The factors impacting on Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer with initial low Gleason scores

被引:1
|
作者
Huang, Tzu-Heng [1 ,2 ]
Li, Wei-Ming [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Ke, Hung-Lung [3 ,4 ,7 ,8 ]
Li, Ching-Chia [3 ,4 ]
Wu, Wen-Jeng [3 ,4 ,6 ,8 ,9 ]
Yeh, Hsin-Chih [3 ,4 ,7 ,8 ]
Wang, Yen-Chun [3 ]
Lee, Hsiang-Ying [3 ,4 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Kaohsiung Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Urol, Kaohsiung 833401, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Kaohsiung 833401, Taiwan
[3] Kaohsiung Med Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan
[4] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Coll Med, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
[5] Minist Hlth & Welf Pingtung Hosp, Dept Urol, Pingtung 90054, Taiwan
[6] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Cohort Res Ctr, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
[7] Kaohsiung Municipal Tatung Hosp, Dept Urol, Kaohsiung 80145, Taiwan
[8] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Grad Inst Med, Coll Med, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
[9] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Grad Inst Clin Med, Coll Med, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
关键词
Prostate biopsy; Prostate cancer; Prostate volume; ANTIGEN DENSITY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; PSA DENSITY; VOLUME; MEN; RISK; PREDICTION; SIZE; FEATURES; GRADE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfma.2024.03.014
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: This study aims to investigate the factors contributing to the discrepancy in between biopsy Gleason score (GS) and radical prostatectomy GS in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer. Methods: 341 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy from 2011/04 to 2020/12 were identified. 102 Patients with initial GS of six after biopsy were enrolled. Preoperative clinical variables and pathological variables were also obtained and assessed. The optimal cut-off points for significant continuous variables were identified by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: Upgrading was observed in 63 patients and non-upgrading in 39 patients. In the multiple variables assessed, smaller prostate volume (PV) (p value = 0.0007), prostate specific antigen density (PSAD) (p value = 0.0055), positive surgical margins (p value = 0.0062) and pathological perineural invasion (p value = 0.0038) were significant predictors of GS upgrading. To further explore preclinical variables, a cut-off value for PV (<= 38 ml, p value = 0.0017) and PSAD (>= 0.26 ng/ml2, p value = 0.0013) were identified to be associated with GS upgrading. Conclusion: Smaller PV and elevated PSAD are associated with increased risk of GS upgrading, whereas lead-time bias is not. A cut-off value of PV < 38 ml and PSAD > 0.26 ng/ml2 were further identified to be associated with pathological GS upgrading.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 150
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predictive factors in the upgrading of Gleason score in prostate cancer patients
    Koh, Nan Jun
    Chia, Sing Joo
    Tan, Jing Yuan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 23 : 69 - 69
  • [2] Prostate Size as a Predictor of Gleason Score Upgrading in Patients With Low Risk Prostate Cancer
    Davies, Judson D.
    Aghazadeh, Monty A.
    Phillips, Sharon
    Salem, Shady
    Chang, Sam S.
    Clark, Peter E.
    Cookson, Michael S.
    Davis, Rodney
    Herrell, S. Duke
    Penson, David F.
    Smith, Joseph A., Jr.
    Barocas, Daniel A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (06): : 2221 - 2227
  • [3] GLEASON SCORE UPGRADING IN NCCN VERY LOW RISK CLASSIFICATION PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS
    Nazmy, Michael
    Lau, Clayton
    Wilson, Timothy
    Yamzon, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : E284 - E284
  • [4] Predictive Factors of Gleason Score Upgrading in Localized and Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Diagnosed by Prostate Biopsy
    Moon, Seung Jin
    Park, Sung Yul
    Lee, Tchun Yong
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 51 (10) : 677 - 682
  • [5] THE EFFECT OF AGE AND PROSTATE SIZE ON GLEASON SCORE UPGRADING
    Gershman, Boris
    Wu, Chin-Lee
    McDougal, W. Scott
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (04): : E80 - E80
  • [6] Upgrading of Gleason score and prostate volume: a clinicopathological analysis
    Kim, Kwang Hyun
    Lim, Sey Kiat
    Shin, Tae-Young
    Lee, Joo Yong
    Chung, Byung Ha
    Rha, Koon Ho
    Hong, Sung Joon
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 (08) : 1310 - 1316
  • [7] Role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to predict postoperative Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer with Gleason score 3 + 4
    Hwanik Kim
    Jung Kwon Kim
    Sung Kyu Hong
    Chang Wook Jeong
    Ja Hyeon Ku
    Cheol Kwak
    World Journal of Urology, 2021, 39 : 1825 - 1830
  • [8] Upgrading Gleason score 7 and tertiary grade 5 prostate cancer is warranted
    Nature Clinical Practice Oncology, 2008, 5 (2): : 69 - 69
  • [9] Role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to predict postoperative Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer with Gleason score 3+4
    Kim, Hwanik
    Kim, Jung Kwon
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    Jeong, Chang Wook
    Ku, Ja Hyeon
    Kwak, Cheol
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (06) : 1825 - 1830
  • [10] Global Gleason Score on Prostate Needle Biopsies as Predictor of Prostatectomy Gleason Score: Comparison with Highest Gleason Score, Greatest-Percent and Largest-Length Gleason Scores
    Shevchuk, M. M.
    Strivastava, A.
    Tewari, A.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2011, 91 : 224A - 224A