A scoping review of risk-stratified bowel screening: current evidence, future directions

被引:13
|
作者
Cairns, J. M. [1 ]
Greenley, S. [1 ]
Bamidele, O. [1 ]
Weller, D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hull, Hull York Med Sch, Cottingham Rd, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 7HR, N Humberside, England
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Ctr Populat Hlth Sci, Teviot Pl, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Bowel; Colorectal; Screening; Risk-stratified; Feasibility; Acceptability; FECAL IMMUNOCHEMICAL TEST; ADVANCED COLORECTAL NEOPLASIA; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; FAMILY-HISTORY; DECISION-MAKING; CANCER; POPULATION; TOOL; COLONOSCOPY; SCORE;
D O I
10.1007/s10552-022-01568-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose In this scoping review, we examined the international literature on risk-stratified bowel screening to develop recommendations for future research, practice and policy. Methods Six electronic databases were searched from inception to 18 October 2021: Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Forward and backwards citation searches were also undertaken. All relevant literature were included. Results After de-deduplication, 3,629 records remained. 3,416 were excluded at the title/abstract screening stage. A further 111 were excluded at full-text screening stage. In total, 102 unique studies were included. Results showed that risk-stratified bowel screening programmes can potentially improve diagnostic performance, but there is a lack of information on longer-term outcomes. Risk models do appear to show promise in refining existing risk stratification guidelines but most were not externally validated and less than half achieved good discriminatory power. Risk assessment tools in primary care have the potential for high levels of acceptability and uptake, and therefore, could form an important component of future risk-stratified bowel screening programmes, but sometimes the screening recommendations were not adhered to by the patient or healthcare provider. The review identified important knowledge gaps, most notably in the area of organisation of screening services due to few pilots, and what risk stratification might mean for inequalities. Conclusion We recommend that future research focuses on what organisational challenges risk-stratified bowel screening may face and a consideration of inequalities in any changes to organised bowel screening programmes.
引用
收藏
页码:653 / 685
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Implications of polygenic risk-stratified screening for prostate cancer on overdiagnosis
    Pashayan, Nora
    Duffy, Stephen W.
    Neal, David E.
    Hamdy, Freddie
    Donovan, Jenny
    Martin, Richard M.
    Harrington, Patricia
    Benlloch, Sara
    Al Olama, Ali A.
    Shah, Mitul
    Kote-Jarai, Zsofia
    Easton, Douglas F.
    Eeles, Rosalind
    Pharoah, Paul D.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 74 (19)
  • [32] Implementation Challenges for Risk-Stratified Screening in the Era of Precision Medicine
    Roberts, Megan C.
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2018, 4 (11) : 1484 - 1485
  • [33] Toward Risk-Stratified Breast Cancer Screening: Considerations for Changes in Screening Guidelines
    Gierach, Gretchen L.
    Choudhury, Parichoy Pal
    Garcia-Closas, Montserrat
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2020, 6 (01) : 31 - 33
  • [34] Implications of polygenic risk-stratified screening for prostate cancer on overdiagnosis
    Pashayan, Nora
    Duffy, Stephen W.
    Neal, David E.
    Hamdy, Freddie C.
    Donovan, Jenny L.
    Martin, Richard M.
    Harrington, Patricia
    Benlloch, Sara
    Al Olama, Ali Amin
    Shah, Mitul
    Kote-Jarai, Zsofia
    Easton, Douglas F.
    Eeles, Rosalind
    Pharoah, Paul D.
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 17 (10) : 789 - 795
  • [35] Implementing risk-stratified screening for common cancers: a review of potential ethical, legal and social issues
    Hall, A. E.
    Chowdhury, S.
    Hallowell, N.
    Pashayan, N.
    Dent, T.
    Pharoah, P.
    Burton, H.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 36 (02) : 285 - 291
  • [36] A discrete choice experiment to understand public preferences and priorities for risk-stratified bowel cancer screening programmes in the UK
    Dennison, Rebecca A.
    Thomas, Chloe V.
    Morris, Stephen
    Usher-Smith, Juliet A.
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2023, 177
  • [37] The current situation and future directions for the study on time-to-pregnancy: a scoping review
    Xiang Hong
    Jiechen Yin
    Wei Wang
    Fanqi Zhao
    Hong Yu
    Bei Wang
    Reproductive Health, 19
  • [38] Radiomics in Kidney Transplantation: A Scoping Review of Current Applications, Limitations, and Future Directions
    Lim, Ee Jean
    Yen, Jie
    Fong, Khi Yung
    Tiong, Ho Yee
    Aslim, Edwin Jonathan
    Lay Guat Ng
    Castellani, Daniele
    Borgheresi, Alessandra
    Agostini, Andrea
    Somani, Bhaskar Kumar
    Gauhar, Vineet
    Gan, Valerie Huei Li
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 108 (03) : 643 - 653
  • [39] The current situation and future directions for the study on time-to-pregnancy: a scoping review
    Hong, Xiang
    Yin, Jiechen
    Wang, Wei
    Zhao, Fanqi
    Yu, Hong
    Wang, Bei
    REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2022, 19 (01)
  • [40] The cost-effectiveness of risk-stratified breast cancer screening in the UK
    Harry Hill
    Ben Kearns
    Nora Pashayan
    Cristina Roadevin
    Peter Sasieni
    Judith Offman
    Stephen Duffy
    British Journal of Cancer, 2023, 129 : 1801 - 1809