Fluticasone propionate 50 μg BID versus 100 μg BID in the treatment of children with persistent asthma

被引:34
|
作者
Katz, Y [1 ]
Lebas, FX [1 ]
Medley, H [1 ]
Robson, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Assaf Harofeh Med Ctr, Pulm & Allergy Inst, IL-70300 Zerifin, Israel
关键词
fluticasone propionate; dry powder inhaler; children; asthma;
D O I
10.1016/S0149-2918(98)80053-2
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The aim of this multicenter, double-masked study was to compare the efficacy and safety or two different doses of inhaled fluticasone propionate dry powder-50 mu g and 100 100 mu g-administered BID via a multidose powder inhaler with those of placebo in the treatment of children with persistent asthma. After a 2-week run-in period, 263 patients were randomized to treatment with twice-daily placebo (n = 92), fluticasone 50 mu g (n = 85), or fluticasone 100 mu g (n = 86) for 12 weeks. One hundred sixty-six (63%) patients were male, and. 224 (85%) were white, with a mean age of 8 years. Two hundred twenty-one (84%) patients were atopic, and 167 (63%) had been asthmatic for 1 to 5 years. Baseline mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) values were 207 L/min, 199) L/min, and 194 L/min, and baseline percentages of predicted normal values were 86%, 80%, and 81% for the groups receiving placebo, fluticasone 50 mu g, and fluticasone 100 mu g, respectively. At the end of the first week of treatment, patients in both fluticasone groups had significantly greater improvements in morning PEF than did those receiving placebo. Patients experienced mean increases of 4 L/min, 22 L/min, and 26 L/min with placebo, fluticasone 50 mu g, and fluticasone 100 pg, respectively, At the end point (the last evaluable visit), patients in both fluticasone groups continued to have significantly greater improvements in morning PEF than did patients receiving placebo. Patients experienced mean increases of 17 L/min, 50 L/min, and 57 L/min with placebo, fluticasone 50 mu g, and fluticasone 100 mu g, respectively. Changes in the percentage of predicted values by end point were 8%, 20%, and 26% with placebo, fluticasone 50 mu g, and fluticasone 100 mu g, respectively The probability of remaining in the study, according to predefined withdrawal criteria, indicated a significant treatment difference in favor of fluticasone. Withdrawal criteria were met by 63%, 42%, and 29% of patients receiving placebo, fluticasone 50 mu g, and fluticasone 100 mu g, respectively. This study clearly demonstrates the superiority of fluticasone 50 and 100 mu g BID over placebo in the treatment of persistent asthma in children.
引用
收藏
页码:424 / 437
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate (250 μg)/salmeterol (50 μg) combined in the diskus inhaler for the treatment of COPD
    Hanania, NA
    Darken, P
    Horstman, D
    Reisner, C
    Lee, B
    Davis, S
    Shah, T
    CHEST, 2003, 124 (03) : 834 - 843
  • [32] Cost-effectiveness of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (500/50 μg) in the treatment of COPD
    Earnshaw, Stephanie R.
    Wilson, Michele R.
    Dalal, Anand A.
    Chambers, Mike G.
    Jhingran, Priti
    Stanford, Richard
    Mapel, Douglas W.
    RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2009, 103 (01) : 12 - 21
  • [33] Steroid-sparing effects of fluticasone propionate 100 μg and salmeterol 50 μg administered twice daily in a single product in patients previously controlled with fluticasone propionate 250 μg administered twice daily
    Busse, W
    Koenig, SM
    Oppenheimer, J
    Sahn, SA
    Yancey, SW
    Reilly, D
    Edwards, LD
    Dorinsky, PM
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2003, 111 (01) : 57 - 65
  • [34] Fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination compared with montelukast for the treatment of persistent asthma
    Pearlman, DS
    White, MV
    Lieberman, AK
    Pepsin, PJ
    Kalberg, C
    Emmett, A
    Bowers, B
    Rickard, KA
    Dorinsky, P
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2002, 88 (02) : 227 - 235
  • [35] Comparison of the efficacy of inhaled fluticasone propionate, 880 μg/day, with flunisolide, 1500 μg/day, in moderate-to-severe persistent asthma
    Sheikh, S
    Goldsmith, LJ
    Howell, L
    Eid, N
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 1999, 83 (04) : 300 - 304
  • [36] Cost-effectiveness comparison of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate versus montelukast in the treatment of adults with persistent asthma
    Sheth, K
    Borker, R
    Emmett, A
    Rickard, K
    Dorinsky, P
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2002, 20 (13) : 909 - 918
  • [37] Cost-Effectiveness Comparison of Salmeterol/Fluticasone Propionate versus Montelukast in the Treatment of Adults with Persistent Asthma
    Ketan Sheth
    Rohit Borker
    Amanda Emmett
    Kathleen Rickard
    Paul Dorinsky
    PharmacoEconomics, 2002, 20 : 909 - 918
  • [38] Control of airway inflammation maintained at a lower steroid dose with 100/50 μg of fluticasone propionate/saimeterol
    Jarjour, Nizar N.
    Wilson, Susan J.
    Koenig, Steven M.
    Laviolette, Michel
    Moore, Wendy C.
    Davis, W. Bruce
    Doherty, Dennis E.
    Hamid, Qutayba
    Israel, Elliott
    Kavuru, Mani S.
    Ramsdell, Joe W.
    Tashkin, Donald P.
    Reilly, Donna S.
    Yancey, Steven W.
    Edwards, Lisa D.
    Stauffer, John L.
    Dorinsky, Paul M.
    Djukanovic, Ratko
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2006, 118 (01) : 44 - 52
  • [39] Risk of Asthma Exacerbation, Asthma-Related Health Care Utilization and Costs, and Adherence to Controller Therapy in Patients with Asthma Receiving Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol Inhalation Powder 100 μg/50 μg Versus Mometasone Furoate Inhalation Powder
    Hagiwara, May
    Delea, Thomas E.
    Stanford, Richard H.
    JOURNAL OF ASTHMA, 2013, 50 (03) : 287 - 295
  • [40] The efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate in very young children with persistent asthma symptoms
    Carlsen, KCL
    Stick, S
    Kamin, W
    Cirule, I
    Hughes, S
    Wixon, C
    RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2005, 99 (11) : 1393 - 1402