New method to measure coronary velocity and coronary flow reserve

被引:6
|
作者
Zhang, Z. -D. [1 ]
Svendsen, M. [1 ]
Choy, J. S. [1 ]
Sinha, A. K. [2 ]
Huo, Y. [1 ]
Yoshida, K. [1 ]
Molloi, S. [3 ]
Kassab, G. S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Purdue Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Purdue Univ, Dept Med, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Radiol Sci, Irvine, CA 92717 USA
关键词
catheter; conductance; DIGITAL-SUBTRACTION-ANGIOGRAPHY; BLOOD-FLOW; IMPEDANCE CATHETER; DOPPLER VELOCITY; LUMEN AREA; THERMODILUTION; VALIDATION; QUANTIFICATION; INJECTIONS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1152/ajpheart.00080.2011
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Zhang ZD, Svendsen M, Choy JS, Sinha AK, Huo Y, Yoshida K, Molloi S, Kassab GS. New method to measure coronary velocity and coronary flow reserve. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 301: H21-H28, 2011. First published May 6, 2011; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00080.2011.-Coronary flow reserve (CFR) is an important index of coronary microcirculatory function. The objective of this study was to validate the reproducibility and accuracy of intravascular conductance catheter-based method for measurements of baseline and hyperemic coronary flow velocity (and hence CFR). The absolute coronary blood velocity was determined by measuring the time of transit of a saline injection between two pairs of electrodes (known distance) on a conductance catheter during a routine saline injection without the need for reference flow. In vitro validation was made in the velocity range of 5 to 70 cm/s in reference to the volume collection method. In 10 swine, velocity measurements were compared with those from a flow probe in coronary arteries at different CFR attained by microsphere embolization. In vitro, the mean difference between the proposed method and volume collection was 0.7 +/- 1.34 cm/s for steady flow and -0.77 +/- 2.22 cm/s for pulsatile flow. The mean difference between duplicate measurements was 0 +/- 1.4 cm/s. In in vivo experiments, the flow (product of velocity and lumen cross-sectional area that is also measured by the conductance catheter) was determined in both normal and stenotic vessels and the mean difference between the proposed method and flow probe was -1 +/- 12 ml/min (flow ranged from 10 to 130 ml/min). For CFR, the mean difference between the two methods was 0.06 +/- 0.28 (range of 1 to 3). Our results demonstrate the reproducibility and accuracy of velocity and CFR measurements with a conductance catheter by use of a standard saline injection. The ability of the combined measurement of coronary lumen area (as previously validated) and current velocity and CFR measurements provides an integrative diagnostic tool for interventional cardiology.
引用
收藏
页码:H21 / H28
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Coronary microvascular dysfunction in autoimmune rheumatic diseases: beyond coronary flow velocity reserve
    Cecere, Annagrazia
    Marra, Martina Perazzolo
    Zanatta, Elisabetta
    Civieri, Giovanni
    Iliceto, Sabino
    Tona, Francesco
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [42] Association of coronary atherosclerosis with coronary flow velocity reserve evaluated by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography
    Yamashita, K
    Tasaki, H
    Suzuka, H
    Nihei, S
    Hirakawa, N
    Nakashima, Y
    ATHEROSCLEROSIS SUPPLEMENTS, 2003, 4 (02) : 156 - 157
  • [43] Reduction of Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve as the Main Driver of Prognostically Beneficial Coronary Revascularization
    Cortigiani, Lauro
    Gaibazzi, Nicola
    Ciampi, Quirino
    Rigo, Fausto
    Tuttolomondo, Domenico
    Bovenzi, Francesco
    Gregori, Dario
    Carerj, Scipione
    Pepi, Mauro
    Pellikka, Patricia A.
    Picano, Eugenio
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2025, 38 (01) : 24 - 32
  • [44] INSTANTANEOUS PRESSURE-VELOCITY RELATIONSHIP IN CORONARY FLOW, AN ALTERNATIVE TO MEASURING CORONARY RESERVE - A STUDY OF THE FEASIBILITY AND REPRODUCIBILITY OF THE METHOD
    MENEVEAU, N
    DIMARIO, C
    GIL, R
    DEJAEGERE, P
    DEFEYTER, PJ
    ROELANDT, J
    SERRUYS, PW
    ARCHIVES DES MALADIES DU COEUR ET DES VAISSEAUX, 1993, 86 (07): : 975 - 985
  • [45] Effects of smoking on coronary blood flow velocity and coronary flow reserve assessed by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography
    Park, Seong-Mi
    Shim, Wan-Joo
    Song, Woo-Hyuk
    Lim, Do-Sun
    Kim, Young-Hoon
    Ro, Young-Moo
    ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY-A JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ULTRASOUND AND ALLIED TECHNIQUES, 2006, 23 (06): : 465 - 470
  • [46] Abnormal coronary flow velocity reserve after coronary artery stenting in patients - Role of relative coronary reserve to assess potential mechanisms
    Kern, MJ
    Puri, S
    Bach, RG
    Donohue, TJ
    Dupouy, P
    Caracciolo, EA
    Craig, WR
    Aguirre, F
    Aptecar, E
    Wolford, TL
    Mechem, CJ
    Dubois-Rande, JL
    CIRCULATION, 1999, 100 (25) : 2491 - 2498
  • [47] Noninvasive assessment of coronary flow velocity and coronary flow velocity reserve in the left anterior descending coronary artery by Doppler echocardiography - Comparison with invasive technique
    Hozumi, T
    Yoshida, K
    Akasaka, T
    Asami, Y
    Ogata, Y
    Takagi, T
    Kaji, S
    Kawamoto, T
    Ueda, Y
    Morioka, S
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 32 (05) : 1251 - 1259
  • [48] Noninvasive assessment of coronary flow velocity and coronary flow velocity reserve in the right coronary artery by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography: Comparison with intracoronary Doppler guidewire
    Ueno, Y
    Nakamura, Y
    Takashima, H
    Kinoshita, M
    Soma, A
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2002, 15 (10) : 1074 - 1079
  • [49] Coronary flow velocity reserve is impaired in hypertensive patients with hyperhomocysteinemia
    J Liu
    Y Xu
    H Zhang
    X Gao
    H Fan
    G Wang
    Journal of Human Hypertension, 2014, 28 : 743 - 747
  • [50] Mechanisms of coronary flow velocity reserve impairment in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
    Kim, H. -K.
    Lee, S. -P.
    Cho, G. -Y.
    Kim, Y. -J.
    Sohn, D. -W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 183 : 694 - 695