Investigating stakeholder participation in UK agricultural robotics development

被引:1
|
作者
Ayris, Kirsten [1 ]
Dixon, Eliot [2 ]
Mauchline, Alice [1 ]
Rose, David Christian [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Reading, England
[2] Agri EPI Ctr, Roslin, Scotland
[3] Cranfield Univ, Cranfield, England
来源
FIRST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TRUSTWORTHY AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS, TAS 2023 | 2022年
关键词
agricultural robotics; responsible innovation; participation; stakeholder engagement; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1145/3597512.3597531
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
There are many environmental, economic, and social sustainability challenges facing the agricultural sector. One solution proposed to address such challenges is agricultural robotics, and in particular, autonomous systems for crop and livestock monitoring, disease management, and harvesting. However, several ethical challenges emerging from the potential use of agricultural robotics have been identified, leading to calls for responsible innovation of the technology. To examine how these ethical challenges are being addressed by the sector, it is important to understand how the responsible innovation principles of anticipation, inclusion, reflexivity, and responsiveness are being integrated into innovation of these robots. In this study, we focused on the principle of inclusion, conducting semi-structured interviews with key members of the UK agricultural robotics sector. A thematic analysis of the results showed inclusion of some stakeholder groups, the use of networks for stakeholder identification, and an emphasis on stakeholder engagement to facilitate developer education, technical specifications, and enduser confidence. However, the analysis also identified an absence of engagement with other stakeholder groups, and limited focus on stakeholder engagement to explore social and ethical issues. This study recommends a future focus on how inclusive anticipatory exercises could facilitate more responsible innovation of autonomous agricultural robotics.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Introduction to symposium on rethinking farmer participation in agricultural development: development, participation, and the ethnography of ambiguity
    Glenzer, Kent
    Peterson, Nicole
    Roncoli, Carla
    AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES, 2011, 28 (01) : 97 - 98
  • [32] Stakeholder participation in agricultural research projects: a conceptual framework for reflection and decision-making
    Neef, Andreas
    Neubert, Dieter
    AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES, 2011, 28 (02) : 179 - 194
  • [33] Stakeholder participation in agricultural research projects: a conceptual framework for reflection and decision-making
    Andreas Neef
    Dieter Neubert
    Agriculture and Human Values, 2011, 28 : 179 - 194
  • [34] Regulator Reputation and Stakeholder Participation: A Case Study of the UK's Regulatory Sandbox for Fintech
    Fahy, Lauren
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RISK REGULATION, 2022, 13 (01) : 138 - 157
  • [35] Participation of UK dentists in continuing professional development
    Bullock, A
    Firmstone, V
    Fielding, A
    Frame, J
    Thomas, D
    Belfield, C
    BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2003, 194 (01) : 47 - 51
  • [36] Participation of UK dentists in continuing professional development
    A Bullock
    V Firmstone
    A Fielding
    J Frame
    D Thomas
    C Belfield
    British Dental Journal, 2003, 194 : 47 - 51
  • [37] Biodiversity and stakeholder participation
    Jones-Walters, Lawrence
    Cil, Aysegul
    JOURNAL FOR NATURE CONSERVATION, 2011, 19 (06) : 327 - 329
  • [38] Agricultural Robotics.
    Baylou, Pierre
    Monsion, Michel
    Bouvet, Christian
    Bousseau, Gerard
    Le Nouvel automatisme, 1982, 27 (28): : 54 - 63
  • [39] Agricultural Robotics and Automation
    van Henten, Eldert J.
    Tabb, Amy
    Billingsley, John
    Popovic, Marija
    Deng, Mingcong
    Reid, John
    IEEE ROBOTICS & AUTOMATION MAGAZINE, 2022, 29 (04) : 145 - 147
  • [40] UK Robotics Week
    Merrifield, Robert
    IEEE ROBOTICS & AUTOMATION MAGAZINE, 2017, 24 (02) : 17 - 17