Double-blind randomized trial of mifepristone in combination with vaginal gemeprost or misoprostol for induction of abortion up to 63 days gestation

被引:45
|
作者
Bartley, J [1 ]
Brown, A [1 ]
Elton, R [1 ]
Baird, DT [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Ctr Reprod Biol, Edinburgh EH3 9ET, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
gemeprost; medical abortion; mifepristone; misoprostol;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/16.10.2098
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Gemeprost and misoprostol are two of the most widely used prostaglandins in combination with mifepristone for medical abortion in early pregnancy. However, the efficacy and side-effects of those two drugs given vaginally have not been assessed in a randomized trial. METHODS: Randomized double-blind controlled trial involving 999 women undergoing an abortion at gestational age less than or equal to 63 days who received either 0.5 mg gemeprost (group 1, n = 499) or 800 mug misoprostol (group II, n = 500) vaginally similar to 48 h after taking 200 mg mifepristone by mouth. The rate of complete abortion and the side-effects were compared between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 89 cases was excluded from full analysis of outcome because either they aborted after mifepristone alone (n = 2), had an ectopic pregnancy (n = 1), or because the outcome was uncertain as they failed to attend their follow-up appointment (n = 86). The rate of complete abortion was very high (> 95%) in both groups but significantly higher after treatment with misoprostol than with gemeprost [436/453 (98.7%) versus 451/457 (96.2%), P = 0.019, difference 2.5%, confidence interval 0.4-4.7%] and there were fewer ongoing pregnancies (n = I versus n = 8, P < 0.018). Surgical intervention rose significantly with gestation in women who received gemeprost (P < 0.03) but not with misoprostol. The incidence of side-effects such as diarrhoea (13.7 versus 16.4%) and vomiting (27.8 versus 29.7%) was similar in women who received misoprostol or gemeprost respectively, as was the duration and amount of bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: (i) Both regimens using a reduced dose of mifepristone are highly effective. methods of inducing abortion in early pregnancy; (ii) vaginal misoprostol is the preferred prostaglandin because it is it is associated with fewer failures than low-dose gemeprost, particularly at gestation greater than or equal to 49 days.
引用
收藏
页码:2098 / 2102
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ruptured membranes at term: Randomized, double-blind trial of oral misoprostol for labor induction
    Lo, JY
    Alexander, JM
    McIntire, DD
    Leveno, KJ
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 101 (04): : 685 - 689
  • [42] Two prophylactic medication approaches in addition to a pain control regimen for early medical abortion &lt; 63 days' gestation with mifepristone and misoprostol: study protocol for a randomized, controlled trial
    Dragoman, Monica V.
    Grossman, Daniel
    Kapp, Nathalie
    Nguyen My Huong
    Habib, Ndema
    Duong Lan Dung
    Tamang, Anand
    REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2016, 13 : 1 - 10
  • [43] A double-blind randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming before outpatient hysteroscopy
    El-Mazny, Akmal
    Abou-Salem, Nermeen
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 96 (04) : 962 - 965
  • [44] Two-pill regimens of misoprostol after mifepristone medical abortion through 63 days' gestational age: a randomized controlled trial of sublingual and oral misoprostol
    Raghavan, Sheila
    Comendant, Rodica
    Digol, Irena
    Ungureanu, Sergiu
    Friptu, Valentin
    Bracken, Hillary
    Winikoff, Beverly
    CONTRACEPTION, 2009, 79 (02) : 84 - 90
  • [45] A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial comparing stepwise oral misoprostol with vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour
    Yenuberi, Hilda
    Abraham, Anuja
    Sebastian, Ajit
    Benjamin, Santosh J.
    Jeyaseelan, Visalakshi
    Mathews, Jiji E.
    TROPICAL DOCTOR, 2016, 46 (04) : 198 - 205
  • [46] Randomized trial of buccal versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of second trimester abortion
    Ellis, Sacheen Carr
    Kapp, Nathalie
    Vragpvoc, Olivera
    Borgata, Lynn
    CONTRACEPTION, 2010, 81 (05) : 441 - 445
  • [47] Comparison of Mifepristone Followed by Misoprostol with Misoprostol Alone for Treatment of Early Pregnancy Failure: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Sinha P.
    Suneja A.
    Guleria K.
    Aggarwal R.
    Vaid N.B.
    The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2018, 68 (1) : 39 - 44
  • [48] INDUCTION OF ABORTION IN THE 2ND TRIMESTER BY A COMBINATION OF MISOPROSTOL AND MIFEPRISTONE - A RANDOMIZED COMPARISON BETWEEN 2 MISOPROSTOL REGIMENS
    ELREFAEY, H
    TEMPLETON, A
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1995, 10 (02) : 475 - 478
  • [49] THE EXTENDED GESTATIONAL AGE MEDICAL ABORTION STUDY: THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MEDICAL ABORTION WITH MIFEPRISTONE AND MISOPROSTOL AT 57-63 DAYS VERSUS 64-70 DAYS GESTATION
    Swica, Y.
    Bracken, H.
    Shannon, C.
    Chong, E.
    Dzube, I
    Tsereteli, T.
    Maistruk, G.
    Winikoff, B.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2010, 82 (02) : 209 - 209
  • [50] A comparison of vaginal vs. oral misoprostol for induction of labor-double blind randomized trial
    Jindal P.
    Avasthi K.
    Kaur M.
    The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2011, 61 (5) : 538 - 542