In Vitro Evaluation of Different Dietary Methane Mitigation Strategies

被引:34
|
作者
Chagas, Juana C. [1 ]
Ramin, Mohammad [1 ]
Krizsan, Sophie J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Dept Agr Res Northern Sweden, S-90183 Umea, Sweden
来源
ANIMALS | 2019年 / 9卷 / 12期
关键词
antimethanogenic; chemical inhibition; global warming; halogenated compound; macroalgae; methane production; methanogenic inhibitor; plant inhibitory compound; FATTY-ACID-COMPOSITION; ENTERIC METHANE; GRASS-SILAGE; DAIRY-COWS; ASPARAGOPSIS-TAXIFORMIS; NITROGEN-METABOLISM; MILK-PRODUCTION; RED-CLOVER; EMISSIONS; GAS;
D O I
10.3390/ani9121120
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Dietary methane mitigation strategies do not necessarily make food production from ruminants more energy-efficient, but reducing methane (CH4) in the atmosphere immediately slows down global warming, helping to keep it within 2 degrees C above the pre-industrial baseline. There is no single most efficient strategy for mitigating enteric CH4 production from domestic ruminants on forage-based diets. This study assessed a wide variety of dietary CH4 mitigation strategies in the laboratory, to provide background for future studies with live animals on the efficiency and feasibility of dietary manipulation strategies to reduce CH4 production. Among different chemical and plant-derived inhibitors and potential CH4-reducing diets assessed, inclusion of the natural antimethanogenic macroalga Asparagopsis taxiformis showed the strongest, and dose-dependent, CH4 mitigating effect, with the least impact on rumen fermentation parameters. Thus, applying Asparagopsis taxiformis at a low daily dose was the best potential dietary mitigation strategy tested, with promising long-term effects, and should be further studied in diets for lactating dairy cows. Abstract We assessed and ranked different dietary strategies for mitigating methane (CH4) emissions and other fermentation parameters, using an automated gas system in two in vitro experiments. In experiment 1, a wide range of dietary CH4 mitigation strategies was tested. In experiment 2, the two most promising CH4 inhibitory compounds from experiment 1 were tested in a dose-response study. In experiment 1, the chemical compounds 2-nitroethanol, nitrate, propynoic acid, p-coumaric acid, bromoform, and Asparagopsis taxiformis (AT) decreased predicted in vivo CH4 production (1.30, 21.3, 13.9, 24.2, 2.00, and 0.20 mL/g DM, respectively) compared with the control diet (38.7 mL/g DM). The 2-nitroethanol and AT treatments had lower molar proportions of acetate and higher molar proportions of propionate and butyrate compared with the control diet. In experiment 2, predicted in vivo CH4 production decreased curvilinearly, molar proportions of acetate decreased, and propionate and butyrate proportions increased curvilinearly with increased levels of AT and 2-nitroethanol. Thus 2-nitroethanol and AT were the most efficient strategies to reduce CH4 emissions in vitro, and AT inclusion additionally showed a strong dose-dependent CH4 mitigating effect, with the least impact on rumen fermentation parameters.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Meta-Analysis of Methane Mitigation Strategies: Improved Predictions of Mitigation Potentials and Production Implications
    Ogbonna, A. Chijioke
    Saetnan, E. Rudinow
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2018, 8 (04): : 567 - 573
  • [42] Methane mitigation timelines to inform energy technology evaluation
    Roy, Mandira
    Edwards, Morgan R.
    Trancik, Jessika E.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2015, 10 (11):
  • [43] Evaluation of Methane and Carbon Dioxide Production from Cattle on Different Diet Adaptation Strategies
    Mansfield, Cindy
    Sjostrand, Rebecca L.
    Troyer, Braden C.
    Heil, Holly A.
    Norman, Mitchell M.
    Youngers, Maggie
    Watson, Andrea K.
    Erickson, Galen E.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2023, 101
  • [44] Evaluation of Methane and Carbon Dioxide Production from Cattle on Different Diet Adaptation Strategies
    Mansfield, Cindy
    Sjostrand, Rebecca L.
    Troyer, Braden C.
    Heil, Holly A.
    Norman, Mitchell M.
    Youngers, Maggie
    Watson, Andrea K.
    Erickson, Galen E.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2023, 101 : 220 - 221
  • [45] Dietary cadmium exposure, risks to human health and mitigation strategies
    Zhao, Di
    Wang, Peng
    Zhao, Fang-Jie
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 53 (08) : 939 - 963
  • [46] Mitigation of ruminant methane production: current strategies, constraints and future options
    Muhammad Farooq Iqbal
    Yan-Fen Cheng
    Wei-Yun Zhu
    Basit Zeshan
    World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2008, 24 : 2747 - 2755
  • [47] The role of methane in global warming: where might mitigation strategies be focused?
    Milich, L
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 1999, 9 (03): : 179 - 201
  • [48] The role of methane in future climate strategies: mitigation potentials and climate impacts
    Harmsen, Mathijs
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    Bodirsky, Benjamin Leon
    Chateau, Jean
    Durand-Lasserve, Olivier
    Drouet, Laurent
    Fricko, Oliver
    Fujimori, Shinichiro
    Gernaat, David E. H. J.
    Hanaoka, Tatsuya
    Hilaire, Jerome
    Keramidas, Kimon
    Luderer, Gunnar
    Moura, Maria Cecilia P.
    Sano, Fuminori
    Smith, Steven J.
    Wada, Kenichi
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2020, 163 (03) : 1409 - 1425
  • [49] Methane emissions as energy reservoir: Context, scope, causes and mitigation strategies
    Chai Xiaoli
    Tonjes, David J.
    Mahajan, Devinder
    PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 2016, 56 : 33 - 70
  • [50] Agricultural Methane Emissions in China: Inventories, Driving Forces and Mitigation Strategies
    Duan, Yang
    Gao, Yueming
    Zhao, Jing
    Xue, Yinglan
    Zhang, Wei
    Wu, Wenjun
    Jiang, Hongqiang
    Cao, Dong
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 57 (36) : 13292 - 13303