The value of the apparent diffusion coefficient value in the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018

被引:3
|
作者
Saleh, Gehad [1 ]
Razek, Ahmed Khalek Abdel [1 ]
El-Serougy, Lamiaa [1 ]
Shabana, Walaa [2 ]
El-Wahab, Rihame [1 ]
机构
[1] Mansoura Univ, Fac Med, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Mansoura, Egypt
[2] Mansoura Univ, Fac Med, Dept Trop Med, Mansoura, Egypt
关键词
liver cancer; hepatocellular carcinoma; abdominal MRI scan; diagnostic imaging; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; PROGNOSTIC PARAMETERS; CANCER; HEAD;
D O I
10.5114/pjr.2022.113193
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess role of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018 for the prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Material and methods: Retrospective analysis of 137 hepatic focal lesions in 108 patients at risk of HCC, who under-went magnetic resonance imaging of the liver. Hepatic focal lesions were classified according to LI-RADS-v2018, and ADC of hepatic lesions was calculated by 2 independent blinded reviewers. Results: The mean ADC of LR-1 and LR-2 were 2.11 +/- 0.47 and 2.08 +/- 0.47 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, LR-3 were 1.28 +/- 0.12 and 1.36 +/- 0.16 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, LR-4, LR-5 and LR-TIV were 1.07 +/- 0.08 and 1.08 +/- 0.12 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s and LR-M were 1.02 +/- 0.09 and 1.00 +/- 0.09 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s by both observers, respectively. There was excellent agreement of both readings for LR-1 and LR-2 (r = 0.988), LR-3 (r = 0.965), LR-4, LR-5 and LR-TIV (r = 0.889) and LR-M (r = 0.883). There was excellent correlation between ADC and LI-RADS-v2018 (r = -0.849 and -0.846). The cut-off ADC used to differentiate LR-3 from LR-4, LR-5, and LR-TIV were <= 1.21 and <= 1.23 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s with AUC of 0.948 and 0.926. Conclusions: Inclusion of ADC to LI-RADS-v2018 improves differentiation variable LI-RADS categories and can helps in the prediction of HCC.
引用
收藏
页码:E43 / E50
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Expanding the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018 diagnostic population: performance and reliability of LI-RADS for distinguishing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from non-HCC primary liver carcinoma in patients who do not meet strict LI-RADS high-risk criteria
    Ludwig, Daniel R.
    Fraum, Tyler J.
    Cannella, Roberto
    Tsai, Richard
    Naeem, Muhammad
    LeBlanc, Maverick
    Salter, Amber
    Tsung, Allan
    Fleckenstein, Jaquelyn
    Shetty, Anup S.
    Borhani, Amir A.
    Furlan, Alessandro
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    HPB, 2019, 21 (12) : 1697 - 1706
  • [32] Value of CT and MR Imaging in Assessment of Loco-regional Ablated Hepatocellular Carcinoma using LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm (version 2018)
    Zarad, Carmen Ali
    Elagawy, Waleed
    Hasan, Basma Badreldin
    Abd-Elsalam, Sherief
    Shanab, Waleed Abo S.
    CURRENT CANCER THERAPY REVIEWS, 2023, 19 (03) : 260 - 270
  • [33] Tumor in vein (LR-TIV) and liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018: diagnostic features, pitfalls, prognostic and management implications
    Catania, Roberta
    Chupetlovska, Kalina
    Borhani, Amir A.
    Maheshwari, Ekta
    Furlan, Alessandro
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 46 (12) : 5723 - 5734
  • [34] Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (US LI-RADS) Visualization Score: a reliability analysis on inter-reader agreement
    Thodsawit Tiyarattanachai
    Kristen N. Bird
    Edward C. Lo
    Aladin T. Mariano
    Amanzo A. Ho
    Craig W. Ferguson
    Ranjit S. Chima
    Terry S. Desser
    Linda Nayeli Morimoto
    Aya Kamaya
    Abdominal Radiology, 2021, 46 : 5134 - 5141
  • [35] Diagnostic Accuracy of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) for Hepatic Nodules in Cirrhotic Patients: A 2 year Retrospective Analysis
    Albrecht, Hana
    Gilroy, Richard
    Ash, Ryan
    O'Neil, Maura
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2016, 96 : 413A - 414A
  • [36] Characterization of liver nodules in patients with chronic liver disease by MRI: performance of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS v.2018) scale and its comparison with the Likert scale
    Andrea Esposito
    Valentina Buscarino
    Dario Raciti
    Elena Casiraghi
    Matteo Manini
    Pietro Biondetti
    Laura Forzenigo
    La radiologia medica, 2020, 125 : 15 - 23
  • [37] Characterization of liver nodules in patients with chronic liver disease by MRI: performance of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS v.2018) scale and its comparison with the Likert scale
    Esposito, Andrea
    Buscarino, Valentina
    Raciti, Dario
    Casiraghi, Elena
    Manini, Matteo
    Biondetti, Pietro
    Forzenigo, Laura
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2020, 125 (01): : 15 - 23
  • [38] Diagnostic Accuracy of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) for Hepatic Nodules in Cirrhotic Patients: A 2 year Retrospective Analysis
    Albrecht, Hana
    Gilroy, Richard
    Ash, Ryan
    O'Neil, Maura
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2016, 29 : 413A - 414A
  • [39] Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (US LI-RADS) Visualization Score: a reliability analysis on inter-reader agreement
    Tiyarattanachai, Thodsawit
    Bird, Kristen N.
    Lo, Edward C.
    Mariano, Aladin T.
    Ho, Amanzo A.
    Ferguson, Craig W.
    Chima, Ranjit S.
    Desser, Terry S.
    Morimoto, Linda Nayeli
    Kamaya, Aya
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 46 (11) : 5134 - 5141
  • [40] Tumor in vein (LR-TIV) and liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018: diagnostic features, pitfalls, prognostic and management implications
    Roberta Catania
    Kalina Chupetlovska
    Amir A. Borhani
    Ekta Maheshwari
    Alessandro Furlan
    Abdominal Radiology, 2021, 46 : 5723 - 5734