrueBeam fields.
引用
收藏
页码:1419 / 1424
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of Flattening Filter (FF) and Flattening-Filter-Free (FFF) 6 MV photon beam characteristics for small field dosimetry using EGSnrc Monte Carlo code
    Sangeetha, S.
    Sureka, C. S.
    [J]. RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2017, 135 : 63 - 75
  • [32] Dosimetry and Implementation of High-Dose Rate MLC-Based GRID Therapy Using a 6MV Flattened Filter Free (FFF) Photon Beam
    Dou, K.
    Lerma, F.
    Jacobs, M.
    Li, B.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [33] Liquid ionization chamber measurements of dose distributions in small 6 MV photon beams
    Dasu, A
    Lofroth, PO
    Wickman, G
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1998, 43 (01): : 21 - 36
  • [34] Evaluating the influence of 6 MV and 15 MV photon beams on prostate intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans
    Reham A.El Gendy
    Ehab M.Attalla
    Yasser M.Elkerm
    Ali Alfarrash
    [J]. Oncology and Translational Medicine, 2016, 2 (01) : 26 - 33
  • [35] Effects on Scattered Radiation Through Flattening Filter Free (FFF) IMRT at 6 and 10 MV Beam Energy
    Gauter, B.
    Schoenig, S.
    Jahnke, L.
    Lohr, F.
    Wenz, F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (03): : E613 - E613
  • [36] Determination of the small-field output factor for 6 MV photon beam using EGSnrc Monte Carlo
    Chuah, K. W.
    Aziz, Abdul M. Z.
    Jayamani, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 47 (03) : 301 - 308
  • [37] Feasibility of linear diode array based small field data acquisition for 6 MV & 15 MV photon beams - An intercomparison with micro ion chamber
    Gul, Attia
    Kakakhel, M. Basim
    Amjad, Nauman
    Razzaq, Aasia
    Mirza, Sikander M.
    [J]. RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2019, 162 : 146 - 152
  • [38] Treatment of Large-Size Prostate Cancer Patients On An O-Ring Linac with 6MV FFF: Plan Quality Comparison with a C-Arm Linac Using 10MV Or 15MV Photons
    Liu, B.
    Cheng, C.
    Wang, X.
    Zhu, J.
    Parikh, R.
    Nie, K.
    Yue, N.
    Zhang, Y.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)
  • [39] Measurement and comparison of head scatter factor for 7 MV unflattened (FFF) and 6 MV flattened photon beam using indigenously designed columnar mini phantom
    Ashokkumar, Sigamani
    Nambiraj, Arunai
    Sinha, Sujit Nath
    Yadav, Girigesh
    Raman, Kothanda
    Bhushan, Manindra
    Thiyagarajan, Rajesh
    [J]. REPORTS OF PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY AND RADIOTHERAPY, 2015, 20 (03) : 170 - 180
  • [40] Small Field Surface Doses for 6X and 10X Photon Beams - FFF versus FF
    Mynampati, D.
    Yaparpalvi, R.
    Clift, C.
    Tsai, S.
    Mah, D.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06)