Ruptured membranes at term: Randomized, double-blind trial of oral misoprostol for labor induction

被引:23
|
作者
Lo, JY [1 ]
Alexander, JM [1 ]
McIntire, DD [1 ]
Leveno, KJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Dallas, TX 75235 USA
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2003年 / 101卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0029-7844(02)03157-5
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To determine if oral misoprostol. can replace oxytocin for labor stimulation in women with ruptured membranes at term and without evidence of labor. METHODS: Nulliparous women at 36 to 41 6/7 weeks with a singleton, cephalic-presenting fetus and ruptured membranes without evidence of labor were randomized to receive oral misoprostol (100 mug) or a placebo every 4 hours for a maximum of two doses. Intravenous oxytocin was initiated if active labor had not ensued within 8 hours of the initial study drug dose. RESULTS: Fifty-one women were randomized to oral misoprostol and 51 women to the placebo. Misoprostol reduced the use of oxytocin stimulation of labor from 90% to 37% (P <.001) and was associated with approximately a 7-hour shorter elapsed time in the labor unit. Uterine hyperactivity, defined as six or more contractions in 10 minutes without fetal heart rate decelerations, occurred in 25% of women randomized to misoprostol. However, uterine hyperactivity associated with fetal heart rate decelerations occurred in only three (6%) women, none of whom required emergency cesarean delivery. Route of delivery and infant outcomes were not related to misoprostol use. CONCLUSION: Oral misoprostol (100 μg) given in a maximum of two doses 4 hours apart significantly reduced the use of oxytocin in the management of women with ruptured membranes without labor at term.
引用
收藏
页码:685 / 689
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Induction of labor with oral misoprostol in women with prelabor rupture of membranes at term
    Rath, Datta Mamta
    Manas, Kabiraj
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2007, 57 (06): : 505 - 508
  • [22] Randomised double-blind placebo controlled trial comparing oral with vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour
    Yenuberi, H.
    Abraham, A.
    Sebastian, A.
    Benjamin, S.
    Londhe, V
    Mathews, J.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 121 : 94 - 95
  • [23] Prospective randomized clinical trial of immediate induction of labor with oral misoprostol for prelabor rupture of the membranes in women with unfavorable cervix at term
    Levy, R
    Vaisbuch, E
    Furman, B
    Doitch, H
    Oron, S
    Hagay, Z
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (06) : S44 - S44
  • [24] A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial comparing stepwise oral misoprostol with vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour
    Yenuberi, Hilda
    Abraham, Anuja
    Sebastian, Ajit
    Benjamin, Santosh J.
    Jeyaseelan, Visalakshi
    Mathews, Jiji E.
    TROPICAL DOCTOR, 2016, 46 (04) : 198 - 205
  • [25] Oral administration of misoprostol for labor induction: A randomized controlled trial - Reply
    Young, DC
    Bennett, K
    Windrim, R
    Mundle, W
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 90 (01): : 154 - 154
  • [26] Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction:: A randomized controlled trial
    Dällenbach, P
    Boulvain, M
    Viardot, C
    Irion, O
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (01) : 162 - 167
  • [27] Oral Misoprostol or vaginal Dinoprostone for labor induction? Randomized controlled trial
    Dallen-Bach, P
    Boulvain, M
    Viardot, C
    Irion, O
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (06) : S108 - S108
  • [28] Propranolol for Induction of Labor in Nulliparas trial a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
    Bigelow, Catherine A.
    Pan, Stephanie
    Overbey, Jessica R.
    Stone, Joanne
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2021, 3 (02)
  • [29] Misoprostol versus Dinoprostone for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial
    Shaheen, Nighat
    Khalil, Safia
    RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 39 (03): : 307 - 310
  • [30] Misoprostol versus dinoprostone for labor induction at term: A randomized controlled trial
    Bebbington, M
    Schmuel, E
    Pevzner, L
    Bernstein, P
    Dayal, A
    Barnhard, J
    Chazotte, C
    Merkatz, I
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (06) : S211 - S211