Dexmedetomidine-ketamine and midazolam-ketamine combinations for sedation in pediatric patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a randomized prospective study

被引:32
|
作者
Koruk, Senem [1 ]
Mizrak, Ayse [1 ]
Gul, Rauf [1 ]
Kilic, Ertugrul [1 ]
Yendi, Fatih [1 ]
Oner, Unsal [1 ]
机构
[1] Gaziantep Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Reanimat, TR-27310 Sehitkamil, Gaziantep, Turkey
关键词
Dexmedetomidine; Sedation; ESWL; Pediatrics; TERM FOLLOW-UP; CARDIAC-CATHETERIZATION; CHILDREN; PROPOFOL; HUMANS; ANESTHESIA; PHARMACOKINETICS; VOLUNTEERS; ANALGESIA; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1007/s00540-010-1023-1
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) requires sedation in pediatric patients. Dexmedetomidine is a relatively new agent used for sedation. The aim of this randomized prospective study was to compare the effects of dexmedetomidine-ketamine and midazolam-ketamine combinations on the recovery time, hemodynamic and respiratory variables, and side effects in pediatric patients undergoing ESWL. Fifty pediatric patients aged between 2 and 15 years who were scheduled for elective ESWL were randomized into two groups. In Group D we applied dexmedetomidine at1 mu g/kg, given over 10 min, and a bolus of 1 mg/kg ketamine for sedation. In Group M we applied midazolam at a 0.05 mg/kg bolus dose 10 min before the procedure and a 1 mg/kg bolus of ketamine. We measured and monitored the hemodynamic variables, oxygen saturation, and recovery time, and we also monitored the side effects. Four patients in group D refused to complete the study; 21 patients in group D and 25 patients in group M completed the study. We found the recovery time [eye-opening time (9.3 +/- A 4.5 vs. 16.2 +/- A 6.5 min; p < 0.001), verbal response time (12.8 +/- A 4.9 vs. 19.2 +/- A 7.2 min; p < 0.001), and the cooperation time (17.1 +/- A 5.0 vs. 23.3 +/- A 7.7 min; p < 0.001)] to be shorter in the dexmedetomidine group. Also, the heart rate values were lower in the dexmedetomidine group at the 20th minute of the procedure (99.1 +/- A 19.0 vs. 118.7 +/- A 7.3 beats/min; p = 0.016). In this study we found the recovery time to be shorter, with hemodynamic stability, in the dexmedetomidine group, compared with the midazolam group. So we can conclude that dexmedetomidine may be a good and safe alternative agent for sedation, with a shorter recovery period than midazolam, in the pediatric population.
引用
收藏
页码:858 / 863
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ketamine-Propofol vs Ketamine-Dexmedetomidine Combinations in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Burn Dressing Changes
    Canpolat, Dilek Gunay
    Esmaoglu, Aliye
    Tosun, Zeynep
    Akin, Aynur
    Boyaci, Adem
    Coruh, Atilla
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & RESEARCH, 2012, 33 (06): : 718 - 722
  • [22] Comparative evaluation of intranasal midazolam, dexmedetomidine, ketamine for their sedative effect and to facilitate venous cannulation in pediatric patients: A prospective randomized study
    Abusinna, Rasha Gamal
    Algharabawy, Wael Sayed
    Mowafi, Marwa Mostafa
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2022, 38 (01): : 124 - 130
  • [23] Randomised, cross-over comparison of sevoflurane and ketamine-midazolam anaesthesia in children undergoing extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy
    Seden Kocabas
    Gulden Ugur
    Elvan Erhan
    Bulent Ozyar
    Oktay Nazli
    [J]. Advances in Therapy, 2008, 25 : 89 - 98
  • [24] Randomised, cross-over comparison of sevoflurane and ketamine-midazolam anaesthesia in children undergoing extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy
    Kocabas, Seden
    Ugur, Gulden
    Erhan, Elvan
    Ozyar, Bulent
    Nazli, Oktay
    [J]. ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2008, 25 (02) : 89 - 98
  • [25] Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam-ketamine for sedation during awake fibreoptic nasotracheal intubation in patients with difficult airway - a randomized, double-blind, comparative trial
    Ramalingam, Sivakumar
    Pappu, Ameya
    Ramachandran, Rashmi
    Kumar, Shailendra
    Trikha, Anjan
    Rewari, Vimi
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2021, 133 (3S_SUPPL): : 222 - 223
  • [26] The effect of dexmedetomidine-ketamine combination versus dexmedetomidine on behavior of uncooperative pediatric dental patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial
    El-Rouby, Sara Hassan
    Crystal, Yasmi O.
    Elshafie, Ahmed M.
    Wahba, Nadia A.
    El-Tekeya, Magda M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ORAL SCIENCE, 2024, 32
  • [27] Intranasal midazolam alone versus midazolam/ketamine combination for preoperative sedation in pediatric patients undergoing ophthalmic procedures: a randomized controlled trial
    Osama, Noha A.
    Mahmoud, Sara R.
    Salem, Abeer S.
    Tawfik, Dalia S.
    [J]. AIN SHAMS JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [28] Intranasal midazolam alone versus midazolam/ketamine combination for preoperative sedation in pediatric patients undergoing ophthalmic procedures: a randomized controlled trial
    Noha A. Osama
    Sara R. Mahmoud
    Abeer S. Salem
    Dalia S. Tawfik
    [J]. Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology, 14
  • [29] Comparative evaluation of dexmedetomidine and midazolam-ketamine combination as sedative agents in pediatric dentistry: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Malhotra, Parul Uppal
    Thakur, Seema
    Singhal, Parul
    Chauhan, Deepak
    Jayam, Cheranjeevi
    Sood, Ritu
    Malhotra, Yagyeshwar
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2016, 7 (02) : 186 - 192
  • [30] Randomized clinical trial on the efficacy of intranasal or oral ketamine-midazolam combinations compared to oral midazolam for outpatient pediatric sedation
    Sado-Filho, Joji
    Viana, Karolline Alves
    Correa-Faria, Patricia
    Costa, Luciane Rezende
    Costa, Paulo Sucasas
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (03):