A scoping review of risk-stratified bowel screening: current evidence, future directions

被引:13
|
作者
Cairns, J. M. [1 ]
Greenley, S. [1 ]
Bamidele, O. [1 ]
Weller, D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hull, Hull York Med Sch, Cottingham Rd, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 7HR, N Humberside, England
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Ctr Populat Hlth Sci, Teviot Pl, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Bowel; Colorectal; Screening; Risk-stratified; Feasibility; Acceptability; FECAL IMMUNOCHEMICAL TEST; ADVANCED COLORECTAL NEOPLASIA; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; FAMILY-HISTORY; DECISION-MAKING; CANCER; POPULATION; TOOL; COLONOSCOPY; SCORE;
D O I
10.1007/s10552-022-01568-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose In this scoping review, we examined the international literature on risk-stratified bowel screening to develop recommendations for future research, practice and policy. Methods Six electronic databases were searched from inception to 18 October 2021: Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Forward and backwards citation searches were also undertaken. All relevant literature were included. Results After de-deduplication, 3,629 records remained. 3,416 were excluded at the title/abstract screening stage. A further 111 were excluded at full-text screening stage. In total, 102 unique studies were included. Results showed that risk-stratified bowel screening programmes can potentially improve diagnostic performance, but there is a lack of information on longer-term outcomes. Risk models do appear to show promise in refining existing risk stratification guidelines but most were not externally validated and less than half achieved good discriminatory power. Risk assessment tools in primary care have the potential for high levels of acceptability and uptake, and therefore, could form an important component of future risk-stratified bowel screening programmes, but sometimes the screening recommendations were not adhered to by the patient or healthcare provider. The review identified important knowledge gaps, most notably in the area of organisation of screening services due to few pilots, and what risk stratification might mean for inequalities. Conclusion We recommend that future research focuses on what organisational challenges risk-stratified bowel screening may face and a consideration of inequalities in any changes to organised bowel screening programmes.
引用
收藏
页码:653 / 685
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Psychosis in adolescents in Africa: A scoping review for current understanding and future directions
    Adjorlolo, Samuel
    Setordzi, Mawuko
    COGENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 8 (01):
  • [22] Frailty and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Scoping Review of Current Evidence
    Fons, Anne
    Kalisvaart, Kees
    Maljaars, Jeroen
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (02)
  • [23] Power and negotiation: review of current evidence and future directions
    Schaerer, Michael
    Teo, Laurel
    Madan, Nikhil
    Swaab, Roderick I.
    CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 33 : 47 - 51
  • [24] A Risk-Stratified Approach to Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening
    Keto, Christopher J.
    Freedland, Stephen J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 59 (04) : 506 - 508
  • [25] Post-deployment Mental Health Screening: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence and Future Directions
    Panaite, Vanessa
    Brown, Racine
    Henry, Michelle
    Garcia, Amanda
    Powell-Cope, Gail
    Vanderploeg, Rodney D.
    Belanger, Heather G.
    ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 45 (06) : 850 - 875
  • [26] Post-deployment Mental Health Screening: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence and Future Directions
    Vanessa Panaite
    Racine Brown
    Michelle Henry
    Amanda Garcia
    Gail Powell-Cope
    Rodney D. Vanderploeg
    Heather G. Belanger
    Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 2018, 45 : 850 - 875
  • [27] Heterogeneity in how women value risk-stratified breast screening
    Wheeler, Jack C. W.
    Keogh, Louise
    Sierra, Maria A.
    Devereux, Lisa
    Jones, Katherine
    IJzerman, Maarten J.
    Trainer, Alison H.
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 24 (01) : 146 - 156
  • [28] Risk of Inflammatory Bowel Disease with Oral Contraceptives and Menopausal Hormone Therapy: Current Evidence and Future Directions
    Khalili, Hamed
    DRUG SAFETY, 2016, 39 (03) : 193 - 197
  • [29] Risk of Inflammatory Bowel Disease with Oral Contraceptives and Menopausal Hormone Therapy: Current Evidence and Future Directions
    Hamed Khalili
    Drug Safety, 2016, 39 : 193 - 197
  • [30] Is risk-stratified breast cancer screening economically efficient in Germany?
    Arnold, Matthias
    Pfeifer, Katharina
    Quante, Anne S.
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (05):