Double-blind randomized trial of mifepristone in combination with vaginal gemeprost or misoprostol for induction of abortion up to 63 days gestation

被引:45
|
作者
Bartley, J [1 ]
Brown, A [1 ]
Elton, R [1 ]
Baird, DT [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Ctr Reprod Biol, Edinburgh EH3 9ET, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
gemeprost; medical abortion; mifepristone; misoprostol;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/16.10.2098
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Gemeprost and misoprostol are two of the most widely used prostaglandins in combination with mifepristone for medical abortion in early pregnancy. However, the efficacy and side-effects of those two drugs given vaginally have not been assessed in a randomized trial. METHODS: Randomized double-blind controlled trial involving 999 women undergoing an abortion at gestational age less than or equal to 63 days who received either 0.5 mg gemeprost (group 1, n = 499) or 800 mug misoprostol (group II, n = 500) vaginally similar to 48 h after taking 200 mg mifepristone by mouth. The rate of complete abortion and the side-effects were compared between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 89 cases was excluded from full analysis of outcome because either they aborted after mifepristone alone (n = 2), had an ectopic pregnancy (n = 1), or because the outcome was uncertain as they failed to attend their follow-up appointment (n = 86). The rate of complete abortion was very high (> 95%) in both groups but significantly higher after treatment with misoprostol than with gemeprost [436/453 (98.7%) versus 451/457 (96.2%), P = 0.019, difference 2.5%, confidence interval 0.4-4.7%] and there were fewer ongoing pregnancies (n = I versus n = 8, P < 0.018). Surgical intervention rose significantly with gestation in women who received gemeprost (P < 0.03) but not with misoprostol. The incidence of side-effects such as diarrhoea (13.7 versus 16.4%) and vomiting (27.8 versus 29.7%) was similar in women who received misoprostol or gemeprost respectively, as was the duration and amount of bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: (i) Both regimens using a reduced dose of mifepristone are highly effective. methods of inducing abortion in early pregnancy; (ii) vaginal misoprostol is the preferred prostaglandin because it is it is associated with fewer failures than low-dose gemeprost, particularly at gestation greater than or equal to 49 days.
引用
收藏
页码:2098 / 2102
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A randomised controlled trial of mifepristone in combination with misoprostol administered sublingually or vaginally for medical abortion up to 13 weeks of gestation
    Hamoda, H
    Ashok, PW
    Flett, GMM
    Templeton, A
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2005, 112 (08) : 1102 - 1108
  • [32] Cervical Ripening Using Vaginal Misoprostol before Hysteroscopy: A Double-blind Randomized Trial
    Waddell, Guy
    Desindes, Sophie
    Takser, Larissa
    Beauchemin, Marie-Claude
    Bessette, Paul
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 15 (06) : 739 - 744
  • [33] "Comparative study of medical abortion by Mifepristone with vaginal Misoprostol in women < 49 days versus 50-63 days of amenorrhoea"
    Sonali D.
    Kanan Y.
    Ajit D.
    Kapil K.
    The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2010, 60 (5) : 403 - 407
  • [34] Randomized study of sublingual and oral misoprostol following mitepristone 200 mg for abortion up to 63 days' gestation in moldova
    Raghavan, S.
    Comedant, R.
    Winikoff, B.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2007, 76 (02) : 159 - 160
  • [35] Two prophylactic medication approaches in addition to a pain control regimen for early medical abortion < 63 days’ gestation with mifepristone and misoprostol: study protocol for a randomized, controlled trial
    Monica V. Dragoman
    Daniel Grossman
    Nathalie Kapp
    Nguyen My Huong
    Ndema Habib
    Duong Lan Dung
    Anand Tamang
    Reproductive Health, 13
  • [36] A randomized trial of 2 regimens for the administration of vaginal prostaglandins (gemeprost) for the induction of midtrimester abortion
    Armatage, RJ
    Luckas, MJM
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 1996, 36 (03): : 296 - 299
  • [37] Misoprostol in Addition to a Double-Balloon Catheter for Induction: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
    Hill, Meghan G.
    Gonzalez, Maritza G.
    Lo-Ciganic, Wei-Hsuan
    Reed, Kathryn L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2018, 35 (03) : 225 - 232
  • [38] Mifepristone and Oral, Vaginal, or Sublingual Misoprostol for Second-Trimester Abortion A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Dickinson, Jan E.
    Jennings, Belinda G.
    Doherty, Dorota A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 123 (06): : 1162 - 1168
  • [39] Randomised double-blind placebo controlled trial comparing oral with vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour
    Yenuberi, H.
    Abraham, A.
    Sebastian, A.
    Benjamin, S.
    Londhe, V
    Mathews, J.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 121 : 94 - 95
  • [40] Comparison of vaginal and buccal misoprostol after mifepristone for medication abortion through 70 days of gestation: A retrospective chart review
    Young, Danielle
    Fitzgerald, Kelly
    Laursen, Laura
    Whitaker, Amy K.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2022, 115 : 62 - 66