Considerations and Methods for Usability Testing with Children

被引:1
|
作者
Andersen, Malene Hjortboe [1 ]
Khalid, Md. Saifuddin [1 ]
Brooks, Eva Irene [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Dept & Learning & Philosophy, Fac Humanities, Kroghstr 3, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
Child-computer interaction; Usability testing; Usability evaluation; Usability testing methods;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-55834-9_27
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
In this paper, the authors draw on methods used in the field of interaction design, emphasizing a user-centred design approach including methods such as usability testing, design metaphors, interview with users, video observations, focus groups, and think aloud sessions. However, a challenge of these methods is that they are designed for adults and are not necessarily appropriate to investigations including children. The guiding questions for this systematic literature review are (1) the motivation for conducting usability tests with children, and (2) the kind of methodological, practical, and ethical considerations that should be considered when involving children in usability studies. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist and PRISMA flow diagram are applied in order to assure the quality of the process of this investigation. Nine articles are analyzed and then synthesized by applying the constant comparative method. The synthesis of the literature review is based on the identified thematic priorities, which are categorized as follows: (1) the motivation for involving children as test persons in design processes, (2) definitions of usability, (3) practical considerations, (4) methodological considerations, and (5) ethical considerations.
引用
收藏
页码:228 / 238
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Usability-In-Place-Remote Usability Testing Methods for Homebound Older Adults: Rapid Literature Review
    Hill, Jordan R.
    Brown, Janetta C.
    Campbell, Noll L.
    Holden, Richard J.
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2021, 5 (11)
  • [32] Distributing usability - The implications for usability testing
    Vrazalic, L
    CONSTRUCTING THE INFRASTRUCTURE FOR THE KNOWLEGE ECONOMY: METHODS AND TOOLS, THEORY AND STRUCTURE, 2004, : 341 - 353
  • [33] A Review of Usability Evaluation Methods and Their Use for Testing eHealth HIV Interventions
    Davis, Rindcy
    Gardner, Jessica
    Schnall, Rebecca
    CURRENT HIV/AIDS REPORTS, 2020, 17 (03) : 203 - 218
  • [34] A Comparison of Laboratory and Synchronous Remote Usability Testing Methods Using AR
    Kim, Ted
    Choi, Young-Mi
    HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION: THEORETICAL APPROACHES AND DESIGN METHODS, PT I, 2022, 13302 : 252 - 263
  • [35] Accuracy, precision, usability, and cost of free chlorine residual testing methods
    Murray, Anna
    Lantagne, Daniele
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND HEALTH, 2015, 13 (01) : 79 - 90
  • [36] Application of Human Factors Methods: Usability Testing in the Radiation Oncology Environment
    Warkentin, H.
    Bubric, K.
    Giovannetti, H.
    Graham, G.
    Clay, C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3519 - 3519
  • [37] What Happened to Remote Usability Testing? An Empirical Study of Three Methods
    Andreasen, Morten Sieker
    Nielsen, Henrik Villemann
    Schroder, Simon Ormholt
    Stage, Jan
    CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2007, : 1405 - 1414
  • [38] A Review of Usability Evaluation Methods and Their Use for Testing eHealth HIV Interventions
    Rindcy Davis
    Jessica Gardner
    Rebecca Schnall
    Current HIV/AIDS Reports, 2020, 17 : 203 - 218
  • [39] Let Your Users Do the Testing: A Comparison of Three Remote Asynchronous Usability Testing Methods
    Bruun, Anders
    Gull, Peter
    Hofmeister, Lene
    Stage, Jan
    CHI2009: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 27TH ANNUAL CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-4, 2009, : 1619 - 1628
  • [40] Quantitative sensory testing: Clinical considerations and new methods
    Gracely, RH
    Eliav, E
    Hansson, P
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH WORLD CONGRESS ON PAIN, 2003, 24 : 589 - 600