Repeat cesarean section in subsequent gestation of women from a birth cohort in Brazil

被引:16
|
作者
Mascarello, Keila Cristina [1 ,2 ]
Matijasevich, Alicia [3 ]
Barros, Aluisio J. D. [1 ]
Santos, Ina S. [1 ]
Zandonade, Eliana [4 ]
Silveira, Mariangela Freitas [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Pelotas, Ctr Epidemiol Res, Postgrad Program Epidemiol, Pelotas, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Espirito Santo, Healthcare Sci Dept, Sao Mateus, Espirito Santo, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Prevent Med, Sch Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Espirito Santo, Postgrad Program Publ Hlth, Vitoria, Espirito Santo, Brazil
[5] Univ Fed Pelotas, Maternal & Child Dept, Sch Med, Pelotas, RS, Brazil
来源
REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH | 2017年 / 14卷
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
Cesarean section; Natural childbirth; Trial of labor; DELIVERY; EQUITY; HEALTH; TRIAL; LABOR; CARE;
D O I
10.1186/s12978-017-0356-8
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The current literature indicates increasing concern regarding the number of safe cesarean sections which a woman can undergo, mainly in face of the high cesarean section rates, which are growing in Brazil and worldwide. Aimed to describe the prevalence and associated factors of repeat cesarean section in a cohort of Brazilian women who had a cesarean section in the first birth. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study using data from the 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort. The sample included 480 women who had their first delivery in 2004, regardless of the form of delivery, and who had a second delivery identified in the cohort's follow-ups (in 2005, 2006, 2008, and 2010). Descriptive, bivariate and multivariate analyses using Poisson regression with robust error variance were carried out. Results: Among the women who underwent a cesarean section in their first delivery (49.47%), 87.44% had a second surgical delivery. The risk factors for repeat cesarean section included ages 21-34 (PR 1.67, CI 95% 1.07-2.60), not being seen by SUS (Public Healthcare System) in 2004 (PR 2.27, CI 95% 1.44-3.60), and the number of prenatal medical visits, i.e., women with ten or more visits were at 2.33 times higher risk (CI 95% 1.10-4.96) compared to those who had five or fewer visits. Conclusions: The proportion of cesarean sections both in the first and in the subsequent delivery is quite high. This high rate may compromise the reproductive future of the women who undergo consecutive cesarean sections with possible consequent complications and changes in care policies for pregnant women should be implemented.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Vaginal birth after cesarean section versus elective repeat cesarean delivery: Weight-based outcomes - Discussion
    Griffin, LP
    Stevens, C
    Curran, D
    Dierker, L
    Maurus, J
    Miller, J
    Carroll
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (06) : 1520 - 1522
  • [42] Blood transfusion following intended vaginal birth after cesarean vs elective repeat cesarean section in women with a prior primary cesarean: A population-based record linkage study
    Pont, Sarah
    Austin, Kathryn
    Ibiebele, Ibinabo
    Torvaldsen, Siranda
    Patterson, Jillian
    Ford, Jane
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 98 (03) : 382 - 389
  • [43] Maternal and perinatal outcomes of women with vaginal birth after cesarean section compared to repeat cesarean birth in select South Asian and Latin American settings of the global network for women’s and children’s health research
    Lester Figueroa
    Margo Harrison
    Manolo Mazariegos
    Shivaprasad Goudar
    Avinash Kavi
    Richard Derman
    Archana Patel
    Prabir Das
    Patricia L. Hibberd
    Sarah Saleem
    Farnaz Naqvi
    Robert L. Goldenberg
    Rashidul Haque
    Sk Masum Billah
    William A. Petri
    Elizabeth M. McClure
    Sylvia Tan
    Nancy F. Krebs
    Maternal Health, Neonatology and Perinatology, 9 (1)
  • [45] Association of birth by cesarean section with academic performance and intelligence in youth: A cohort study
    Ladelund, Agnes K.
    Slavensky, Julie A.
    Bruun, Frederik J.
    Sejer, Emilie Pi Fogtmann
    Mortensen, Erik Lykke
    Ladelund, Steen
    Kesmodel, Ulrik S.
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2023, 102 (05) : 532 - 540
  • [46] Birth by cesarean delivery and central adiposity in adolescents from a birth cohort
    Franca de Abreu, Joana D'Arc Matos
    Lucena de Abreu, Sterffeson Lamare
    Barbosa Martins Braganca, Maylla Luanna
    Pereira Cavalcante, Lilian Fernanda
    Teixeira da Cunha Franca, Ana Karina
    Costa Ribeiro, Cecilia Claudia
    Lamy Filho, Fernando
    CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2021, 37 (01):
  • [47] Cesarean birth and risk of obesity from birth to adolescence: A cohort study
    Dal'Maso, Elizandra
    Melo Rodrigues, Paulo Rogerio
    Ferreira, Marcia Goncalves
    Moreira, Naiara Ferraz
    Muraro, Ana Paula
    BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2022, 49 (04): : 774 - 782
  • [48] CESAREAN SECTION AND POSTPARTUM DEPRESSION IN A COHORT OF CHINESE WOMEN WITH HIGH CESAREAN DELIVERY RATE.
    Xie, R-H
    Lei, J.
    Wang, S.
    Xie, H.
    Walker, M.
    Wen, S. W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 173 : S150 - S150
  • [49] Trial of labor compared to repeat cesarean section in women with no other risk factors than a prior cesarean delivery
    Studsgaard, Anne
    Skorstengaard, Malene
    Glavind, Julie
    Hvidman, Lone
    Uldbjerg, Niels
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2013, 92 (11) : 1256 - 1263
  • [50] Predicting why women have elective repeat cesarean deliveries and predictors of successful vaginal birth after cesarean
    Mone, Fionnuala
    Harrity, Conor
    Toner, Brenda
    Mcnally, Aine
    Adams, Beverley
    Currie, Aoife
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2014, 126 (01) : 67 - 69