Energy performance of an open-joint ventilated facade compared with a conventional sealed cavity facade

被引:69
|
作者
Sanjuan, Cristina [2 ]
Jose Suarez, Maria [1 ]
Gonzalez, Marcos [1 ]
Pistono, Jorge [1 ]
Blanco, Eduardo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oviedo, EDZE Energia, Gijon 33271, Asturias, Spain
[2] CIEMAT, Energy Efficiency Bldg Unit, Dept Energy, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
关键词
Ventilated facade; CFD; Energy-efficient building; Solar passive design; DOUBLE-SKIN FACADE; HEAT-TRANSFER; AIR-FLOW; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; THERMAL PERFORMANCE; NATURAL-CONVECTION; CFD SIMULATION; SOLAR; MODELS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.solener.2011.04.028
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The term "open-joint ventilated facades" refers to a building system in which coating material (metallic, ceramic, stone or composite) is hanged by means of a metallic-frame structure to the exterior face of the wall, creating an air cavity between wall and slabs. The coating material is placed in an arrangement of slabs and a series of thin joints from slab to slab to allow the surrounding air to enter and leave the cavity all along the wall. In addition to aesthetic and constructive reasons, the main interest in open joint ventilated facades is their ability to reduce cooling thermal loads. This is achieved by the buoyancy effect induced by solar radiation inside the ventilated cavity, where the air can enter or leave freely through the joints. This paper focuses on the phenomena produced on a typical open joint ventilated facade, and the comparison of its energy performance with that of a conventional sealed air cavity facade. The thermo fluid-dynamic behaviour of both systems has been analysed with CFD techniques and the results of the 3D simulations conclude that open-joint ventilated facades can help to achieve important energy savings in climates with hot summers and mild winters. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1851 / 1863
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Energy evaluation of an horizontal open joint ventilated facade
    Jose Suarez, Maria
    Sanjuan, Cristina
    Jose Gutierrez, Antonio
    Pistono, Jorge
    Blanco, Eduardo
    [J]. APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 37 : 302 - 313
  • [2] Performance of ventilated double-sided PV facade compared with conventional clear glass facade
    Han, Jun
    Lu, Lin
    Peng, Jinqing
    Yang, Hongxing
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2013, 56 : 204 - 209
  • [3] Energy performance of the opaque ventilated facade
    Fribar-Solaberrieta, E.
    Escudero-Revilla, C.
    Odriozola-Maritorena, M.
    Campos-Celador, A. .
    Garcia-Gafaro, C.
    [J]. 6TH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING PHYSICS CONFERENCE (IBPC 2015), 2015, 78 : 55 - 60
  • [4] Energy performance of a ventilated facade by simulation with experimental validation
    Aparicio-Fernandez, Carolina
    Vivancos, Jose-Luis
    Ferrer-Gisbert, Pablo
    Royo-Pastor, Rafael
    [J]. APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 66 (1-2) : 563 - 570
  • [5] Design and overall energy performance of a ventilated photovoltaic facade
    Yun, Geun Young
    McEvoy, Mike
    Steemers, Koen
    [J]. SOLAR ENERGY, 2007, 81 (03) : 383 - 394
  • [6] Closed cavity facade, an innovative energy saving facade
    Michael, Michalis
    Overend, Mauro
    [J]. BUILDING SERVICES ENGINEERING RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 43 (03): : 279 - 296
  • [7] Experimental analysis of grills configuration for an open joint ventilated facade in summertime
    De Masi, Rosa Francesca
    Festa, Valentino
    Gigante, Antonio
    Ruggiero, Silvia
    Vanoli, Giuseppe Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2022, 54
  • [9] Experimental assessment and modelling of the performance of an open joint ventilated facade during actual operating conditions in Mediterranean climate
    Giancola, E.
    Sanjuan, C.
    Blanco, E.
    Heras, M. R.
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2012, 54 : 363 - 375
  • [10] Energy performance of a ventilated double skin facade with PCM under different climates
    de Gracia, Alvaro
    Navarro, Lidia
    Castell, Albert
    Cabeza, Luisa F.
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2015, 91 : 37 - 42