Experimental evaluation of validity of simplified Monte Carlo method in proton dose calculations

被引:33
|
作者
Kohno, R
Takada, Y
Sakae, T
Terunuma, T
Matsumoto, K
Nohtomi, A
Matsuda, H
机构
[1] Univ Tsukuba, Inst Clin Med, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058575, Japan
[2] Univ Tsukuba, Proton Med Res Ctr, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058575, Japan
[3] Univ Tsukuba, Inst Appl Phys, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058573, Japan
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2003年 / 48卷 / 10期
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/48/10/303
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
It is important for proton therapy to calculate dose distributions accurately in treatment planning. Dose calculations in the body for treatment planning are converted to dose distributions in water, and the converted calculations are then generally evaluated by the dose measurements in water. In this paper, proton dose calculations were realized for a phantom simulating a clinical heterogeneity. Both dose calculations in the phantom calculated by two dose calculation methods, the range-modulated pencil beam algorithm (RMPBA) and the simplified Monte Carlo (SMC) method, and dose calculations converted to dose distributions in water by the same two methods were verified experimentally through comparison with measured distributions, respectively. For the RMPBA, though the converted calculations in water agreed moderately well with the measured ones, the calculated results in the actual phantom produced large errors. This meant that dose calculations in treatment planning should be evaluated by the dose measurements not in water but in the body with heterogeneity. On the other hand, the results calculated in the phantom, even by the less rigorous SMC method, reproduced the experimental ones well. This finding showed that actual dose distributions in the body should be predicted by the SMC method.
引用
收藏
页码:1277 / 1288
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Uncertainties in Monte Carlo-based absorbed dose calculations for an experimental benchmark
    Renner, F.
    Wulff, J.
    Kapsch, R-P
    Zink, K.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (19): : 7637 - 7653
  • [22] Fast Monte Carlo dose calculations for brachytherapy
    Rogers, DWO
    Yegin, G
    Taylor, RE
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 76 : S17 - S17
  • [23] Monte Carlo Dose Calculations for Radiobiology Studies
    Mahuvava, C.
    Esplen, N.
    Kry, S.
    Bazalova-Carter, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)
  • [24] Accuracy of Electron Monte Carlo Dose Calculations
    Vazquez, L.
    Hernandez, C. Huerta
    Calvo, O.
    Oddiraju, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E502 - E502
  • [25] Monte Carlo for radiation therapy dose calculations
    Siebers, J
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (06) : 1303 - 1303
  • [26] Monte Carlo calculations of dose profiles with the 'given profile" method and comparison with measurements
    Poudel, Suresh
    Kulshreshtha, Asita
    Abu Zakaria, Golam
    Hartmann, Guenther H.
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2023, 213
  • [27] A MACRO MONTE-CARLO METHOD FOR ELECTRON-BEAM DOSE CALCULATIONS
    NEUENSCHWANDER, H
    BORN, EJ
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1992, 37 (01): : 107 - 125
  • [28] Experimental Assessment of the Accuracy of a Semi-Empirical Model and a Monte Carlo System for Proton Dose Calculations for Highly Inhomogeneous Media
    Mohan, R.
    Mirkovic, D.
    Titt, U.
    Song, X.
    Li, H.
    Zhu, X.
    Chin, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06)
  • [29] Peregrine Monte Carlo dose calculations for radiotherapy using clinically realistic neutron and proton beams
    Cox, LJ
    Bohm, TD
    Chadwick, MB
    DeLuca, PM
    Siebers, JV
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR DATA FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL 59, PT 1 AND 2, 1997, 59 : 1693 - 1699
  • [30] pGPUMCD: an efficient GPU-based Monte Carlo code for accurate proton dose calculations
    Maneval, Daniel
    Ozell, Benoit
    Despres, Philippe
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (08):