In Vitro Evaluation of Different Dietary Methane Mitigation Strategies

被引:34
|
作者
Chagas, Juana C. [1 ]
Ramin, Mohammad [1 ]
Krizsan, Sophie J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Dept Agr Res Northern Sweden, S-90183 Umea, Sweden
来源
ANIMALS | 2019年 / 9卷 / 12期
关键词
antimethanogenic; chemical inhibition; global warming; halogenated compound; macroalgae; methane production; methanogenic inhibitor; plant inhibitory compound; FATTY-ACID-COMPOSITION; ENTERIC METHANE; GRASS-SILAGE; DAIRY-COWS; ASPARAGOPSIS-TAXIFORMIS; NITROGEN-METABOLISM; MILK-PRODUCTION; RED-CLOVER; EMISSIONS; GAS;
D O I
10.3390/ani9121120
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Dietary methane mitigation strategies do not necessarily make food production from ruminants more energy-efficient, but reducing methane (CH4) in the atmosphere immediately slows down global warming, helping to keep it within 2 degrees C above the pre-industrial baseline. There is no single most efficient strategy for mitigating enteric CH4 production from domestic ruminants on forage-based diets. This study assessed a wide variety of dietary CH4 mitigation strategies in the laboratory, to provide background for future studies with live animals on the efficiency and feasibility of dietary manipulation strategies to reduce CH4 production. Among different chemical and plant-derived inhibitors and potential CH4-reducing diets assessed, inclusion of the natural antimethanogenic macroalga Asparagopsis taxiformis showed the strongest, and dose-dependent, CH4 mitigating effect, with the least impact on rumen fermentation parameters. Thus, applying Asparagopsis taxiformis at a low daily dose was the best potential dietary mitigation strategy tested, with promising long-term effects, and should be further studied in diets for lactating dairy cows. Abstract We assessed and ranked different dietary strategies for mitigating methane (CH4) emissions and other fermentation parameters, using an automated gas system in two in vitro experiments. In experiment 1, a wide range of dietary CH4 mitigation strategies was tested. In experiment 2, the two most promising CH4 inhibitory compounds from experiment 1 were tested in a dose-response study. In experiment 1, the chemical compounds 2-nitroethanol, nitrate, propynoic acid, p-coumaric acid, bromoform, and Asparagopsis taxiformis (AT) decreased predicted in vivo CH4 production (1.30, 21.3, 13.9, 24.2, 2.00, and 0.20 mL/g DM, respectively) compared with the control diet (38.7 mL/g DM). The 2-nitroethanol and AT treatments had lower molar proportions of acetate and higher molar proportions of propionate and butyrate compared with the control diet. In experiment 2, predicted in vivo CH4 production decreased curvilinearly, molar proportions of acetate decreased, and propionate and butyrate proportions increased curvilinearly with increased levels of AT and 2-nitroethanol. Thus 2-nitroethanol and AT were the most efficient strategies to reduce CH4 emissions in vitro, and AT inclusion additionally showed a strong dose-dependent CH4 mitigating effect, with the least impact on rumen fermentation parameters.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] In vitro evaluation of enteric methane mitigation strategies: A meta-analysis.
    Martins, L. F.
    Congio, G. F. S.
    Cueva, S. F.
    Lage, C. F. A.
    Ramin, M.
    Silvestre, T.
    Tricarico, J.
    Hristov, A. N.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2022, 105 : 310 - 310
  • [2] Evaluation methods and enteric methane mitigation strategies in ruminants
    Ribeiro Pereira, Luiz Gustavo
    REVISTA COLOMBIANA DE CIENCIAS PECUARIAS, 2013, 26 : 264 - 277
  • [3] Dietary Ruminant Enteric Methane Mitigation Strategies: Current Findings, Potential Risks and Applicability
    Lileikis, Tomas
    Nainiene, Rasa
    Bliznikas, Saulius
    Uchockis, Virginijus
    ANIMALS, 2023, 13 (16):
  • [4] In vitro evaluation of the methane mitigation potential of a range of grape marc products
    Russo, V. M.
    Jacobs, J. L.
    Hannah, M. C.
    Moate, P. J.
    Dunshea, F. R.
    Leury, B. J.
    ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2017, 57 (07) : 1437 - 1444
  • [5] Evaluation of the performance of existing mathematical models predicting enteric methane emissions from ruminants: Animal categories and dietary mitigation strategies
    Benaouda, Mohammed
    Martin, Cecile
    Li, Xinran
    Kebreab, Ermias
    Hristov, Alexander N.
    Yu, Zhongtang
    Yanez-Ruiz, David R.
    Reynolds, Christopher K.
    Crompton, Les A.
    Dijkstra, Jan
    Bannink, Andre
    Schwarm, Angela
    Kreuzer, Michael
    McGee, Mark
    Lund, Peter
    Hellwing, Anne L. F.
    Weisbjerg, Martin R.
    Moate, Peter J.
    Bayat, Ali R.
    Shingfield, Kevin J.
    Peiren, Nico
    Eugene, Maguy
    ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 255
  • [6] METHANE MITIGATION STRATEGIES FOR DAIRY HERDS
    Chase, L. E.
    2016 CORNELL NUTRITION CONFERENCE FOR FEED MANUFACTURERS, 2016, : 197 - 204
  • [7] Evaluation of dietary strategies to reduce methane production in ruminants: A modelling approach
    Benchaar, C
    Pomar, C
    Chiquette, J
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2001, 81 (04) : 563 - 574
  • [8] Enteric methane mitigation strategies in ruminants: a review
    Ribeiro Pereira, Luiz Gustavo
    Machado, Fernanda S.
    Campos, Mariana M.
    Guimaraes Junior, Roberto
    Tomich, Thierry R.
    Reis, Larissa G.
    Coombs, Cassius
    REVISTA COLOMBIANA DE CIENCIAS PECUARIAS, 2015, 28 (02) : 124 - 143
  • [9] Methanogens: Methane Producers of the Rumen and Mitigation Strategies
    Hook, Sarah E.
    Wright, Andre-Denis G.
    McBride, Brian W.
    ARCHAEA-AN INTERNATIONAL MICROBIOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 2010
  • [10] Screening macroalgae for mitigation of enteric methane in vitro
    D. E. Wasson
    H. Stefenoni
    S. F. Cueva
    C. Lage
    S. E. Räisänen
    A. Melgar
    M. Fetter
    M. Hennessy
    K. Narayan
    N. Indugu
    D. Pitta
    C. Yarish
    A. N. Hristov
    Scientific Reports, 13