Evaluation methods and enteric methane mitigation strategies in ruminants

被引:0
|
作者
Ribeiro Pereira, Luiz Gustavo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Embrapa Gado Leite, Juiz De Fora, MG, Brazil
[2] Embrapa CAPq FAPEMIG, Projeto Rumen Gases, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
[3] CNPq, Prod, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
关键词
climate change; greenhouse gas; livestock; methane; sustainability;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Latin America livestock industries have been especially criticised because of their large greenhouse gas production as a result of the use of degraded forages and performances below production potential. Agriculture contributes a significant amount of the three main greenhouse gases: methane (CH4), carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrous oxide (N2O). Methane gas has a global warming potential 25 times greater than CO2. Enteric methane is an important greenhouse gas which is responsible for approximately 15% of global warming. The tendency and legal necessity to mitigate the greenhouse gas emissions is likely to have a direct influence on the increased efficiency of livestock systems, including animal nutrition and handling. The development of mitigation strategies and the viability of the strategies' practical applications are issues that have been researched around the world. There are various nutritional strategies to mitigate enteric methane that have been studied and developed. All of these have different viabilities, costs and possibilities to be accepted by the producers. The choice of which one will be adopted should be based on the capacity to reduce methane emissions associated with economical viability and the maintenance of animal performance. The increase in zootechnial parameters that will be achieved in production systems (mainly the ones related to efficient forage use) associated with good nutritional, health and reproductive management are important strategies to consolidate Brazil as a food producer to the world, respecting the demands related to the land, water, conservation of biodiversity and the emission of greenhouse gases.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 277
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Enteric methane mitigation strategies in ruminants: a review
    Ribeiro Pereira, Luiz Gustavo
    Machado, Fernanda S.
    Campos, Mariana M.
    Guimaraes Junior, Roberto
    Tomich, Thierry R.
    Reis, Larissa G.
    Coombs, Cassius
    [J]. REVISTA COLOMBIANA DE CIENCIAS PECUARIAS, 2015, 28 (02) : 124 - 143
  • [2] Advanced estimation and mitigation strategies: a cumulative approach to enteric methane abatement from ruminants
    Islam, Mahfuzul
    Lee, Sang-Suk
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 61 (03) : 122 - 137
  • [3] Role of Secondary Plant Metabolites on Enteric Methane Mitigation in Ruminants
    Ku-Vera, Juan Carlos
    Jimenez-Ocampo, Rafael
    Valencia-Salazar, Sara Stephanie
    Montoya-Flores, Maria Denisse
    Molina-Botero, Isabel Cristina
    Arango, Jacobo
    Gomez-Bravo, Carlos Alfredo
    Aguilar-Perez, Carlos Fernando
    Solorio-Sanchez, Francisco Javier
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2020, 7
  • [4] The Role of Chitosan as a Possible Agent for Enteric Methane Mitigation in Ruminants
    Jimenez-Ocampo, Rafael
    Valencia-Salazar, Sara
    Elisa Pinzon-Diaz, Carmen
    Herrera-Torres, Esperanza
    Fernando Aguilar-Perez, Carlos
    Arango, Jacobo
    Carlos Ku-Vera, Juan
    [J]. ANIMALS, 2019, 9 (11):
  • [5] In vitro evaluation of enteric methane mitigation strategies: A meta-analysis.
    Martins, L. F.
    Congio, G. F. S.
    Cueva, S. F.
    Lage, C. F. A.
    Ramin, M.
    Silvestre, T.
    Tricarico, J.
    Hristov, A. N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2022, 105 : 310 - 310
  • [6] Evaluation of the performance of existing mathematical models predicting enteric methane emissions from ruminants: Animal categories and dietary mitigation strategies
    Benaouda, Mohammed
    Martin, Cecile
    Li, Xinran
    Kebreab, Ermias
    Hristov, Alexander N.
    Yu, Zhongtang
    Yanez-Ruiz, David R.
    Reynolds, Christopher K.
    Crompton, Les A.
    Dijkstra, Jan
    Bannink, Andre
    Schwarm, Angela
    Kreuzer, Michael
    McGee, Mark
    Lund, Peter
    Hellwing, Anne L. F.
    Weisbjerg, Martin R.
    Moate, Peter J.
    Bayat, Ali R.
    Shingfield, Kevin J.
    Peiren, Nico
    Eugene, Maguy
    [J]. ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 255
  • [7] Strategies to Mitigate Enteric Methane Emissions in Ruminants: A Review
    Palangi, Valiollah
    Taghizadeh, Akbar
    Abachi, Soheila
    Lackner, Maximilian
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (20)
  • [8] New aspects and strategies for methane mitigation from ruminants
    Sanjay Kumar
    Prasanta Kumar Choudhury
    Maria Dolores Carro
    Gareth Wyn Griffith
    Sumit Singh Dagar
    Monica Puniya
    Serena Calabro
    Sreenivas Rao Ravella
    Tejpal Dhewa
    Ramesh Chandra Upadhyay
    Sunil Kumar Sirohi
    Shivlal Singh Kundu
    Metha Wanapat
    Anil Kumar Puniya
    [J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2014, 98 : 31 - 44
  • [9] Recent Advances in Measurement and Dietary Mitigation of enteric Methane emissions in Ruminants
    Patra, Amlan K.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2016, 3
  • [10] New aspects and strategies for methane mitigation from ruminants
    Kumar, Sanjay
    Choudhury, Prasanta Kumar
    Dolores Carro, Maria
    Griffith, Gareth Wyn
    Dagar, Sumit Singh
    Puniya, Monica
    Calabro, Serena
    Ravella, Sreenivas Rao
    Dhewa, Tejpal
    Upadhyay, Ramesh Chandra
    Sirohi, Sunil Kumar
    Kundu, Shivlal Singh
    Wanapat, Metha
    Puniya, Anil Kumar
    [J]. APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2014, 98 (01) : 31 - 44