Characterization of on-site digital mammography systems: Direct versus indirect conversion detectors

被引:11
|
作者
Youn, Hanbean [1 ]
Han, Jong Chul [1 ]
Yun, Seungman [1 ]
Kam, Soohwa [1 ]
Cho, Seungryong [2 ]
Kim, Ho Kyung [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Pusan Natl Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Busan 609735, South Korea
[2] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Nucl & Quantum Engn, Taejon 305701, South Korea
[3] Pusan Natl Univ, Ctr Adv Med Engn Res, Busan 609735, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Digital mammography; Cesium iodide; Amorphous selenium; MTF; NPS; DQE; Contrast; MODULATION TRANSFER-FUNCTION; PHYSICAL-CHARACTERISTICS; IMAGING PERFORMANCE; FILM MAMMOGRAPHY; RAY; SIGNAL; RESOLUTION; MTF;
D O I
10.3938/jkps.66.1926
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
We investigated the performances of two digital mammography systems. The systems use a cesium-iodide (CsI) scintillator and an amorphous selenium (a-Se) photoconductor for X-ray detection and are installed in the same hospital. As physical metrics, we measured the modulationtransfer function (MTF), the noise-power spectrum (NPS), and the detective quantum efficiency (DQE). In addition, we analyzed the contrast-detail performances of the two systems by using a commercial contrast-detail phantom. The CsI-based indirect conversion detector provided better MTF and DQE performances than the a-Se-based direct conversion detector whereas the former provided a poorer NPS performance than the latter. These results are explained by the fact that the CsI-based detector used an MTF restoration preprocessing algorithm. The a-Se-based detector showed better contrast-detail performance than the CsI-based detector. We believe that the highfrequency noise characteristic of a detector is more responsible for the visibility of small details than its spatial-resolution performance.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1926 / 1935
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] Techno-economic and environmental assessment of CO2 conversion to methanol: Direct versus indirect conversion routes
    Haghighatjoo, Fatemeh
    Rahimpour, Mohammad Reza
    Farsi, Mohammad
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING AND PROCESSING-PROCESS INTENSIFICATION, 2023, 184
  • [43] Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part I. Technical characterization of the systems
    Marshall, N. W.
    Monnin, P.
    Bosmans, H.
    Bochud, F. O.
    Verdun, F. R.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (14): : 4201 - 4220
  • [45] Evaluation of direct-detection and indirect-detection active matrix, flat-panel imagers (AMFPIs) for digital mammography
    Jee, KW
    Antonuk, LE
    El-Mohri, Y
    Maolinbay, M
    Zhao, QH
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2001: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2001, 4320 : 13 - 23
  • [46] Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens
    Seo, Nieun
    Kim, Hak Hee
    Shin, Hee Jung
    Cha, Joo Hee
    Kim, Hyunji
    Moon, Jin Hee
    Gong, Gyungyub
    Ahn, Sei-Hyun
    Son, Byung Ho
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2014, 55 (06) : 661 - 667
  • [47] Digital elevation models generated by direct and indirect capture systems of source data: accuracy evaluation
    Rosatto, Hector G.
    Presutti, Miriam
    Botta, Guido
    Laureda, Daniel
    Villalba, Gustavo
    Rodriguez Plaza, Luis
    Atencio, Alejandro
    Caso, Cesar
    Gamboa, Paula
    Meyer, Maia
    REVISTA DE LA FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS AGRARIAS, 2009, 41 (02) : 73 - 84
  • [48] Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: Characterization of a small area prototype detector
    Zhao, W
    Ji, WG
    Debrie, A
    Rowlands, JA
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (02) : 254 - 263
  • [49] Full-field digital mammography (FFDM): intraindividual comparison of direct magnification versus monitor zooming in patients with microcalcifications
    Fischer, U
    Baum, F
    Obenauer, S
    Funke, M
    Hermann, KP
    Grabbe, E
    RADIOLOGE, 2002, 42 (04): : 261 - 264
  • [50] Initial characterization of a hybrid direct-indirect active matrix flat panel imager for digital radiography
    Howansky, Adrian
    Mischenko, Anastasiia
    Leveille, Sebastien
    Dow, Scott
    Stavro, Jann
    Goldan, A.
    Scheuermann, James
    Lubinsky, A. R.
    Zhao, Wei
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2020: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2020, 11312