Accuracy of Quantitative Computed Tomography Bone Mineral Density Measurements in Mandibles: A Cadaveric Study

PurposeThe aim was to investigate the accuracy of quantitative computed tomography bone mineral density (BMD) measurements in mandibles, comparing measured BMD with calibrated BMD. Materials and MethodsSeventy mandibles from adult cadavers were used. Twenty tomographic cuts were made in each mandible. In each tomographic cut, a region of interest was located, and the bone density was measured in Hounsfield unit (HU). A polymethyl methacrylate phantom containing four inserts of different predetermined densities (hydroxyapatite 100, 200, 500, and 700mg/cm(3)) was used to calculate calibrated bone density. Correlation between measured and calibrated bone densities was calculated. ResultsMean total correlation between measured and calibrated BMD in the 20 sagittal tomography cuts showed almost perfect positive correlation (r=0.998, p<.001). However, when average BMD measurements in HU were compared, the measured total BMD (in the 20 sagittal tomography cuts studied) was 54.99421.59, whereas the total calibrated BMD was 49.28 +/- 364.95, with statistically significant difference (p=.001). ConclusionsThere are discrepancies between measured and calibrated BMD; in this sense, a calibrated bone phantom with a predetermined mineral density should be used to determine the exact BMD before dental implants surgery.