DOSIMETRIC IMPACT OF INTERFRACTION CATHETER MOVEMENT IN HIGH-DOSE RATE PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY

被引:33
|
作者
Foster, William [1 ]
Cunha, J. Adam M. [1 ]
Hsu, I-Chow [1 ]
Weinberg, Vivan [1 ]
Krishnamurthy, Devan [1 ]
Pouliot, Jean [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiat Oncol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
HDR brachytherapy; Prostate; Interfraction catheter displacement; Dosimetry; EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIOTHERAPY; HDR-BRACHYTHERAPY; CANCER; OPTIMIZATION; IMPLANT; BOOST;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.01.016
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the impact of interfraction catheter movement on dosimetry in prostate high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy. Methods and Materials: Fifteen patients were treated with fractionated HDR brachytherapy. Implants were performed on day 1 under transrectal ultrasound guidance. A computed tomography (CT) scan was performed. Inverse planning simulated annealing was used for treatment planning. The first fraction was delivered on day 1. A cone beam CT (CBCT) was performed on day 2 before the second fraction was given. A fusion of the CBCT and CT was performed using intraprostatic gold markers as landmarks. Initial prostate and urethra contours were transferred to the CBCT images. Bladder and rectum contours were drawn, and catheters were digitized on the CBCT. The planned treatment was applied to the CBCT dataset, and dosimetry was analyzed and compared to the initial dose distribution. This process was repeated after a reoptimization was performed, using the same constraints used on day 1. Results: Mean interfraction catheter displacement was 5.1 mm. When we used the initial plan on day 2, the mean prostate V100 (volume receiving 100 Gy or more) decreased from 93.8% to 76.2% (p < 0.01). Rectal V75 went from 0.75 cm(3) to 1.49 cm(3) (p < 0.01). A reoptimization resulted in a mean prostate V100 of 88.1%, closer to the initial plan (p = 0.05). Mean rectal V75 was also improved with a value of 0.59 cm(3). There was no significant change in bladder and urethra dose on day 2. Conclusions: A mean interfraction catheter displacement of 5.1 mm results in a significant decrease in prostate V100 And an increase in rectum dose. A reoptimization before the second treatment improves dose distribution. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 90
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dosimetric Analysis of Catheter Displacement in High Dose Rate Prostate Brachytherapy
    Park, S.
    Kamrava, M.
    Banerjee, R.
    Demanes, D.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [2] Catheter displacements and dosimetric impact in focal salvage high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy
    Moerland, M.
    van Son, M.
    Peters, M.
    Eppinga, W.
    Schokker, R.
    Lagendijk, J.
    van Zyp, J. van der Voort
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 158 : S109 - S110
  • [3] Dosimetric effects of prostate calcifications in high-dose rate brachytherapy calculations
    Musgrave, William
    Chytyk-Praznik, Krista
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (08) : 4400 - 4400
  • [4] Variation in applicator positions during interfraction high-dose rate brachytherapy in carcinoma cervix: dosimetric evaluation
    Passi, Kamlesh
    Aggarwal, Lalit M.
    Vashistha, Rajesh
    Singh, Bikramjit
    Kaur, Parveen
    Gupta, Sureshchandra J.
    Kehwar, Than S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2013, 12 (04) : 305 - 317
  • [5] THE DOSIMETRIC SIGNIFICANCE OF CATHETER DISPLACEMENT IN PROSTATE HIGH DOSE-RATE (HDR) BRACHYTHERAPY
    Soliman, H.
    Sankreacha, R.
    Hunt, D.
    Loblaw, A.
    Morton, G.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 88 : S32 - S32
  • [6] Study of Dosimetric Variation Due to Interfraction Organ Movement in High Dose Rate Interstital (MUPIT) Brachytherapy for Gynecologic Malignancies
    Velmurugan, T.
    Prabakar, S.
    Krishnappan, C.
    Kani, M. Janarthina
    Raghavendiran, B.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)
  • [7] Study of dosimetric variation due to interfraction organ movement in High Dose Rate Interstital (MUPIT) brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies
    Velmurugan, Thanigaimalai
    Sukumar, Prabakar
    Krishnappan, Chokkalingam
    Boopathy, Raghavendiran
    [J]. POLISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS AND ENGINEERING, 2010, 16 (02) : 85 - 95
  • [8] Interfraction patient motion and implant displacement in prostate high dose rate brachytherapy
    Fox, C. D.
    Kron, T.
    Leahy, M.
    Duchesne, G.
    Williams, S.
    Tai, K. H.
    Haworth, A.
    Herschtal, A.
    Foroudi, F.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (11) : 5838 - 5843
  • [9] A SMALL TOLERANCE FOR CATHETER DISPLACEMENT IN HIGH-DOSE RATE PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY IS NECESSARY AND FEASIBLE
    Tiong, Albert
    Bydder, Sean
    Ebert, Martin
    Caswell, Nikki
    Waterhouse, David
    Spry, Nigel
    Camille, Peter
    Joseph, David
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 76 (04): : 1066 - 1072
  • [10] Online correction of catheter movement using CT in high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy
    Huang, Yimei
    Miller, Brett
    Doemer, Anthony
    Babij, Dan
    Kumar, Sanath
    Frontera, Rene
    Nurushev, Teamour
    Chetty, Indrin J.
    Aref, Ibrahim
    [J]. BRACHYTHERAPY, 2013, 12 (03) : 260 - 266