Considerations and Methods for Usability Testing with Children

被引:1
|
作者
Andersen, Malene Hjortboe [1 ]
Khalid, Md. Saifuddin [1 ]
Brooks, Eva Irene [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Dept & Learning & Philosophy, Fac Humanities, Kroghstr 3, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
Child-computer interaction; Usability testing; Usability evaluation; Usability testing methods;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-55834-9_27
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
In this paper, the authors draw on methods used in the field of interaction design, emphasizing a user-centred design approach including methods such as usability testing, design metaphors, interview with users, video observations, focus groups, and think aloud sessions. However, a challenge of these methods is that they are designed for adults and are not necessarily appropriate to investigations including children. The guiding questions for this systematic literature review are (1) the motivation for conducting usability tests with children, and (2) the kind of methodological, practical, and ethical considerations that should be considered when involving children in usability studies. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist and PRISMA flow diagram are applied in order to assure the quality of the process of this investigation. Nine articles are analyzed and then synthesized by applying the constant comparative method. The synthesis of the literature review is based on the identified thematic priorities, which are categorized as follows: (1) the motivation for involving children as test persons in design processes, (2) definitions of usability, (3) practical considerations, (4) methodological considerations, and (5) ethical considerations.
引用
收藏
页码:228 / 238
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Usability Evaluation of iPekalonganKota with Different End-user Groups Using Usability Testing and USE Questionnaire Methods
    Febrianti, Sisca Ayu
    Adhy, Satriyo
    2021 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATICS AND COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCES (ICICOS 2021), 2021,
  • [42] Assessing the Usability of M-Health Applications: A Comparison of Usability Testing, Heuristics Evaluation and Cognitive Walkthrough Methods
    Alhadreti, Obead
    International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 2024, 15 (11) : 374 - 382
  • [43] Remote Research Methods: Considerations for Work With Children
    Shields, Michelle M.
    McGinnis, Morgan N.
    Selmeczy, Diana
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [44] A comparison of think-aloud, questionnaires and interviews for testing usability with children
    Donker, A
    Markopoulos, P
    PEOPLE AND COMPUTERS XVI- MEMORABLE YET INVISIBLE, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 305 - 316
  • [45] A Usability Testing of ASAH-i for Children with Speech and Language Delay
    Zaki, Nadia Akma Ahmad
    Wook, Tengku Siti Meriam Tengku
    Ahmad, Kartini
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND INFORMATICS (ICEEI'17), 2017,
  • [46] Usability Testing Practice at MIMOS Usability Lab
    Abdollah, Norfarhana
    Sivaji, Ashok
    Ghazali, Masitah
    HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION - INTERACT 2015, PT IV, 2015, 9299 : 628 - 629
  • [47] Cultural usability: The effects of culture on usability testing
    Shi, Qingxin
    Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 2007, Pt 2, Proceedings, 2007, 4663 : 611 - 616
  • [48] Usability testing for multimedia
    Tipton, Martha
    CD - ROM Professional, 1993, 6 (04):
  • [49] Integrated Usability Testing
    Ternauciuc, Andrei
    Vasiu, Radu
    TEM JOURNAL-TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATICS, 2015, 4 (04): : 388 - 395
  • [50] Rigor in usability testing
    Hughes, M
    TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION, 1999, 46 (04) : 488 - 494