A scoping review of risk-stratified bowel screening: current evidence, future directions

被引:13
|
作者
Cairns, J. M. [1 ]
Greenley, S. [1 ]
Bamidele, O. [1 ]
Weller, D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hull, Hull York Med Sch, Cottingham Rd, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 7HR, N Humberside, England
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Ctr Populat Hlth Sci, Teviot Pl, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Bowel; Colorectal; Screening; Risk-stratified; Feasibility; Acceptability; FECAL IMMUNOCHEMICAL TEST; ADVANCED COLORECTAL NEOPLASIA; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; FAMILY-HISTORY; DECISION-MAKING; CANCER; POPULATION; TOOL; COLONOSCOPY; SCORE;
D O I
10.1007/s10552-022-01568-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose In this scoping review, we examined the international literature on risk-stratified bowel screening to develop recommendations for future research, practice and policy. Methods Six electronic databases were searched from inception to 18 October 2021: Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Forward and backwards citation searches were also undertaken. All relevant literature were included. Results After de-deduplication, 3,629 records remained. 3,416 were excluded at the title/abstract screening stage. A further 111 were excluded at full-text screening stage. In total, 102 unique studies were included. Results showed that risk-stratified bowel screening programmes can potentially improve diagnostic performance, but there is a lack of information on longer-term outcomes. Risk models do appear to show promise in refining existing risk stratification guidelines but most were not externally validated and less than half achieved good discriminatory power. Risk assessment tools in primary care have the potential for high levels of acceptability and uptake, and therefore, could form an important component of future risk-stratified bowel screening programmes, but sometimes the screening recommendations were not adhered to by the patient or healthcare provider. The review identified important knowledge gaps, most notably in the area of organisation of screening services due to few pilots, and what risk stratification might mean for inequalities. Conclusion We recommend that future research focuses on what organisational challenges risk-stratified bowel screening may face and a consideration of inequalities in any changes to organised bowel screening programmes.
引用
收藏
页码:653 / 685
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening for optimal use of colonoscopy resources
    Yang, Dong-Hoon
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 36 (04): : 839 - 841
  • [42] Polygenic risk-stratified screening for cancer: Responsibilization in public health genomics
    Kerr, Anne
    Broer, Tineke
    Ross, Emily
    Burley, Sarah Cunningham
    SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, 2019, 49 (04) : 605 - 626
  • [43] Nationwide registry-based trial of risk-stratified cervical screening
    Muhr, Laila Sara Arroyo
    Wang, Jiangrong
    Hassan, Sadaf S.
    Yilmaz, Emel
    Elfstrom, Miriam K.
    Dillner, Joakim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2025, 156 (02) : 379 - 388
  • [44] Risk-stratified screening for ischemic heart disease in kidney transplant candidates
    Kasiske, BL
    Malik, MA
    Herzog, CA
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 80 (06) : 815 - 820
  • [45] The cost-effectiveness of risk-stratified breast cancer screening in the UK
    Hill, Harry
    Kearns, Ben
    Pashayan, Nora
    Roadevin, Cristina
    Sasieni, Peter
    Offman, Judith
    Duffy, Stephen
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2023, 129 (11) : 1801 - 1809
  • [46] RISK-STRATIFIED BREAST CANCER SCREENING AND NON-ADHERENCE IN GERMANY
    Arnold, M.
    Quante, A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (09) : A442 - A442
  • [47] Implementing Risk-Stratified Breast Screening in England: An Agenda Setting Meeting
    McWilliams, Lorna
    Evans, D. Gareth
    Payne, Katherine
    Harrison, Fiona
    Howell, Anthony
    Howell, Sacha J.
    French, David P.
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (19)
  • [48] Cost-Effectiveness of AI for Risk-Stratified Breast Cancer Screening
    Hill, Harry
    Roadevin, Cristina
    Duffy, Stephen
    Mandrik, Olena
    Brentnall, Adam
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (09)
  • [49] THE VALUE OF RISK-STRATIFIED INFORMATION IN THE NATIONAL LUNG CANCER SCREENING TRIAL
    Soeteman, D., I
    Cohen, J. T.
    Neumann, P. J.
    Wong, J. B.
    Kent, D. M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (07) : A324 - A325
  • [50] Evidence-based orthobiologic practice: Current evidence review and future directions
    Jeyaraman, Madhan
    Jeyaraman, Naveen
    Ramasubramanian, Swaminathan
    Balaji, Sangeetha
    Muthu, Sathish
    WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS, 2024, 15 (10):