Monte Carlo calculations of dose profiles with the 'given profile" method and comparison with measurements

被引:1
|
作者
Poudel, Suresh [1 ]
Kulshreshtha, Asita [1 ,4 ]
Abu Zakaria, Golam [2 ]
Hartmann, Guenther H. [3 ]
机构
[1] Amity Univ Uttar Pradesh, Amity Sch Appl Sci, Lucknow Campus, Lucknow, India
[2] Univ Cologne, Klinikum Oberberg, Cologne, Germany
[3] German Canc Res Ctr, Heidelberg, Germany
[4] Amity Univ Uttar Pradesh, Amity Sch Appl Sci ASAS, Lucknow, India
关键词
Profile measurements volume averaging effect; Monte Carlo simulation particle source; DOSIMETRY; DETECTORS; CHAMBERS; SIZE;
D O I
10.1016/j.radphyschem.2023.111236
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Measurement of complex dose distributions which typically occur in modern radiation therapy methods is demanding. One of the main difficulties arises from the volume averaging effect due to the extended size of the employed dosimeter. Although small-sized detectors such as solid state detectors are obviously best suited in such situations, ionization chambers are frequently used. The question then arises whether the volume averaging effect plays such a role that it must be taken into account. In this work a procedure is presented which can answer this question and offer correction factors if needed. The new method of this work is based on the Monte Carlo tool for dose calculations and was applied at profile measurements. It is using the 'Given Profile' procedure and enables a comparison between profiles in a water phantom in a chamber-free geometry (true profiles) and measured profiles. Based on this procedure a specific inair profile was obtained which was then commonly applied as a new input source option at all measured depths. The calculated profile data simulating a measurement with the PTW Semiflex chamber well agreed with corresponding measurements at all depths. The identical source model also yielded profile data for the chamberfree geometry. The comparison between calculated chamber-free data and measured data clearly demonstrates that a volume averaging effect indeed occurs in the field edge region for this type of a mid-sized ionization chamber. The ratio of these data gives values in the order of 1.1 inside the field edges and values between 0.4 and 0.8 outside. The method presented in this work, although connected with the known effort of the Monte Carlo tool for dose calculations, is well feasible and results in meaningful data with respect to chamber-free profile data in water. It was shown, that the volume averaging effect plays a role at profile measurements with the Semiflex chamber. The ratio between calculated chamber-free data and measured data can be used as a correction factor to obtain the true profiles in water. It is suggested that the 'Given Profile' method could be additionally included in the existing choice of source options in codes of the EGSnrc system.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of treatment planning dose calculations with measurements and Monte Carlo calculations in a RANDO phantom
    Wyatt, M
    Corredor, C
    Tamimi, M
    Miller, LF
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2005, 116 (1-4) : 461 - 465
  • [2] COMPARISON OF FIELD DOSE-RATE MEASUREMENTS AND MONTE-CARLO CALCULATIONS
    KOBLINGER, L
    NEMETH, I
    ZOMBORI, P
    ANDRASI, A
    ACTA PHYSICA ACADEMIAE SCIENTIARUM HUNGARICAE, 1982, 52 (3-4): : 397 - 404
  • [3] COMPARISON OF ONETRAN CALCULATIONS OF ELECTRON BEAM DOSE PROFILES WITH MONTE CARLO AND EXPERIMENT.
    Garth, J.C.
    Woolf, S.
    IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 1987, NS-34 (06)
  • [4] COMPARISON OF ONETRAN CALCULATIONS OF ELECTRON-BEAM DOSE PROFILES WITH MONTE-CARLO AND EXPERIMENT
    GARTH, JC
    WOOLF, S
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 1987, 34 (06) : 1551 - 1556
  • [5] ABSORBED DOSE MEASUREMENTS AT AN 800 GEV PROTON ACCELERATOR - COMPARISON WITH MONTE-CARLO CALCULATIONS
    COSSAIRT, JD
    BUTALA, SW
    GERARDI, MA
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 1985, 238 (2-3): : 504 - 508
  • [6] ABSORBED DOSE MEASUREMENTS AT AN 800 GEV PROTON ACCELERATOR - COMPARISON WITH MONTE-CARLO CALCULATIONS
    COSSAIRT, JD
    BUTALA, SW
    GERARDI, MA
    HEALTH PHYSICS, 1985, 49 (01): : 153 - 153
  • [7] COMPARISON OF MONTE CARLO BETA DOSE CALCULATIONS FOR POLYSTYRENE WITH EXPERIMENT
    MIKHAIL, SZ
    ANNO, GH
    JORDAN, TM
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1969, 12 (02): : 935 - &
  • [8] Comparison of conventional and Monte Carlo dose calculations for prostate treatments
    Fraser, D.
    Mark, C.
    Cury, F.
    Chang, A.
    Verhaegen, F.
    INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON MONTE CARLO TECHNIQUES IN RADIOTHERAPY DELIVERY AND VERIFICATION - THIRD MCGILL INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP, 2008, 102
  • [9] Electron Monte Carlo Comparison to Hand Calculations and Phantom Measurements
    Chu, K.
    Potari, V.
    Rostock, R.
    DeLuca, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E250 - E250
  • [10] Monte Carlo dose calculations in homogeneous media and at interfaces: A comparison between GEPTS, EGSnrc, MCNP, and measurements
    Chibani, O
    Li, XA
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (05) : 835 - 847