T-wave area as biomarker of clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

被引:11
|
作者
Vegh, Eszter M. [1 ,2 ]
Engels, Elien B. [3 ]
van Deursen, Caroline J. M. [3 ,4 ]
Merkely, Bela [2 ]
Vernooy, Kevin [4 ]
Singh, Jagmeet P. [1 ]
Prinzen, Frits W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Cardiac Arrhythmia Serv, Boston, MA USA
[2] Semmelweis Univ, Heart & Vasc Ctr, Budapest, Hungary
[3] Maastricht Univ, Dept Physiol, Cardiovasc Res Inst Maastricht, POB 616, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Maastricht Univ, Dept Cardiol, Cardiovasc Res Inst Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands
来源
EUROPACE | 2016年 / 18卷 / 07期
关键词
Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Long-term clinical outcome; Vectorcardiography; Left bundle branch block; T wave area; BUNDLE-BRANCH BLOCK; HEART-FAILURE; VECTORCARDIOGRAM; WOMEN; SIZE; MEN;
D O I
10.1093/europace/euv259
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims There is increasing evidence that left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology on the electrocardiogram is a positive predictor for response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We previously demonstrated that the vectorcardiography (VCG)-derived T-wave area predicts echocardiographic CRT response in LBBB patients. In the present study, we investigate whether the T-wave area also predicts long-term clinical outcome to CRT. Methods and results This is a retrospective study consisting of 335 CRT recipients. Primary endpoint were the composite of heart failure (HF) hospitalization, heart transplantation, left ventricular assist device implantation or death during a 3-year follow-up period. HF hospitalization and death alone were secondary endpoints. The patient subgroup with a large T-wave area and LBBB 36% reached the primary endpoint, which was considerably less (P < 0.01) than for patients with LBBB and a small T-wave area or non-LBBB patients with a small or large T-wave area (48, 57, and 51%, respectively). Similar differences were observed for the secondary endpoints, HF hospitalization (31 vs. 51, 51, and 38%, respectively, P < 0.01) and death (19 vs. 42, 34, and 42%, respectively, P < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, a large T-wave area and LBBB were the only independent predictors of the combined endpoint besides high creatinine levels and use of diuretics. Conclusion T-wave area may be useful as an additional biomarker to stratify CRT candidates and improve selection of those most likely to benefit from CRT. A large T-wave area may derive its predictive value from reflecting good intrinsic myocardial properties and a substrate for CRT.
引用
收藏
页码:1077 / 1085
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The cardiac resynchronization therapy can decrease microvolt T wave alternans
    Chen, Zhen
    Hou, Xiaofeng
    Tang, Yuanyuan
    Zhang, Feng
    Zou, Jiangang
    [J]. CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 129 : 74 - 74
  • [32] Cardiac resynchronization therapy response in cardiac sarcoidosis
    Shabtaie, Samuel A.
    Sehrawat, Ojasav
    Lee, Justin Z.
    Cha, Yong-Mei
    Mulpuru, Siva K.
    Kowlgi, Narayan G.
    Siontis, Konstantinos C.
    Rosenbaum, Andrew N.
    Bois, John P.
    AbouEzzeddine, Omar F.
    Noseworthy, Peter A.
    Asirvatham, Samuel J.
    DeSimone, Christopher, V
    Deshmukh, Abhishek J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (09) : 2072 - 2080
  • [33] Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response in Cardiac Sarcoidosis
    Shabtaie, Samuel A.
    Lee, Justin Z.
    Desimone, Christopher V.
    Cha, Yong-mei
    Kapa, Suraj
    Bois, John
    Rosenbaum, Andrew
    Abouezzeddine, Omar F.
    Siontis, Konstantinos
    Mulpuru, Siva K.
    Deshmukh, Abhishek
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2021, 144
  • [34] The electrophysiological diagnostic of the T-wave response
    Schott, K
    Moths, C
    Schafer, G
    Bartels, M
    Schabet, M
    [J]. EEG-EMG-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ELEKTROENZEPHALOGRAPHIE ELEKTROMYOGRAPHIE UND VERWANDTE GEBIETE, 1995, 26 (04): : 244 - 247
  • [35] A biomarker of myocardial fibrosis predicts long-term response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Garcia-Bolao, Ignacio
    Macias, Alfonso
    Lopez, Begona
    Gonzalez, Arantxa
    Gavira, Juan J.
    Azcarate, Pedro
    Alegría, Eduardo
    Díez, Javier
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 47 (11) : 2335 - 2337
  • [36] Assessment of cardiac resynchronization therapy response
    Cattadori, Gaia
    Giraldi, Francesco
    Berti, Marco
    Carbucicchio, Corrado
    Pepi, Mauro
    Della Bella, Paolo
    Contini, Mauro
    Apostolo, Anna
    Berna, Giovanni
    Andreini, Daniele
    Sciomer, Susanna
    Agostoni, Piergiuseppe
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 136 (02) : 240 - 242
  • [37] A Dose Response for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy?
    Faddis, Mitchell N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 53 (04) : 361 - 362
  • [38] Fully automated QRS area measurement for predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Plesinger, Filip
    van Stipdonk, Antonius M. W.
    Smisek, Radovan
    Halamek, Josef
    Jurak, Pavel
    Maass, Alexander H.
    Meine, Mathias
    Vernooy, Kevin
    Prinzen, Frits W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2020, 63 : 159 - 163
  • [39] Response predictors in cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Cuenca Parra, S.
    Monivas Palomero, V.
    Mingo Santos, S.
    Garcia Lunar, I.
    Dominguez Rodriguez, F.
    Mitroi, C.
    Castro Urda, V.
    Rivero Arribas, B.
    Toquero Ramos, J.
    Fernandez Lozano, I.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 34 : 197 - 197
  • [40] Predictors of short-term clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Linde, Cecilia
    Abraham, William T.
    Gold, Michael R.
    Daubert, J. Claude
    Tang, Anthony S. L.
    Young, James B.
    Sherfesee, Lou
    Hudnall, J. Harrison
    Fagan, Dedra H.
    Cleland, John G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2017, 19 (08) : 1056 - 1063