Comparative evaluation of intranasal midazolam, dexmedetomidine, ketamine for their sedative effect and to facilitate venous cannulation in pediatric patients: A prospective randomized study

被引:4
|
作者
Abusinna, Rasha Gamal [1 ]
Algharabawy, Wael Sayed [1 ]
Mowafi, Marwa Mostafa [1 ]
机构
[1] Ain Shams Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesiol Intens Care & Pain Management, Cairo, Egypt
来源
EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA | 2022年 / 38卷 / 01期
关键词
Cannula insertion; dexmedetomidine; ketamine; midazolam; MOAA; S; PSAS; DOUBLE-BLIND; PREMEDICATION; CHILDREN; SCALE;
D O I
10.1080/11101849.2022.2033074
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background Sedative premedication has a great role to overcome fear and anxiety and to facilitate easy separation of children from their parents. The current study was designed to compare the effectiveness of intranasal midazolam, dexmedetomidine, and ketamine as sedatives to facilitate the intravenous cannulation before surgery in children. Methods The patients were classified into three groups. M group (midazolam), D group (dexmedetomidine), and K group (ketamine), each group received the intranasal drug 30 min before the procedure. The degree of sedation was documented using Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale (MOAA/S) at baseline and every 10 min till induction of anesthesia. The onset of sedation was documented when reaching MOAA/S of 5. Easiness of venipuncture and the degree of anxiety during parental separation were recorded using 4-point scales (Venipuncture score and Parental Separation Anxiety Scale, respectively). Results The cannula insertion was tolerated in the three groups, but the percent of patients in group D showed better conditions for cannula insertion as scored in venipuncture score. Group D showed better sedation level in MOAA/S. The time taken to reach MOAA/S of 4 (venipuncture time) was less in group D. Conclusion The study showed that using intranasal midazolam, dexmedetomidine, and ketamine facilitates the cannula insertion at the preoperative period, and they are safe and easy methods for sedation. The three drugs provided a satisfactory child-parent separation. However, intranasal dexmedetomidine provides statistically significant better conditions facilitating cannula insertion.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 130
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing the Sedative Effects of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine, Midazolam, and Ketamine in Outpatient Pediatric Surgeries: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Azemati, Simin
    Keihani, Maryam
    Sahmeddini, Mohammad Ali
    Nejad, Fatemeh Kanaani
    Dehghanpisheh, Laleh
    Khosravi, Mohammad Bagher
    Asmarian, Naeimehossadat
    [J]. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 49 (07) : 421 - 429
  • [2] A Comparative evaluation of Intrnasal Dexmedetomidine, Midazolam and Ketamine for their sedative and analgesic properties: A Triple Blind Randomized Study
    Surendar, Natarajan M.
    Pandey, Kumar R.
    Saksena, Kumar A.
    Kumar, R.
    Chandra, G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2014, 38 (03) : 255 - 261
  • [3] Comparative evaluation of intranasal midazolam-ketamine, dexmedetomidine-ketamine, midazolam-fentanyl, and dexmedetomidine-fentanyl combinations for procedural sedation and analgesia in pediatric dental patients: a randomized controlled trial
    Agarwal, Abhilasha
    Ansari, Afroz Alam
    Nath, Rajendra
    Chak, Rakesh Kumar
    Singh, Rajeev Kumar
    Khanna, Richa
    Singh, Prem Raj
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2023, 23 (02) : 69 - 81
  • [4] Comparative evaluation of dexmedetomidine and midazolam-ketamine combination as sedative agents in pediatric dentistry: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Malhotra, Parul Uppal
    Thakur, Seema
    Singhal, Parul
    Chauhan, Deepak
    Jayam, Cheranjeevi
    Sood, Ritu
    Malhotra, Yagyeshwar
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2016, 7 (02) : 186 - 192
  • [5] Dexmedetomidine–ketamine and midazolam–ketamine combinations for sedation in pediatric patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a randomized prospective study
    Senem Koruk
    Ayse Mizrak
    Rauf Gul
    Ertugrul Kilic
    Fatih Yendi
    Unsal Oner
    [J]. Journal of Anesthesia, 2010, 24 : 858 - 863
  • [6] Evaluation of the Sedative Effect of Midazolam with and Without Ketamine, by Subcutaneous Via in Pediatric Dental Patients
    Trejo-Herbert, Daniel
    Martinez-Rider, Ricardo
    Lara-Guevara, Javier
    Ruiz-Rodriguez, Socorro
    Garrocho-Rangel, Arturo
    Pozos-Guillen, Amaury
    Rosales-Berber, Miguel
    [J]. ODOVTOS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2018, 20 (01) : 89 - 97
  • [7] Efficacy and safety of intranasal midazolam versus intranasal ketamine as sedative premedication in pediatric patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Bingchen Lang
    Huiqing Wang
    Yuzhi Fu
    Linan Zeng
    Liang Huang
    Qianqian Zhang
    Shouming Chen
    Zhi-jun Jia
    Lingli Zhang
    [J]. BMC Anesthesiology, 22
  • [8] Efficacy and safety of intranasal midazolam versus intranasal ketamine as sedative premedication in pediatric patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lang, Bingchen
    Wang, Huiqing
    Fu, Yuzhi
    Zeng, Linan
    Huang, Liang
    Zhang, Qianqian
    Chen, Shouming
    Jia, Zhi-jun
    Zhang, Lingli
    [J]. BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [9] Effect of intranasal dexmedetomidine or intranasal midazolam on prevention of emergence agitation in pediatric strabismus surgery: A randomized controlled study
    Abdelaziz, Hesham Mohamed Mamdouh
    Bakr, Radwa Hamdi
    Kasem, Ayman A.
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 32 (03): : 285 - 291
  • [10] Comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine-midazolam, dexmedetomidine-ketamine, and midazolam-ketamine for premedication in paediatric patients: a double-blinded randomized trial
    Vaishnavi, B. D.
    Goyal, Shilpa
    Sharma, Ankur
    Kothari, Nikhil
    Kaloria, Narendra
    Sethi, Priyanka
    Bhatia, Pradeep
    [J]. ANAESTHESIOLOGY INTENSIVE THERAPY, 2023, 55 (02) : 103 - 108