T-wave area as biomarker of clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

被引:11
|
作者
Vegh, Eszter M. [1 ,2 ]
Engels, Elien B. [3 ]
van Deursen, Caroline J. M. [3 ,4 ]
Merkely, Bela [2 ]
Vernooy, Kevin [4 ]
Singh, Jagmeet P. [1 ]
Prinzen, Frits W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Cardiac Arrhythmia Serv, Boston, MA USA
[2] Semmelweis Univ, Heart & Vasc Ctr, Budapest, Hungary
[3] Maastricht Univ, Dept Physiol, Cardiovasc Res Inst Maastricht, POB 616, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Maastricht Univ, Dept Cardiol, Cardiovasc Res Inst Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands
来源
EUROPACE | 2016年 / 18卷 / 07期
关键词
Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Long-term clinical outcome; Vectorcardiography; Left bundle branch block; T wave area; BUNDLE-BRANCH BLOCK; HEART-FAILURE; VECTORCARDIOGRAM; WOMEN; SIZE; MEN;
D O I
10.1093/europace/euv259
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims There is increasing evidence that left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology on the electrocardiogram is a positive predictor for response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We previously demonstrated that the vectorcardiography (VCG)-derived T-wave area predicts echocardiographic CRT response in LBBB patients. In the present study, we investigate whether the T-wave area also predicts long-term clinical outcome to CRT. Methods and results This is a retrospective study consisting of 335 CRT recipients. Primary endpoint were the composite of heart failure (HF) hospitalization, heart transplantation, left ventricular assist device implantation or death during a 3-year follow-up period. HF hospitalization and death alone were secondary endpoints. The patient subgroup with a large T-wave area and LBBB 36% reached the primary endpoint, which was considerably less (P < 0.01) than for patients with LBBB and a small T-wave area or non-LBBB patients with a small or large T-wave area (48, 57, and 51%, respectively). Similar differences were observed for the secondary endpoints, HF hospitalization (31 vs. 51, 51, and 38%, respectively, P < 0.01) and death (19 vs. 42, 34, and 42%, respectively, P < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, a large T-wave area and LBBB were the only independent predictors of the combined endpoint besides high creatinine levels and use of diuretics. Conclusion T-wave area may be useful as an additional biomarker to stratify CRT candidates and improve selection of those most likely to benefit from CRT. A large T-wave area may derive its predictive value from reflecting good intrinsic myocardial properties and a substrate for CRT.
引用
收藏
页码:1077 / 1085
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cardiac resynchronization therapy - Response
    Sutton, MGSJ
    Plappert, T
    Abraham, WT
    Smith, AL
    DeLurgio, DB
    Leon, AR
    Loh, E
    Kocovic, DZ
    Fisher, WG
    Ellestad, M
    Messanger, J
    Kruger, K
    Hilpisch, KE
    Hill, MRS
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2003, 108 (13) : E97 - E97
  • [22] A new biomarker of cardiac resynchronization therapy response: cGMP to mature BNP ratio
    Yokoyama, Yasuhiro
    Kataoka, Naoya
    Nakai, Michikazu
    Matsuo, Ayaka
    Fujiwara, Akihiro
    Wakamiya, Akinori
    Ueda, Nobuhiko
    Nakajima, Kenzaburo
    Kamakura, Tsukasa
    Wada, Mitsuru
    Yamagata, Kenichiro
    Ishibashi, Kohei
    Inoue, Yuko
    Miyamoto, Koji
    Nagase, Satoshi
    Noda, Takashi
    Aiba, Takeshi
    Takahama, Hiroyuki
    Izumi, Chisato
    Kinugawa, Koichiro
    Minamino, Naoto
    Kusano, Kengo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 79 (06) : 727 - 733
  • [23] Electrophysiological parameters predictive of clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Casale, M. Matteo
    Mezzetti, M.
    De Fazio, M. Gigliotti
    Morelli, M.
    Caccamo, L.
    Busacca, P.
    Dattilo, G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2018, 20 : 217 - 218
  • [24] The Postimplantation Electrocardiogram Predicts Clinical Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Coverstone, Edward
    Sheehy, Justin
    Kleiger, Robert E.
    Smith, Timothy W.
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 38 (05): : 572 - 580
  • [25] A novel electrocardiographic predictor of clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Mollo, Roberto
    Cosenza, Alessandro
    Coviello, Ilaria
    Stazi, Alessandra
    Russo, Giulio
    Villano, Angelo
    Sestito, Alfonso
    Bencardino, Gianluigi
    Lanza, Gaetano A.
    Crea, Filippo
    [J]. EUROPACE, 2013, 15 (11): : 1615 - 1621
  • [26] Clinical, echocardiographic and neurohormonal response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: are they interchangeable?
    Hoogslag, G. E.
    Hoke, U.
    Verwey, H. F.
    Thijssen, J.
    Auger, D.
    Marsan, N. Ajmone
    Van der Wall, E. E.
    Schalij, M. J.
    Bax, J. J.
    Delgado, V.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2011, 32 : 914 - 915
  • [27] Vectorcardiographic QRS area as a novel predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
    van Deursen, Caroline J. M.
    Vernooy, Kevin
    Dudink, Elton
    Bergfeldt, Lennart
    Crijns, Harry J. G. M.
    Prinzen, Frits W.
    Wecke, Liliane
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2015, 48 (01) : 45 - 52
  • [28] Prediction of clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy using magnetocardiography
    Usami, S.
    Takaki, H.
    Hashimoto, S.
    Oishi, S.
    Yamada, Y.
    Okamura, H.
    Noda, T.
    Shimizu, W.
    Sugimachi, M.
    Kamakura, S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2011, 32 : 943 - 943
  • [29] CARDIAC PAIN WITH RECOVERY OF THE T-WAVE
    EAST, T
    ORAM, S
    [J]. BRITISH HEART JOURNAL, 1948, 10 (04): : 263 - 281
  • [30] Clinical, Echocardiographic, and Neurohormonal Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Are They Interchangeable?
    Hoogslag, Georgette E.
    Hoke, Ulas
    Thijssen, Joep
    Auger, Dominique
    Marsan, Nina Ajmone
    Wolterbeek, Ron
    Holman, Eduard R.
    Schalij, Martin J.
    Bax, Jeroen J.
    Verwey, Harriette F.
    Delgado, Victoria
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 36 (11): : 1391 - 1401