The value of the apparent diffusion coefficient value in the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018

被引:3
|
作者
Saleh, Gehad [1 ]
Razek, Ahmed Khalek Abdel [1 ]
El-Serougy, Lamiaa [1 ]
Shabana, Walaa [2 ]
El-Wahab, Rihame [1 ]
机构
[1] Mansoura Univ, Fac Med, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Mansoura, Egypt
[2] Mansoura Univ, Fac Med, Dept Trop Med, Mansoura, Egypt
关键词
liver cancer; hepatocellular carcinoma; abdominal MRI scan; diagnostic imaging; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; PROGNOSTIC PARAMETERS; CANCER; HEAD;
D O I
10.5114/pjr.2022.113193
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess role of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018 for the prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Material and methods: Retrospective analysis of 137 hepatic focal lesions in 108 patients at risk of HCC, who under-went magnetic resonance imaging of the liver. Hepatic focal lesions were classified according to LI-RADS-v2018, and ADC of hepatic lesions was calculated by 2 independent blinded reviewers. Results: The mean ADC of LR-1 and LR-2 were 2.11 +/- 0.47 and 2.08 +/- 0.47 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, LR-3 were 1.28 +/- 0.12 and 1.36 +/- 0.16 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, LR-4, LR-5 and LR-TIV were 1.07 +/- 0.08 and 1.08 +/- 0.12 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s and LR-M were 1.02 +/- 0.09 and 1.00 +/- 0.09 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s by both observers, respectively. There was excellent agreement of both readings for LR-1 and LR-2 (r = 0.988), LR-3 (r = 0.965), LR-4, LR-5 and LR-TIV (r = 0.889) and LR-M (r = 0.883). There was excellent correlation between ADC and LI-RADS-v2018 (r = -0.849 and -0.846). The cut-off ADC used to differentiate LR-3 from LR-4, LR-5, and LR-TIV were <= 1.21 and <= 1.23 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s with AUC of 0.948 and 0.926. Conclusions: Inclusion of ADC to LI-RADS-v2018 improves differentiation variable LI-RADS categories and can helps in the prediction of HCC.
引用
收藏
页码:E43 / E50
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 1 and version 2 and combination with apparent diffusion coefficient as a predictor of biopsy outcome
    Ryznarova, Zuzana
    Keller, Jiri
    Zalesky, Miroslav
    Zachoval, Roman
    Capek, Vaclav
    Malikova, Hana
    NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY LETTERS, 2019, 40 (01) : 41 - 50
  • [22] Liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018: Reliability and agreement for assessing hepatocellular carcinoma locoregional treatment response
    Abdelrahman, Ahmed S.
    Ekladious, Mena E. Y.
    Badran, Ethar M.
    Madkour, Sherihan S.
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2022, 103 (11) : 524 - 534
  • [23] Use of gadoxetate disodium in patients with chronic liver disease and its implications for liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS)
    Chernyak, Victoria
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Heiken, Jay P.
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2019, 49 (05) : 1236 - 1252
  • [24] Exploring the feasibility of ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system (US LI-RADS) and visualisation score in clinical application
    Seng, Dorothy
    Low, Albert
    Afif, Azizah
    Lau, Denise
    Simin, Teo
    Chang, Pei-Yuan
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2024, 80 : S637 - S637
  • [25] Diagnostic accuracy of prospective application of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) in gadoxetate-enhanced MRI
    Kim, Yeun-Yoon
    An, Chansik
    Kim, Sungwon
    Kim, Myeong-Jin
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (05) : 2038 - 2046
  • [26] Diagnostic accuracy of prospective application of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) in gadoxetate-enhanced MRI
    Yeun-Yoon Kim
    Chansik An
    Sungwon Kim
    Myeong-Jin Kim
    European Radiology, 2018, 28 : 2038 - 2046
  • [27] Liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018: comparison between computed tomography and gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Nakao, Sei
    Tanabe, Masahiro
    Okada, Munemasa
    Furukawa, Matakazu
    Iida, Etsushi
    Miyoshi, Keisuke
    Matsunaga, Naofumi
    Ito, Katsuyoshi
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 37 (09) : 651 - 659
  • [28] Liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018: comparison between computed tomography and gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Sei Nakao
    Masahiro Tanabe
    Munemasa Okada
    Matakazu Furukawa
    Etsushi Iida
    Keisuke Miyoshi
    Naofumi Matsunaga
    Katsuyoshi Ito
    Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2019, 37 : 651 - 659
  • [29] Application of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) in FDG PET-MRI for Cirrhotic and Metastatic Cancer Patients
    Franceschi, Ana
    DeSantis, Mark
    Safaie, Elham
    Matthews, Robert
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2017, 58
  • [30] AUTOMATING LIVER REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM (LI-RADS) TO CLASSIFY HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
    Curtis, H. R.
    Jin, J.
    Christie, M.
    Wilding, A.
    Villamor, S.
    Park, J.
    Beaven, A.
    Smith, T.
    Jin, D.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2023, 71 (01) : NP459 - NP459