Investigating stakeholder participation in UK agricultural robotics development

被引:1
|
作者
Ayris, Kirsten [1 ]
Dixon, Eliot [2 ]
Mauchline, Alice [1 ]
Rose, David Christian [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Reading, England
[2] Agri EPI Ctr, Roslin, Scotland
[3] Cranfield Univ, Cranfield, England
来源
FIRST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TRUSTWORTHY AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS, TAS 2023 | 2022年
关键词
agricultural robotics; responsible innovation; participation; stakeholder engagement; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1145/3597512.3597531
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
There are many environmental, economic, and social sustainability challenges facing the agricultural sector. One solution proposed to address such challenges is agricultural robotics, and in particular, autonomous systems for crop and livestock monitoring, disease management, and harvesting. However, several ethical challenges emerging from the potential use of agricultural robotics have been identified, leading to calls for responsible innovation of the technology. To examine how these ethical challenges are being addressed by the sector, it is important to understand how the responsible innovation principles of anticipation, inclusion, reflexivity, and responsiveness are being integrated into innovation of these robots. In this study, we focused on the principle of inclusion, conducting semi-structured interviews with key members of the UK agricultural robotics sector. A thematic analysis of the results showed inclusion of some stakeholder groups, the use of networks for stakeholder identification, and an emphasis on stakeholder engagement to facilitate developer education, technical specifications, and enduser confidence. However, the analysis also identified an absence of engagement with other stakeholder groups, and limited focus on stakeholder engagement to explore social and ethical issues. This study recommends a future focus on how inclusive anticipatory exercises could facilitate more responsible innovation of autonomous agricultural robotics.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Public and Stakeholder Participation for Managing and Reducing the Risks of Shale Gas Development
    North, D. Warner
    Stern, Paul C.
    Webler, Thomas
    Field, Patrick
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (15) : 8388 - 8396
  • [42] Subject-oriented Fog Computing: Enabling Stakeholder Participation in Development
    Stary, Christian
    Fleischmann, Albert
    Schmidt, Werner
    2018 IEEE 4TH WORLD FORUM ON INTERNET OF THINGS (WF-IOT), 2018, : 7 - 12
  • [44] A Conceptual Multi-criteria Mechanism for Stakeholder Participation in Urban Development
    Yang, Rebecca J.
    Elkadi, Hisham
    Jin, Xiaohua
    Zou, Patrick X. W.
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2011 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONSTRUCTION AND REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2011, : 779 - 783
  • [45] Sustaining multifunctional agricultural landscapes: comparing stakeholder perspectives in New York (US) and England (UK)
    Bills, N
    Gross, D
    LAND USE POLICY, 2005, 22 (04) : 313 - 321
  • [46] SMALL FARMER PARTICIPATION AND WORLD AGRICULTURAL-DEVELOPMENT
    OWENS, E
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 1976, 36 (02) : 142 - 148
  • [47] Getting key stakeholder participation
    Olshefsky, Jim
    Hugo, Joe
    Standardization News, 2003, 31 (06) : 18 - 21
  • [48] Integration of Haptics in Agricultural Robotics
    Megalingam, Rajesh Kannan
    Sreekanth, M. M.
    Sivanantham, Vinu
    Kumar, K. Sai
    Ghanta, Sriharsha
    Teja, P. Surya
    Reddy, Rajesh G.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATERIALS, ALLOYS AND EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS (ICMAEM-2017), 2017, 225
  • [49] Agricultural Robotics for Field Operations
    Fountas, Spyros
    Mylonas, Nikos
    Malounas, Ioannis
    Rodias, Efthymios
    Santos, Christoph Hellmann
    Pekkeriet, Erik
    SENSORS, 2020, 20 (09)
  • [50] PERSPECTIVES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ON THE ISLAND OF RHODES (GREECE): PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT
    Vagiona, D.
    Kyriakou, K.
    Sourianos, E.
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2013, 22 (7B): : 2182 - 2190