Repeat cesarean section in subsequent gestation of women from a birth cohort in Brazil

被引:16
|
作者
Mascarello, Keila Cristina [1 ,2 ]
Matijasevich, Alicia [3 ]
Barros, Aluisio J. D. [1 ]
Santos, Ina S. [1 ]
Zandonade, Eliana [4 ]
Silveira, Mariangela Freitas [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Pelotas, Ctr Epidemiol Res, Postgrad Program Epidemiol, Pelotas, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Espirito Santo, Healthcare Sci Dept, Sao Mateus, Espirito Santo, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Prevent Med, Sch Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Espirito Santo, Postgrad Program Publ Hlth, Vitoria, Espirito Santo, Brazil
[5] Univ Fed Pelotas, Maternal & Child Dept, Sch Med, Pelotas, RS, Brazil
来源
REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH | 2017年 / 14卷
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
Cesarean section; Natural childbirth; Trial of labor; DELIVERY; EQUITY; HEALTH; TRIAL; LABOR; CARE;
D O I
10.1186/s12978-017-0356-8
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The current literature indicates increasing concern regarding the number of safe cesarean sections which a woman can undergo, mainly in face of the high cesarean section rates, which are growing in Brazil and worldwide. Aimed to describe the prevalence and associated factors of repeat cesarean section in a cohort of Brazilian women who had a cesarean section in the first birth. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study using data from the 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort. The sample included 480 women who had their first delivery in 2004, regardless of the form of delivery, and who had a second delivery identified in the cohort's follow-ups (in 2005, 2006, 2008, and 2010). Descriptive, bivariate and multivariate analyses using Poisson regression with robust error variance were carried out. Results: Among the women who underwent a cesarean section in their first delivery (49.47%), 87.44% had a second surgical delivery. The risk factors for repeat cesarean section included ages 21-34 (PR 1.67, CI 95% 1.07-2.60), not being seen by SUS (Public Healthcare System) in 2004 (PR 2.27, CI 95% 1.44-3.60), and the number of prenatal medical visits, i.e., women with ten or more visits were at 2.33 times higher risk (CI 95% 1.10-4.96) compared to those who had five or fewer visits. Conclusions: The proportion of cesarean sections both in the first and in the subsequent delivery is quite high. This high rate may compromise the reproductive future of the women who undergo consecutive cesarean sections with possible consequent complications and changes in care policies for pregnant women should be implemented.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Risk of Subsequent Preterm Birth After Second Stage Cesarean Section
    Qamaruddin, Arjumand Bano
    Hassani, Amal
    Ibrahim, Mohammed Jamal
    Abdelrahman, Safinaz
    Salman, Sara Abdul Hussain
    BAHRAIN MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2023, 45 (03) : 1640 - 1643
  • [22] Second stage cesarean section and the risk of preterm birth in subsequent pregnancies
    Offringa, Yvonne
    Paret, Louise
    Vayssiere, Christophe
    Parant, Olivier
    Loussert, Lola
    Guerby, Paul
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2022, 159 (03) : 783 - 789
  • [23] Predicting Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Section: A Cohort Study
    Tessmer-Tuck, Jennifer A.
    El-Nashar, Sherif A.
    Racek, Adrianne R.
    Lohse, Christine M.
    Famuyide, Abimbola O.
    Wick, Myra J.
    GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2014, 77 (02) : 121 - 126
  • [24] VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN - A COMPARISON OF MATERNAL AND NEONATAL MORBIDITY TO ELECTIVE REPEAT CESAREAN-SECTION
    ERIKSEN, NL
    BUTTINO, L
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 1989, 6 (04) : 375 - 379
  • [25] Vaginal birth after cesarean section in grand multiparous women
    Yamani Zamzami T.Y.
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2004, 270 (1) : 21 - 24
  • [26] Depression with postpartum onset: a prospective cohort study in women undergoing elective cesarean section in Brasilia, Brazil
    Zaconeta, Alberto Moreno
    Braz de Queiroz, Indara Ferreira
    Amato, Angelica Amorim
    Casulari da Motta, Lucilia Domingues
    Casulari, Luiz Augusto
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2013, 35 (03): : 130 - 135
  • [27] WHY WOMEN CHOOSE TRIAL OF LABOR OR REPEAT CESAREAN-SECTION
    MCCLAIN, CS
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 1985, 21 (03): : 210 - 216
  • [28] Severe recalled labor pain and elective cesarean section in a subsequent delivery: a cohort study of Norwegian parous women
    Junge, Carolin
    von Soest, Tilmann
    Seidler, Andreas
    Eberhard-Gran, Malin
    Garthus-Niegel, Susan
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2021, 100 (09) : 1678 - 1687
  • [29] Birth injury after cesarean section at 24 weeks of gestation: a large scalp laceration
    Shigeki Matsubara
    Rie Usui
    Yasunori Koike
    Akira Gomi
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2013, 287 : 617 - 618
  • [30] Birth injury after cesarean section at 24 weeks of gestation: a large scalp laceration
    Matsubara, Shigeki
    Usui, Rie
    Koike, Yasunori
    Gomi, Akira
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2013, 287 (03) : 617 - 618