The value of the apparent diffusion coefficient value in the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018

被引:3
|
作者
Saleh, Gehad [1 ]
Razek, Ahmed Khalek Abdel [1 ]
El-Serougy, Lamiaa [1 ]
Shabana, Walaa [2 ]
El-Wahab, Rihame [1 ]
机构
[1] Mansoura Univ, Fac Med, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Mansoura, Egypt
[2] Mansoura Univ, Fac Med, Dept Trop Med, Mansoura, Egypt
关键词
liver cancer; hepatocellular carcinoma; abdominal MRI scan; diagnostic imaging; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; PROGNOSTIC PARAMETERS; CANCER; HEAD;
D O I
10.5114/pjr.2022.113193
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess role of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018 for the prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Material and methods: Retrospective analysis of 137 hepatic focal lesions in 108 patients at risk of HCC, who under-went magnetic resonance imaging of the liver. Hepatic focal lesions were classified according to LI-RADS-v2018, and ADC of hepatic lesions was calculated by 2 independent blinded reviewers. Results: The mean ADC of LR-1 and LR-2 were 2.11 +/- 0.47 and 2.08 +/- 0.47 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, LR-3 were 1.28 +/- 0.12 and 1.36 +/- 0.16 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, LR-4, LR-5 and LR-TIV were 1.07 +/- 0.08 and 1.08 +/- 0.12 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s and LR-M were 1.02 +/- 0.09 and 1.00 +/- 0.09 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s by both observers, respectively. There was excellent agreement of both readings for LR-1 and LR-2 (r = 0.988), LR-3 (r = 0.965), LR-4, LR-5 and LR-TIV (r = 0.889) and LR-M (r = 0.883). There was excellent correlation between ADC and LI-RADS-v2018 (r = -0.849 and -0.846). The cut-off ADC used to differentiate LR-3 from LR-4, LR-5, and LR-TIV were <= 1.21 and <= 1.23 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s with AUC of 0.948 and 0.926. Conclusions: Inclusion of ADC to LI-RADS-v2018 improves differentiation variable LI-RADS categories and can helps in the prediction of HCC.
引用
收藏
页码:E43 / E50
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018 for Primary Liver Cancer in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis on Enhanced MRI
    Liu, Xinai
    Ni, Xiaoyan
    Li, Yubo
    Yang, Chun
    Wang, Yi
    Ma, Chunzheng
    Zhou, Changwu
    Lu, Xin
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [42] Liver Imaging and Data System (LI-RADS) Version 2018 and Other Imaging Features in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma in Chinese Adults with vs. without Chronic Hepatitis B Viral Infection
    Liang, Ying-ying
    Shao, Shuo
    Kuang, Sichi
    Chen, Jingbiao
    Zhou, Jing
    He, Bingjun
    Zhang, Linqi
    Zhang, Yao
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Wang, Jin
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 2021
  • [43] Inclusion of apparent diffusion coefficient value in Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System improves accuracy of diagnosis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer
    Lyu, Q.
    Yang, X.
    Cao, Q.
    Liu, P.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S883 - S884
  • [44] Imaging features of hepatocellular carcinoma compared to intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and combined tumor on MRI using liver imaging and data system (LI-RADS) version 2014
    Horvat, Natally
    Nikolovski, Ines
    Long, Niamh
    Gerst, Scott
    Zheng, Jian
    Pak, Linda Ma
    Simpson, Amber
    Zheng, Junting
    Capanu, Marinela
    Jarnagin, William R.
    Mannelli, Lorenzo
    Do, Richard Kinh Gian
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 43 (01) : 169 - 178
  • [45] INCLUSION OF APPARENT DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT VALUE IN VESICAL IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM IMPROVES ACCURACY OF DIAGNOSIS OF MUSCLE-INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER
    Lyu, Qiang
    Yang, Xiao
    Cao, Qiang
    Liu, Peikun
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E862 - E862
  • [46] Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis of LR-5 in LI-RADS Version 2018 versus Revised LI-RADS for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Diagnosis
    Goins, Stacy M.
    Jiang, Hanyu
    van der Pol, Christian B.
    Salameh, Jean-Paul
    Lam, Eric
    Adamo, Robert G.
    McInnes, Matthew D. F.
    Costa, Andreu F.
    Tang, An
    Alhasan, Ayman S.
    Allen, Brian C.
    Reiner, Caecilia S.
    Clarke, Christopher
    Cerny, Milena
    Wang, Jin
    Choi, Sang Hyun
    Fraum, Tyler J.
    Ludwig, Daniel R.
    Song, Bin
    Joo, Ijin
    Kang, Zhen
    Kierans, Andrea S.
    Kim, So Yeon
    Kwon, Heejin
    Ronot, Maxime
    Podgorska, Joanna
    Rosiak, Grzegorz
    Song, Ji Soo
    Bashir, Mustafa R.
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 309 (03)
  • [47] Imaging features of hepatocellular carcinoma compared to intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and combined tumor on MRI using liver imaging and data system (LI-RADS) version 2014
    Natally Horvat
    Ines Nikolovski
    Niamh Long
    Scott Gerst
    Jian Zheng
    Linda Ma Pak
    Amber Simpson
    Junting Zheng
    Marinela Capanu
    William R. Jarnagin
    Lorenzo Mannelli
    Richard Kinh Gian Do
    Abdominal Radiology, 2018, 43 : 169 - 178
  • [48] Use of percutaneous imaging-guided biopsy for Liver Imaging and Reporting Data System (LI-RADS) observations: A retrospective study from two liver transplant centers
    Furlan, Alessandro
    Dasyam, Navya
    Buros, Christopher
    Thompson, Cole P.
    Minervini, Marta, I
    Kierans, Andrea Siobhan
    CURRENT PROBLEMS IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY, 2024, 53 (02) : 235 - 238
  • [49] Apparent Diffusion Coefficient to Subdivide Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging (BI-RADS-MRI) Category 4 Lesions
    Liu, Dandan
    Ba, Zhaogui
    Ni, Xiaoli
    Wang, Linhong
    Yu, Dexin
    Ma, Xiangxing
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2018, 24 : 2180 - 2188
  • [50] Common pitfalls when using the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS): lessons learned from a multi-year experience
    Cannella, Roberto
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Borhani, Amir A.
    Minervini, Marta I.
    Heller, Matthew
    Furlan, Alessandro
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 44 (01) : 43 - 53