Ruptured membranes at term: Randomized, double-blind trial of oral misoprostol for labor induction

被引:23
|
作者
Lo, JY [1 ]
Alexander, JM [1 ]
McIntire, DD [1 ]
Leveno, KJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Dallas, TX 75235 USA
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2003年 / 101卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0029-7844(02)03157-5
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To determine if oral misoprostol. can replace oxytocin for labor stimulation in women with ruptured membranes at term and without evidence of labor. METHODS: Nulliparous women at 36 to 41 6/7 weeks with a singleton, cephalic-presenting fetus and ruptured membranes without evidence of labor were randomized to receive oral misoprostol (100 mug) or a placebo every 4 hours for a maximum of two doses. Intravenous oxytocin was initiated if active labor had not ensued within 8 hours of the initial study drug dose. RESULTS: Fifty-one women were randomized to oral misoprostol and 51 women to the placebo. Misoprostol reduced the use of oxytocin stimulation of labor from 90% to 37% (P <.001) and was associated with approximately a 7-hour shorter elapsed time in the labor unit. Uterine hyperactivity, defined as six or more contractions in 10 minutes without fetal heart rate decelerations, occurred in 25% of women randomized to misoprostol. However, uterine hyperactivity associated with fetal heart rate decelerations occurred in only three (6%) women, none of whom required emergency cesarean delivery. Route of delivery and infant outcomes were not related to misoprostol use. CONCLUSION: Oral misoprostol (100 μg) given in a maximum of two doses 4 hours apart significantly reduced the use of oxytocin in the management of women with ruptured membranes without labor at term.
引用
收藏
页码:685 / 689
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Oral or vaginal misoprostol administration for induction of labor: A randomized, double-blind trial
    Adair, CD
    Weeks, JW
    Barrilleaux, S
    Edwards, M
    Burlison, K
    Lewis, DF
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 92 (05): : 810 - 813
  • [2] Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: A double-blind randomized controlled trial
    Fisher, SA
    Mackenzie, VP
    Davies, GAL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (04) : 906 - 910
  • [3] Oral misoprostol for the induction of labor at term: A randomized double blind placebo controlled trial.
    Dodd, JM
    Crowther, CA
    Robinson, JS
    JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR GYNECOLOGIC INVESTIGATION, 2006, 13 (02) : 175A - 175A
  • [4] Induction of labor with oral misoprostol for premature rupture of membranes at term in women with unfavorable cervix: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Levy, Roni
    Vaisbuch, Edi
    Furman, Boris
    Brown, Dov
    Volach, Vania
    Hagay, Zion J.
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2007, 35 (02) : 126 - 129
  • [5] Oral misoprostol for induction of labor in prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) at term: a randomized control trial
    Cheung, Peter C.
    Yeo, Evelyn L. K.
    Wong, Kin Sun
    Tang, Lawrence C. H.
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2006, 85 (09) : 1128 - 1133
  • [6] A comparison of vaginal vs. oral misoprostol for induction of labor-double blind randomized trial
    Jindal P.
    Avasthi K.
    Kaur M.
    The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2011, 61 (5) : 538 - 542
  • [7] A double-blind randomized controlled trial of oral misoprostol and intramuscular syntometrine in the management of the third stage of labor
    Ng, P. S.
    Lai, C. Y.
    Sahota, D. S.
    Yuen, P. M.
    GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2007, 63 (01) : 55 - 60
  • [8] A double-blind randomized controlled trial of oral misoprostol and intramuscular syntometrine in the management of the third stage of labor
    Mahajan, Niraj N.
    Mahajan, Kshitija
    Soni, Rajani
    GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2007, 64 (02) : 82 - 82
  • [9] Randomized, double-blind trial of caulophyllum D4 for induction of labor after premature rupture of the membranes at term
    Beer, AM
    Heiliger, F
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 1999, 59 (09) : 431 - 435
  • [10] Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: A randomized controlled trial
    Paungmora, N
    Herabutya, Y
    O-Prasertsawat, P
    Punyavachira, P
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2004, 30 (05) : 358 - 362