Repeat cesarean section in subsequent gestation of women from a birth cohort in Brazil

被引:16
|
作者
Mascarello, Keila Cristina [1 ,2 ]
Matijasevich, Alicia [3 ]
Barros, Aluisio J. D. [1 ]
Santos, Ina S. [1 ]
Zandonade, Eliana [4 ]
Silveira, Mariangela Freitas [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Pelotas, Ctr Epidemiol Res, Postgrad Program Epidemiol, Pelotas, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Espirito Santo, Healthcare Sci Dept, Sao Mateus, Espirito Santo, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Prevent Med, Sch Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Espirito Santo, Postgrad Program Publ Hlth, Vitoria, Espirito Santo, Brazil
[5] Univ Fed Pelotas, Maternal & Child Dept, Sch Med, Pelotas, RS, Brazil
来源
REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH | 2017年 / 14卷
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
Cesarean section; Natural childbirth; Trial of labor; DELIVERY; EQUITY; HEALTH; TRIAL; LABOR; CARE;
D O I
10.1186/s12978-017-0356-8
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The current literature indicates increasing concern regarding the number of safe cesarean sections which a woman can undergo, mainly in face of the high cesarean section rates, which are growing in Brazil and worldwide. Aimed to describe the prevalence and associated factors of repeat cesarean section in a cohort of Brazilian women who had a cesarean section in the first birth. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study using data from the 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort. The sample included 480 women who had their first delivery in 2004, regardless of the form of delivery, and who had a second delivery identified in the cohort's follow-ups (in 2005, 2006, 2008, and 2010). Descriptive, bivariate and multivariate analyses using Poisson regression with robust error variance were carried out. Results: Among the women who underwent a cesarean section in their first delivery (49.47%), 87.44% had a second surgical delivery. The risk factors for repeat cesarean section included ages 21-34 (PR 1.67, CI 95% 1.07-2.60), not being seen by SUS (Public Healthcare System) in 2004 (PR 2.27, CI 95% 1.44-3.60), and the number of prenatal medical visits, i.e., women with ten or more visits were at 2.33 times higher risk (CI 95% 1.10-4.96) compared to those who had five or fewer visits. Conclusions: The proportion of cesarean sections both in the first and in the subsequent delivery is quite high. This high rate may compromise the reproductive future of the women who undergo consecutive cesarean sections with possible consequent complications and changes in care policies for pregnant women should be implemented.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Elective repeat cesarean delivery in women eligible for trial of labor in Brazil
    Nakamura-Pereira, Marcos
    Esteves-Pereira, Ana Paula
    Gama, Silvana G. N.
    Leal, Maria
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2018, 143 (03) : 351 - 359
  • [32] The impact of prior preterm birth on subsequent prematurity in women with a twin gestation
    Sciscione, A
    Heinle, R
    Hoffman, M
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (04): : 9S - 9S
  • [33] Predicting cesarean section and uterine rupture among women attempting vaginal birth after prior cesarean section
    Smith, GCS
    White, IR
    Pell, JP
    Dobbie, R
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2005, 2 (09) : 871 - 878
  • [34] Trial of Labor After Two Cesarean Sections Versus Repeat Cesarean Section: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Horgan, Rebecca
    Hossain, Saif
    Fulginiti, Adriana
    Massaro, Robert
    Graebe, Robert
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 : 177S - 177S
  • [35] Vaginal birth after cesarean section versus elective repeat cesarean delivery: Weight-based outcomes
    Carroll, CS
    Magann, EF
    Chauhan, SP
    Klauser, CK
    Morrison, JC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (06) : 1516 - 1520
  • [36] VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN-SECTION - THE DEMISE OF ROUTINE REPEAT ABDOMINAL DELIVERY
    MARTIN, JN
    MORRISON, JC
    WISER, WL
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1988, 15 (04) : 719 - 736
  • [37] Maternal and neonatal complications in subsequent pregnancy after first birth cesarean section or vaginal delivery; a nationwide comparative cohort study
    Kok, Nienke
    Kazemier, Brenda
    Mol, Ben Willem
    Pajkrt, Eva
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 208 (01) : S74 - S74
  • [38] Variations in cesarean and repeated cesarean section rates in Brazil according to gestational age at birth and type of hospital
    Soares Dias, Barbara Almeida
    Leal, Maria do Carmo
    Esteves-Pereira, Ana Paula
    Nakamura-Pereira, Marcos
    CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2022, 38 (06):
  • [39] Cesarean Section and Postpartum Depression in a Cohort of Chinese Women with a High Cesarean Delivery Rate
    Xie, Ri-hua
    Lei, Jun
    Wang, Shuhong
    Xie, Haiyan
    Walker, Mark
    Wen, Shi Wu
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2011, 20 (12) : 1881 - 1886
  • [40] Is vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) or elective repeat cesarean safer in women with a prior vaginal delivery?
    Cahill, Alison G.
    Stamilio, David M.
    Odibo, Anthony O.
    Peipert, Jeffrey F.
    Ratcliffe, Sarah J.
    Stevens, Erika J.
    Sammel, Mary D.
    Macones, George A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 195 (04) : 1143 - 1147