Formal methods for prostate cancer Gleason score and treatment prediction using radiomic biomarkers

被引:34
|
作者
Brunese, Luca [1 ]
Mercaldo, Francesco [2 ,4 ]
Reginelli, Alfonso [3 ]
Santone, Antonella [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Molise, Dept Med & Hlth Sci Vincenzo Tiberio, Campobasso, Italy
[2] Natl Res Council Italy CNR, Inst Informat & Telemat, Pisa, Italy
[3] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Dept Precis Med, Naples, Italy
[4] Univ Molise, Dept Biosci & Terr, Pesche, IS, Italy
关键词
Formal methods; Model checking; Radiomics;
D O I
10.1016/j.mri.2019.08.030
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Prostate cancer is a significant public health burden and a major cause of morbidity and mortality among men worldwide. Only in 2018 were reported 1.3 million of new diagnosed patients. Usually an invasive trans-perineal biopsy is the way to diagnose prostate cancer grade by prostate tissue removal. In this paper we propose a non invasive method to detect the prostate cancer grade (the so-called Gleason score) by computing radiomic biomarkers from magnetic resonance images. Furthermore, the proposed method predicts whether the cancer is suitable for the surgery treatment basing on the pathologist and surgeon suggestions. We represent patient magnetic resonances in terms of formal models and, through an algorithm designed by authors, we infer a set of properties aimed to predict the Gleason score and the treatment. By exploiting a formal verification environment, the properties are verified on two different real-world data-sets, the first one is composed of 36 patients, while the second one of 26, confirming the effectiveness of the proposed method.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 175
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Association between the dihydrotestosterone level in the prostate and prostate cancer aggressiveness using the Gleason score
    Nishiyama, T
    Ikarashi, T
    Hashimoto, Y
    Suzuki, K
    Takahashi, K
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (04): : 136 - 136
  • [22] Fitting Methods for Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging of Prostate Cancer on Region of Interest Level: Repeatability and Gleason Score Prediction
    Merisaari, Harri
    Movahedi, Parisa
    Perez, Ileana M.
    Toivonen, Jussi
    Pesola, Marko
    Taimen, Pekka
    Bostrom, Peter J.
    Pahikkala, Tapio
    Kiviniemi, Aida
    Aronen, Hannu J.
    Jambor, Ivan
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2017, 77 (03) : 1249 - 1264
  • [23] Prostate Gleason Score Detection by Calibrated Machine Learning Classification through Radiomic Features
    Mercaldo, Francesco
    Brunese, Maria Chiara
    Merolla, Francesco
    Rocca, Aldo
    Zappia, Marcello
    Santone, Antonella
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (23):
  • [24] Lineage Relationships of Gleason Patterns in Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer
    Cheville, J. C.
    Kovtun, I. V.
    Murphy, S. J.
    Johnson, S. H.
    Zarei, S.
    Kosari, F.
    Sukov, W.
    Castellar, E. J. Parilla
    Karnes, R. J.
    Vasmatzis, G.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2013, 26 : 202A - 202A
  • [25] Lineage Relationship of Gleason Patterns in Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer
    Kovtun, Irina V.
    Cheville, John C.
    Murphy, Stephen J.
    Johnson, Sarah H.
    Zarei, Shabnam
    Kosari, Farhad
    Sukov, William R.
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Vasmatzis, George
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 73 (11) : 3275 - 3284
  • [26] Lineage Relationships of Gleason Patterns in Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer
    Cheville, J. C.
    Kovtun, I. V.
    Murphy, S. J.
    Johnson, S. H.
    Zarei, S.
    Kosari, F.
    Sukov, W.
    Castellar, E. J. Parilla
    Karnes, R. J.
    Vasmatzis, G.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2013, 93 : 202A - 202A
  • [27] Comparison of quantitative parameters and radiomic features as inputs into machine learning models to predict the Gleason score of prostate cancer lesions
    Nai, Ying-Hwey
    Cheong, Dennis Lai Hong
    Roy, Sharmili
    Kok, Trina
    Stephenson, Mary C.
    Schaefferkoetter, Josh
    Totman, John J.
    Conti, Maurizio
    Eriksson, Lars
    Robins, Edward G.
    Wang, Ziting
    Chua, Wynne Yuru
    Ang, Bertrand Wei Leng
    Singha, Arvind Kumar
    Thamboo, Thomas Paulraj
    Chiong, Edmund
    Reilhac, Anthonin
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2023, 100 : 64 - 72
  • [28] Prediction of Prostate Gleason Score Using Neural Network and Multi-Parametric MRI
    Chen, S.
    D'Souza, W.
    Gullapalli, R.
    Mistry, N.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [29] Using the Gleason score as a prostate cancer prognostic factor: Leave seven alone
    Qian, J
    Burke, HB
    Hoang, A
    Ma, J
    Bostwick, DG
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2002, 82 (01) : 177A - 177A
  • [30] Using the Gleason score as a prostate cancer prognostic factor: Leave seven alone
    Qian, J
    Burke, HB
    Hoang, A
    Ma, J
    Bostwick, DG
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2002, 15 (01) : 177A - 177A