The value of the apparent diffusion coefficient value in the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018

被引:3
|
作者
Saleh, Gehad [1 ]
Razek, Ahmed Khalek Abdel [1 ]
El-Serougy, Lamiaa [1 ]
Shabana, Walaa [2 ]
El-Wahab, Rihame [1 ]
机构
[1] Mansoura Univ, Fac Med, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Mansoura, Egypt
[2] Mansoura Univ, Fac Med, Dept Trop Med, Mansoura, Egypt
关键词
liver cancer; hepatocellular carcinoma; abdominal MRI scan; diagnostic imaging; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; PROGNOSTIC PARAMETERS; CANCER; HEAD;
D O I
10.5114/pjr.2022.113193
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess role of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018 for the prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Material and methods: Retrospective analysis of 137 hepatic focal lesions in 108 patients at risk of HCC, who under-went magnetic resonance imaging of the liver. Hepatic focal lesions were classified according to LI-RADS-v2018, and ADC of hepatic lesions was calculated by 2 independent blinded reviewers. Results: The mean ADC of LR-1 and LR-2 were 2.11 +/- 0.47 and 2.08 +/- 0.47 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, LR-3 were 1.28 +/- 0.12 and 1.36 +/- 0.16 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, LR-4, LR-5 and LR-TIV were 1.07 +/- 0.08 and 1.08 +/- 0.12 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s and LR-M were 1.02 +/- 0.09 and 1.00 +/- 0.09 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s by both observers, respectively. There was excellent agreement of both readings for LR-1 and LR-2 (r = 0.988), LR-3 (r = 0.965), LR-4, LR-5 and LR-TIV (r = 0.889) and LR-M (r = 0.883). There was excellent correlation between ADC and LI-RADS-v2018 (r = -0.849 and -0.846). The cut-off ADC used to differentiate LR-3 from LR-4, LR-5, and LR-TIV were <= 1.21 and <= 1.23 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s with AUC of 0.948 and 0.926. Conclusions: Inclusion of ADC to LI-RADS-v2018 improves differentiation variable LI-RADS categories and can helps in the prediction of HCC.
引用
收藏
页码:E43 / E50
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Version 2014
    Pecorelli, A.
    Nani, R.
    Sala, F.
    Pinelli, D.
    De Giorgio, M.
    Magini, G.
    Colledan, M.
    Fagiuoli, S.
    Sironi, S.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2017, 49 (01) : E49 - E49
  • [2] Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Version 2018: Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in At-Risk Patients
    Chernyak, Victoria
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Kamaya, Aya
    Kielar, Ania Z.
    Elsayes, Khaled M.
    Bashir, Mustafa R.
    Kono, Yuko
    Do, Richard K.
    Mitchell, Donald G.
    Singal, Amit G.
    Tang, An
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    RADIOLOGY, 2018, 289 (03) : 816 - 830
  • [3] Liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) version 2014: understanding and application of the diagnostic algorithm
    An, Chansik
    Rakhmonova, Gulbahor
    Choi, Jin-Young
    Kim, Myeong-Jin
    CLINICAL AND MOLECULAR HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 22 (02) : 296 - 307
  • [4] LI-RADS (Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System): Summary, Discussion, and Consensus of the LI-RADS Management Working Group and Future Directions
    Mitchell, Donald G.
    Bruix, Jordi
    Sherman, Morris
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 61 (03) : 1056 - 1065
  • [5] Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018: Review of the CT/MRI Diagnostic Categories
    Kanmaniraja, Devaraju
    Dellacerra, Gary
    Holder, Justin
    Erlichman, David
    Chernyak, Victoria
    CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2021, 72 (01): : 142 - 149
  • [6] LIVER IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM (LI-RADS) IN PATIENTS AT HIGH RISK FOR HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA
    McCullar, B. P.
    Appelbaum, A.
    Phillips, J. K.
    Weir, A.
    Waters, B.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 66 (02) : 416 - 416
  • [7] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS)
    Dietrich, Christoph F.
    Potthoff, Andrej
    Helmberger, Thomas
    Ignee, Andre
    Willmann, Juergen K.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 2018, 56 (05): : 499 - 506
  • [8] Interrater reliability and agreement of the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018 for the evaluation of hepatic lesions
    Abdelrahman, Ahmed S.
    Madkour, Sherihan S.
    Ekladious, Mena E. Y.
    POLISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 87 : E316 - E324
  • [9] Standardizing liver imaging reporting and interpretation: LI-RADS and beyond
    Rich, Nicole E.
    Chernyak, Victoria
    HEPATOLOGY COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 7 (07)
  • [10] Validation of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System 2017 (LI-RADS) Criteria for Imaging Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Kierans, Andrea S.
    Makkar, Jasnit
    Guniganti, Preethi
    Cornman-Homonoff, Joshua
    Lee, Michael J.
    Pittman, Meredith
    Askin, Gulce
    Hecht, Elizabeth M.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2019, 49 (07) : E205 - E215