Intranasal midazolam alone versus midazolam/ketamine combination for preoperative sedation in pediatric patients undergoing ophthalmic procedures: a randomized controlled trial

被引:1
|
作者
Osama, Noha A. [1 ]
Mahmoud, Sara R. [1 ]
Salem, Abeer S. [1 ]
Tawfik, Dalia S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Res Inst Ophthalmol, Anesthesia Dept, 2 El Ahram St, Giza, Egypt
关键词
Administration; Intranasal; Ketamine; Midazolam; Premedication; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; KETAMINE; PREMEDICATION; CHILDREN; ANESTHESIA; DEXMEDETOMIDINE; ANALGESIA;
D O I
10.1186/s42077-022-00212-7
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Interaction with medical providers is a stressful experience for a child. The current study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of intranasal midazolam alone versus midazolam/ketamine combination for preoperative sedation prior to ophthalmic procedures in preschool children. This randomized, controlled trial included male and female children (3 to 7 years old) who were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II, with either disability or special needs (such as autism or Down syndrome) or were undergoing multiple operative procedures. Participants were given either intranasal midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) or a combination of intranasal midazolam (0.25 mg/kg) and ketamine (1 mg/kg). Primary outcome measures were the preoperative level of sedation, agitation, and easiness of separation. Secondary outcomes included oxygen saturation and pulse rate. Any adverse effects, such as nausea and vomiting were reported. Results: The mean rank of the Six-point Pediatric Sedation Scale was significantly (p = 0.001) higher in the midazolam/ketamine group compared to the midazolam group (28.15 vs 18.85, respectively). The median pulse rate was significantly (p < 0.001) lower in the midazolam group than the combination group at 5, 10, 15, and 20 min after induction of anesthesia. Conclusions: These findings indicate that intranasal ketamine and midazolam combination produced better sedation than intranasal midazolam alone in preschool children prior to ophthalmic procedures. Moreover, ketamine and midazolam combination was safer with less incidence of bradycardia.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intranasal midazolam alone versus midazolam/ketamine combination for preoperative sedation in pediatric patients undergoing ophthalmic procedures: a randomized controlled trial
    Noha A. Osama
    Sara R. Mahmoud
    Abeer S. Salem
    Dalia S. Tawfik
    [J]. Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology, 14
  • [2] Comparison of intranasal midazolam versus intranasal ketamine for preoperative anesthetic sedation in pediatric patients
    Chouhan, Nandini
    Thatte, Janhavi
    Phalgune, Deepak
    Patkar, Charushila
    [J]. INDIAN ANAESTHETISTS FORUM, 2020, 21 (02): : 104 - 108
  • [3] Oral Midazolam-Ketamine versus Midazolam alone for Procedural Sedation of Children Undergoing Computed Tomography; a Randomized Clinical Trial
    Majidinejad, Saeed
    Taherian, Keramat
    Esmailian, Mehrdad
    Khazaei, Mehdi
    Samaie, Vajihe
    [J]. EMERGENCY, 2015, 3 (02): : 64 - 69
  • [4] Intranasal sedation using ketamine and midazolam for pediatric dental treatment (NASO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Gomes, Heloisa Sousa
    Miranda, Analya Rodrigues
    Viana, Karolline Alves
    Batista, Aline Carvalho
    Costa, Paulo Sucasas
    Daher, Anelise
    Morais Machado, Geovanna de Castro
    Sado-Filho, Joji
    Candido Vieira, Liliani Aires
    Correa-Faria, Patricia
    Hosey, Marie Therese
    Costa, Luciane Rezende
    [J]. TRIALS, 2017, 18
  • [5] Intranasal sedation using ketamine and midazolam for pediatric dental treatment (NASO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Heloisa Sousa Gomes
    Analya Rodrigues Miranda
    Karolline Alves Viana
    Aline Carvalho Batista
    Paulo Sucasas Costa
    Anelise Daher
    Geovanna de Castro Morais Machado
    Joji Sado-Filho
    Liliani Aires Candido Vieira
    Patrícia Corrêa-Faria
    Marie Therese Hosey
    Luciane Rezende Costa
    [J]. Trials, 18
  • [6] A double-blind randomized comparison of midazolam alone and midazolam combined with ketamine for sedation of pediatric dental patients
    Roelofse, JA
    Joubert, JJD
    Roelofse, PGR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1996, 54 (07) : 838 - 844
  • [7] DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF MIDAZOLAM ALONE AND MIDAZOLAM COMBINED WITH KETAMINE FOR SEDATION OF PEDIATRIC DENTAL PATIENTS
    ROELOFSE, JA
    JOUBERT, JJD
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 74 : 4 - 4
  • [8] Efficacy of intranasal ketamine and midazolam for pediatric sedation: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial
    Khoshrang, Hossein
    Alavi, Cyrus Emir
    Rimaz, Siamak
    Mirmansouri, Ali
    Farzi, Farnoush
    Biazar, Gelareh
    Atrkarroushan, Zahra
    Khadem, Nazanin Sabet
    [J]. CASPIAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 12 (04) : 539 - 543
  • [9] Randomized clinical trial on the efficacy of intranasal or oral ketamine-midazolam combinations compared to oral midazolam for outpatient pediatric sedation
    Sado-Filho, Joji
    Viana, Karolline Alves
    Correa-Faria, Patricia
    Costa, Luciane Rezende
    Costa, Paulo Sucasas
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (03):
  • [10] A randomized controlled trial on use of propofol alone versus propofol with midazolam, ketamine, and butarphanol for sedation during EUS
    Santosh, D.
    Mohan, R.
    Rajesh, G.
    Sandeep, L.
    Reddy, D. N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2010, 25 : A62 - A62