In Vitro Evaluation of Different Dietary Methane Mitigation Strategies

被引:34
|
作者
Chagas, Juana C. [1 ]
Ramin, Mohammad [1 ]
Krizsan, Sophie J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Dept Agr Res Northern Sweden, S-90183 Umea, Sweden
来源
ANIMALS | 2019年 / 9卷 / 12期
关键词
antimethanogenic; chemical inhibition; global warming; halogenated compound; macroalgae; methane production; methanogenic inhibitor; plant inhibitory compound; FATTY-ACID-COMPOSITION; ENTERIC METHANE; GRASS-SILAGE; DAIRY-COWS; ASPARAGOPSIS-TAXIFORMIS; NITROGEN-METABOLISM; MILK-PRODUCTION; RED-CLOVER; EMISSIONS; GAS;
D O I
10.3390/ani9121120
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Dietary methane mitigation strategies do not necessarily make food production from ruminants more energy-efficient, but reducing methane (CH4) in the atmosphere immediately slows down global warming, helping to keep it within 2 degrees C above the pre-industrial baseline. There is no single most efficient strategy for mitigating enteric CH4 production from domestic ruminants on forage-based diets. This study assessed a wide variety of dietary CH4 mitigation strategies in the laboratory, to provide background for future studies with live animals on the efficiency and feasibility of dietary manipulation strategies to reduce CH4 production. Among different chemical and plant-derived inhibitors and potential CH4-reducing diets assessed, inclusion of the natural antimethanogenic macroalga Asparagopsis taxiformis showed the strongest, and dose-dependent, CH4 mitigating effect, with the least impact on rumen fermentation parameters. Thus, applying Asparagopsis taxiformis at a low daily dose was the best potential dietary mitigation strategy tested, with promising long-term effects, and should be further studied in diets for lactating dairy cows. Abstract We assessed and ranked different dietary strategies for mitigating methane (CH4) emissions and other fermentation parameters, using an automated gas system in two in vitro experiments. In experiment 1, a wide range of dietary CH4 mitigation strategies was tested. In experiment 2, the two most promising CH4 inhibitory compounds from experiment 1 were tested in a dose-response study. In experiment 1, the chemical compounds 2-nitroethanol, nitrate, propynoic acid, p-coumaric acid, bromoform, and Asparagopsis taxiformis (AT) decreased predicted in vivo CH4 production (1.30, 21.3, 13.9, 24.2, 2.00, and 0.20 mL/g DM, respectively) compared with the control diet (38.7 mL/g DM). The 2-nitroethanol and AT treatments had lower molar proportions of acetate and higher molar proportions of propionate and butyrate compared with the control diet. In experiment 2, predicted in vivo CH4 production decreased curvilinearly, molar proportions of acetate decreased, and propionate and butyrate proportions increased curvilinearly with increased levels of AT and 2-nitroethanol. Thus 2-nitroethanol and AT were the most efficient strategies to reduce CH4 emissions in vitro, and AT inclusion additionally showed a strong dose-dependent CH4 mitigating effect, with the least impact on rumen fermentation parameters.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Equine Contribution in Methane Emission and Its Mitigation Strategies
    Elghandour, Mona M. M. Y.
    Adegbeye, Moyosore Joseph
    Barbabosa-Pilego, Alberto
    Rivero Perez, Nallely
    Rojas Hernandez, Saul
    Zaragoza-Bastida, Adrian
    Salem, Abdelfattah Z. M.
    JOURNAL OF EQUINE VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2019, 72 : 56 - 63
  • [22] New aspects and strategies for methane mitigation from ruminants
    Kumar, Sanjay
    Choudhury, Prasanta Kumar
    Dolores Carro, Maria
    Griffith, Gareth Wyn
    Dagar, Sumit Singh
    Puniya, Monica
    Calabro, Serena
    Ravella, Sreenivas Rao
    Dhewa, Tejpal
    Upadhyay, Ramesh Chandra
    Sirohi, Sunil Kumar
    Kundu, Shivlal Singh
    Wanapat, Metha
    Puniya, Anil Kumar
    APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2014, 98 (01) : 31 - 44
  • [23] In Vitro Fermentation Characteristics and Methane Mitigation Responded to Flavonoid Extract Levels from Alternanthera sissoo and Dietary Ratios
    Sommai, Sukruthai
    Cherdthong, Anusorn
    Suntara, Chanon
    So, Sarong
    Wanapat, Metha
    Polyorach, Sineenart
    FERMENTATION-BASEL, 2021, 7 (03):
  • [24] Evaluation of Current Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies
    Gilsenan, Alicia
    Andrews, Elizabeth B.
    Calingaert, Brian
    Crozier, Debra
    Vanderpuije, Abenah
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2009, 18 : S177 - S178
  • [25] Persistency of methane mitigation by dietary nitrate supplementation in dairy cows
    van Zijderveld, S. M.
    Gerrits, W. J. J.
    Dijkstra, J.
    Newbold, J. R.
    Hulshof, R. B. A.
    Perdok, H. B.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2011, 94 (08) : 4028 - 4038
  • [26] Assessment of Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies in Oncology: Summary of the Oncology Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies Workshop
    Frame, James N.
    Jacobson, Joseph O.
    Vogel, Wendy H.
    Griffith, Niesha
    Wariabharaj, Darshan
    Garg, Rekha
    Zon, Robin
    Stephens, Cyntha L.
    Bialecki, Alison M.
    Bruinooge, Suanna S.
    Allen, Steven L.
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2013, 9 (02) : E24 - E39
  • [27] Evaluation of Different Brown Seaweeds as Feed and Feed Additives Regarding Rumen Fermentation and Methane Mitigation
    Ahmed, Eslam
    Batbekh, Belgutei
    Fukuma, Naoki
    Hanada, Masaaki
    Nishida, Takehiro
    FERMENTATION-BASEL, 2022, 8 (10):
  • [28] An introduction to risk evaluation and mitigation strategies
    Dohm, Julie
    Ji, Mingham
    CONTRACEPTION, 2021, 104 (01) : 4 - 7
  • [29] Dietary mitigation of enteric methane emissions from ruminants:A review of plant tannin mitigation options
    Byeng RMin
    Sandra Solaiman
    Heidi MWaldrip
    David Parker
    Richard WTodd
    David Brauer
    Animal Nutrition, 2020, 6 (03) : 231 - 246
  • [30] Dietary mitigation of enteric methane emissions from ruminants:A review of plant tannin mitigation options
    Byeng R.Min
    Sandra Solaiman
    Heidi M.Waldrip
    David Parker
    Richard W.Todd
    David Brauer
    Animal Nutrition , 2020, (03) : 231 - 246