New method to measure coronary velocity and coronary flow reserve

被引:6
|
作者
Zhang, Z. -D. [1 ]
Svendsen, M. [1 ]
Choy, J. S. [1 ]
Sinha, A. K. [2 ]
Huo, Y. [1 ]
Yoshida, K. [1 ]
Molloi, S. [3 ]
Kassab, G. S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Purdue Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Purdue Univ, Dept Med, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Radiol Sci, Irvine, CA 92717 USA
关键词
catheter; conductance; DIGITAL-SUBTRACTION-ANGIOGRAPHY; BLOOD-FLOW; IMPEDANCE CATHETER; DOPPLER VELOCITY; LUMEN AREA; THERMODILUTION; VALIDATION; QUANTIFICATION; INJECTIONS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1152/ajpheart.00080.2011
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Zhang ZD, Svendsen M, Choy JS, Sinha AK, Huo Y, Yoshida K, Molloi S, Kassab GS. New method to measure coronary velocity and coronary flow reserve. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 301: H21-H28, 2011. First published May 6, 2011; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00080.2011.-Coronary flow reserve (CFR) is an important index of coronary microcirculatory function. The objective of this study was to validate the reproducibility and accuracy of intravascular conductance catheter-based method for measurements of baseline and hyperemic coronary flow velocity (and hence CFR). The absolute coronary blood velocity was determined by measuring the time of transit of a saline injection between two pairs of electrodes (known distance) on a conductance catheter during a routine saline injection without the need for reference flow. In vitro validation was made in the velocity range of 5 to 70 cm/s in reference to the volume collection method. In 10 swine, velocity measurements were compared with those from a flow probe in coronary arteries at different CFR attained by microsphere embolization. In vitro, the mean difference between the proposed method and volume collection was 0.7 +/- 1.34 cm/s for steady flow and -0.77 +/- 2.22 cm/s for pulsatile flow. The mean difference between duplicate measurements was 0 +/- 1.4 cm/s. In in vivo experiments, the flow (product of velocity and lumen cross-sectional area that is also measured by the conductance catheter) was determined in both normal and stenotic vessels and the mean difference between the proposed method and flow probe was -1 +/- 12 ml/min (flow ranged from 10 to 130 ml/min). For CFR, the mean difference between the two methods was 0.06 +/- 0.28 (range of 1 to 3). Our results demonstrate the reproducibility and accuracy of velocity and CFR measurements with a conductance catheter by use of a standard saline injection. The ability of the combined measurement of coronary lumen area (as previously validated) and current velocity and CFR measurements provides an integrative diagnostic tool for interventional cardiology.
引用
收藏
页码:H21 / H28
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A novel method to simultaneously measure fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve
    Gruberg, L
    Mintz, GS
    Weissman, NJ
    Shalman, E
    Barak, C
    Dgani, E
    Pichard, AD
    Berogan, B
    Leon, MB
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 35 (02) : 92A - 92A
  • [2] Corrected coronary flow velocity reserve: A new concept for assessing coronary perfusion
    Wieneke, H
    Haude, M
    Ge, J
    Altmann, C
    Kaiser, S
    Baumgart, D
    von Birgelen, C
    Welge, D
    Erbel, R
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 35 (07) : 1713 - 1720
  • [3] Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve and Survival
    De Bruyne, Bernard
    Penicka, Martin
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2012, 5 (11) : 1086 - 1087
  • [4] Coronary flow velocity and coronary flow velocity reserve in children with ventricular septal defect
    Harada, K
    Aoki, M
    Toyono, M
    Tamura, M
    TOHOKU JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2004, 202 (02): : 77 - 85
  • [5] Estimation of coronary flow reserve with the instantaneous coronary flow velocity versus pressure relation: A new index of coronary flow reserve independent of perfusion pressure
    Kondo, M
    Azuma, A
    Yamada, H
    Kohno, H
    Kawata, K
    Tatsukawa, H
    Ohnishi, K
    Kohno, Y
    Asayama, J
    Nakagawa, M
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1996, 132 (06) : 1127 - 1134
  • [6] Assessment of coronary flow reserve by coronary pressure measurement - Comparison with flow- or velocity-derived coronary flow reserve
    Akasaka, T
    Yamamuro, A
    Kamiyama, N
    Koyama, Y
    Akiyama, M
    Watanabe, N
    Neishi, Y
    Takagi, T
    Shalman, E
    Barak, C
    Yoshida, K
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (09) : 1554 - 1560
  • [7] Echocardiographic assessment of coronary flow velocity and coronary flow velocity reserve in ischemic cardiac disease
    Takeuchi M.
    Otsuji Y.
    Lang R.M.
    Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports, 2008, 1 (1) : 49 - 57
  • [8] Flow velocity and predictors of a suboptimal coronary flow velocity reserve after coronary balloon angioplasty
    Albertal, M
    Regar, E
    Van Langenhove, G
    Carlier, SG
    Serrano, R
    Boersma, E
    Bruyne, B
    Di Mario, C
    Piek, J
    Serruys, RW
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2002, 23 (02) : 133 - 138
  • [9] A new angiographic method to assess coronary flow reserve
    Rittger, H.
    Kuper, A.
    Breithardt, O.
    Sinha, A.
    Schmidt, M.
    Jakob, A.
    Bluem, B.
    Brachmann, J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2009, 30 : 250 - 250
  • [10] Acute effect of cigarette smoking on coronary flow velocity and coronary flow reserve
    Tanaka, T
    Oka, Y
    Tawara, I
    Sada, T
    Kira, Y
    CIRCULATION, 1996, 94 (08) : 790 - 790