Formal methods for prostate cancer Gleason score and treatment prediction using radiomic biomarkers

被引:34
|
作者
Brunese, Luca [1 ]
Mercaldo, Francesco [2 ,4 ]
Reginelli, Alfonso [3 ]
Santone, Antonella [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Molise, Dept Med & Hlth Sci Vincenzo Tiberio, Campobasso, Italy
[2] Natl Res Council Italy CNR, Inst Informat & Telemat, Pisa, Italy
[3] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Dept Precis Med, Naples, Italy
[4] Univ Molise, Dept Biosci & Terr, Pesche, IS, Italy
关键词
Formal methods; Model checking; Radiomics;
D O I
10.1016/j.mri.2019.08.030
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Prostate cancer is a significant public health burden and a major cause of morbidity and mortality among men worldwide. Only in 2018 were reported 1.3 million of new diagnosed patients. Usually an invasive trans-perineal biopsy is the way to diagnose prostate cancer grade by prostate tissue removal. In this paper we propose a non invasive method to detect the prostate cancer grade (the so-called Gleason score) by computing radiomic biomarkers from magnetic resonance images. Furthermore, the proposed method predicts whether the cancer is suitable for the surgery treatment basing on the pathologist and surgeon suggestions. We represent patient magnetic resonances in terms of formal models and, through an algorithm designed by authors, we infer a set of properties aimed to predict the Gleason score and the treatment. By exploiting a formal verification environment, the properties are verified on two different real-world data-sets, the first one is composed of 36 patients, while the second one of 26, confirming the effectiveness of the proposed method.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 175
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Gleason Score Evolution and the Effect on Prostate Cancer Outcomes
    Swanson, Gregory P.
    Trevathan, Sean
    Hammonds, Kendall A. P.
    Speights, V. O.
    Hermans, Michael R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2021, 155 (05) : 711 - 717
  • [32] BRE score in breast cancer, Gleason score in prostate cancer and tumor budding score in colorectal cancer?
    Karamitopoulou, E.
    Kondi-Pafiti, A.
    Koelzer, V.
    Karandrea, D.
    Gennatas, K.
    Patsouris, E.
    Zlobec, I.
    Lugli, A.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2011, 459 : S155 - S155
  • [33] GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING AND PROSTATE CANCER: USING MOLECULAR BASIS OF EARLY PROSTATE CANCER TO IMPROVE ON GLEASON SCORE
    Iddawela, Mahesh
    Boyd, Sarah
    Frydenberg, Mark
    Risbridger, Gail
    Nim, Hiue
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 12 : 50 - 50
  • [34] Joint Prostate Cancer Detection and Gleason Score Prediction in mp-MRI via FocalNet
    Cao, Ruiming
    Bajgiran, Amirhossein Mohammadian
    Mirak, Sohrab Afshari
    Shakeri, Sepideh
    Zhong, Xinran
    Enzmann, Dieter
    Raman, Steven
    Sung, Kyunghyun
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2019, 38 (11) : 2496 - 2506
  • [35] Prediction of extraprostatic cancer by prostate specific antigen density, endorectal MRI, and biopsy gleason score in clinically localized prostate cancer
    Horiguchi, A
    Nakashima, J
    Horiguchi, Y
    Nakagawa, K
    Oya, M
    Ohigashi, T
    Marumo, K
    Murai, M
    PROSTATE, 2003, 56 (01): : 23 - 29
  • [36] THE QUANTITATIVE GLEASON SCORE IMPROVES THE PREDICTION OF BIOCHEMICAL PROSTATE CANCER RECURRENCE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN MEN WITH GLEASON 7 DISEASE
    Reese, Adam
    Cowan, Janet
    Brajtbord, Jonathan
    Harris, Catherine
    Carroll, Peter
    Cooperberg, Matthew
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : E81 - E82
  • [37] One core gleason score 6 prostate cancer: Clinically insignificant prostate cancer?
    Schafer, Georg
    Horninger, Wolfgang
    Pelzer, Alexandre E.
    Brunner, Andrea
    Mikuz, Gregor
    Bektic, Jasmin
    Bartsch, Georg
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 718 - 719
  • [38] The factors impacting on Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer with initial low Gleason scores
    Huang, Tzu-Heng
    Li, Wei-Ming
    Ke, Hung-Lung
    Li, Ching-Chia
    Wu, Wen-Jeng
    Yeh, Hsin-Chih
    Wang, Yen-Chun
    Lee, Hsiang-Ying
    JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2025, 124 (02) : 145 - 150
  • [39] Molecular Characterization of Prostate Cancer with Associated Gleason Score Using Mass Spectrometry Imaging
    Randall, Elizabeth C.
    Zadra, Giorgia
    Chetta, Paolo
    Lopez, Begona G. C.
    Syamala, Sudeepa
    Basu, Sankha S.
    Agar, Jeffrey N.
    Loda, Massimo
    Tempany, Clare M.
    Fennessy, Fiona M.
    Agar, Nathalie Y. R.
    MOLECULAR CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 17 (05) : 1155 - 1165
  • [40] Gleason score 5+3=8 prostate cancer: much more like Gleason score 9?
    Mahal, Brandon A.
    Muralidhar, Vinayak
    Chen, Yu-Wei
    Choueiri, Toni K.
    Hoffman, Karen E.
    Hu, Jim C.
    Sweeney, Christopher J.
    Yu, James B.
    Feng, Felix Y.
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 118 (01) : 95 - 101