Fluticasone propionate 50 μg BID versus 100 μg BID in the treatment of children with persistent asthma

被引:34
|
作者
Katz, Y [1 ]
Lebas, FX [1 ]
Medley, H [1 ]
Robson, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Assaf Harofeh Med Ctr, Pulm & Allergy Inst, IL-70300 Zerifin, Israel
关键词
fluticasone propionate; dry powder inhaler; children; asthma;
D O I
10.1016/S0149-2918(98)80053-2
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The aim of this multicenter, double-masked study was to compare the efficacy and safety or two different doses of inhaled fluticasone propionate dry powder-50 mu g and 100 100 mu g-administered BID via a multidose powder inhaler with those of placebo in the treatment of children with persistent asthma. After a 2-week run-in period, 263 patients were randomized to treatment with twice-daily placebo (n = 92), fluticasone 50 mu g (n = 85), or fluticasone 100 mu g (n = 86) for 12 weeks. One hundred sixty-six (63%) patients were male, and. 224 (85%) were white, with a mean age of 8 years. Two hundred twenty-one (84%) patients were atopic, and 167 (63%) had been asthmatic for 1 to 5 years. Baseline mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) values were 207 L/min, 199) L/min, and 194 L/min, and baseline percentages of predicted normal values were 86%, 80%, and 81% for the groups receiving placebo, fluticasone 50 mu g, and fluticasone 100 mu g, respectively. At the end of the first week of treatment, patients in both fluticasone groups had significantly greater improvements in morning PEF than did those receiving placebo. Patients experienced mean increases of 4 L/min, 22 L/min, and 26 L/min with placebo, fluticasone 50 mu g, and fluticasone 100 pg, respectively, At the end point (the last evaluable visit), patients in both fluticasone groups continued to have significantly greater improvements in morning PEF than did patients receiving placebo. Patients experienced mean increases of 17 L/min, 50 L/min, and 57 L/min with placebo, fluticasone 50 mu g, and fluticasone 100 mu g, respectively. Changes in the percentage of predicted values by end point were 8%, 20%, and 26% with placebo, fluticasone 50 mu g, and fluticasone 100 mu g, respectively The probability of remaining in the study, according to predefined withdrawal criteria, indicated a significant treatment difference in favor of fluticasone. Withdrawal criteria were met by 63%, 42%, and 29% of patients receiving placebo, fluticasone 50 mu g, and fluticasone 100 mu g, respectively. This study clearly demonstrates the superiority of fluticasone 50 and 100 mu g BID over placebo in the treatment of persistent asthma in children.
引用
收藏
页码:424 / 437
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Beclometasone dipropionate extrafine aerosol versus fluticasone propionate in children with asthma
    van Aalderen, W. M. C.
    Price, D.
    De Baets, F. M.
    Price, J.
    RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2007, 101 (07) : 1585 - 1593
  • [42] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF SALMETEROL/FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE COMBINATION VERSUS LEUKOTRIENE MONTELUKAST FOR THE CONTROL OF PERSISTENT ASTHMA IN CHILDREN
    Rely, K.
    Gonzalez, S. E.
    Alexandre, P. K.
    Salinas, G. E.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2010, 13 (07) : A323 - A324
  • [43] Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (50/500 μg) in combination in a Diskus® inhaler (Seretide®) is effective and safe in the treatment of steroid-dependent asthma
    Aubier, M
    Pieters, WR
    Schlösser, NJJ
    Steinmetz, KO
    RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 1999, 93 (12) : 876 - 884
  • [44] Initial treatment of symptomatic mild to moderate bronchial asthma with the salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (50/250 μg) combination product (SAS 40023)
    Baumgarten, C
    Geldszus, R
    Behre, U
    Peslis, N
    Trautmann, M
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2002, 7 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [45] Fluticasone propionate 750μg/day versus beclomethasone dipropionate 1500μg/day:: comparison of efficacy and adrenal function in paediatric asthma
    Fitzgerald, D
    Van Asperen, P
    Mellis, C
    Honner, M
    Smith, L
    Ambler, G
    THORAX, 1998, 53 (08) : 656 - 661
  • [46] Cost-Efficacy Analysis of Fluticasone Propionate versus Zafirlukast in Patients with Persistent Asthma
    Rogelio Menendez
    Richard H. Stanford
    Lisa Edwards
    Christopher Kalberg
    Kathleen Rickard
    PharmacoEconomics, 2001, 19 : 865 - 874
  • [47] Cost-efficacy analysis of fluticasone propionate versus zafirlukast in patients with persistent asthma
    Menendez, R
    Stanford, RH
    Edwards, L
    Kalberg, C
    Rickard, K
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2001, 19 (08) : 865 - 874
  • [48] Formoterol, 24 μg bid, and serious asthma exacerbations -: Similar rates compared with formoterol, 12 μg bid, with and without extra doses taken on demand, and placebo
    Wolfe, J
    LaForce, C
    Friedman, B
    Sokol, W
    Till, D
    Della Cioppa, G
    van As, A
    CHEST, 2006, 129 (01) : 27 - 38
  • [49] A cost effectiveness analysis of inhaled fluticasone propionate (Flovent®) versus zafirlukast (Accolate®) in the treatment of patients with persistent asthma
    Rosenzweig, JC
    Bowers, B
    Edwards, L
    Stanford, R
    Srebro, S
    Rickard, K
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 159 (03) : A760 - A760
  • [50] A comparison of fluticasone propionate 250 μg/day with beclomethasone dipropionate 500 μg/day in adult asthma
    Radulovic, S
    Stankovic, I
    ALLERGY, 2002, 57 : 340 - 340