Fluticasone propionate 50 μg BID versus 100 μg BID in the treatment of children with persistent asthma

被引:34
|
作者
Katz, Y [1 ]
Lebas, FX [1 ]
Medley, H [1 ]
Robson, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Assaf Harofeh Med Ctr, Pulm & Allergy Inst, IL-70300 Zerifin, Israel
关键词
fluticasone propionate; dry powder inhaler; children; asthma;
D O I
10.1016/S0149-2918(98)80053-2
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The aim of this multicenter, double-masked study was to compare the efficacy and safety or two different doses of inhaled fluticasone propionate dry powder-50 mu g and 100 100 mu g-administered BID via a multidose powder inhaler with those of placebo in the treatment of children with persistent asthma. After a 2-week run-in period, 263 patients were randomized to treatment with twice-daily placebo (n = 92), fluticasone 50 mu g (n = 85), or fluticasone 100 mu g (n = 86) for 12 weeks. One hundred sixty-six (63%) patients were male, and. 224 (85%) were white, with a mean age of 8 years. Two hundred twenty-one (84%) patients were atopic, and 167 (63%) had been asthmatic for 1 to 5 years. Baseline mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) values were 207 L/min, 199) L/min, and 194 L/min, and baseline percentages of predicted normal values were 86%, 80%, and 81% for the groups receiving placebo, fluticasone 50 mu g, and fluticasone 100 mu g, respectively. At the end of the first week of treatment, patients in both fluticasone groups had significantly greater improvements in morning PEF than did those receiving placebo. Patients experienced mean increases of 4 L/min, 22 L/min, and 26 L/min with placebo, fluticasone 50 mu g, and fluticasone 100 pg, respectively, At the end point (the last evaluable visit), patients in both fluticasone groups continued to have significantly greater improvements in morning PEF than did patients receiving placebo. Patients experienced mean increases of 17 L/min, 50 L/min, and 57 L/min with placebo, fluticasone 50 mu g, and fluticasone 100 mu g, respectively. Changes in the percentage of predicted values by end point were 8%, 20%, and 26% with placebo, fluticasone 50 mu g, and fluticasone 100 mu g, respectively The probability of remaining in the study, according to predefined withdrawal criteria, indicated a significant treatment difference in favor of fluticasone. Withdrawal criteria were met by 63%, 42%, and 29% of patients receiving placebo, fluticasone 50 mu g, and fluticasone 100 mu g, respectively. This study clearly demonstrates the superiority of fluticasone 50 and 100 mu g BID over placebo in the treatment of persistent asthma in children.
引用
收藏
页码:424 / 437
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 μg versus salmeterol 50 μg after chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation
    Jill A Ohar
    Glenn D Crater
    Amanda Emmett
    Thomas J Ferro
    Andrea N Morris
    Ibrahim Raphiou
    Peruvemba S Sriram
    Mark T Dransfield
    Respiratory Research, 15
  • [22] Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol and Exercise-Induced Asthma in Children With Persistent Asthma
    Pearlman, David
    Qaqundah, Paul
    Matz, Jonathan
    Yancey, Steven W.
    Stempel, David A.
    Ortega, Hector G.
    PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY, 2009, 44 (05) : 429 - 435
  • [23] Effect of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (250/50 μg) or salmeterol (50 μg) on COPD exacerbations
    Ferguson, Gary T.
    Anzueto, Antonio
    Fei, Richard
    Emmett, Amanda
    Knobil, Katharine
    Kalberg, Christopher
    RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2008, 102 (08) : 1099 - 1108
  • [24] A comparative study of inhaled ciclesonide 160 μg/day and fluticasone propionate 176 μg/day in children with asthma
    Pedersen, S.
    Garcia, M. L. Garcia
    Manjra, Al
    Theron, I.
    Engelstaetter, R.
    PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY, 2006, 41 (10) : 954 - 961
  • [25] Comparison of olopatadine 0.6% nasal spray versus fluticasone propionate 50 μg in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis
    Kaliner, Michael A.
    Storms, William
    Tilles, Stephen
    Spector, Sheldon
    Tan, Ricardo
    LaForce, Craig
    Lanier, Bobby Q.
    Chipps, Bradley
    ALLERGY AND ASTHMA PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 30 (03) : 255 - 262
  • [26] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Salmeterol/Fluticasone Propionate 50/500μg vs Fluticasone Propionate 500μg in Patients with Corticosteroid-Dependent Asthma V: Results
    Willem R. Pieters
    Bo Lundbäck
    Seema Sondhi
    Martin J. Price
    Robert M.A. Thwaites
    PharmacoEconomics, 1999, 16 : 29 - 34
  • [27] Cost-effectiveness analysis of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate 50/500μg vs fluticasone propionate 500μg in patients with corticosteroid-dependent asthma V:: Results
    Pieters, WR
    Lundbäck, B
    Sondhi, S
    Price, MJ
    Thwaites, RMA
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1999, 16 (Suppl 2) : 29 - 34
  • [28] Low-dose inhaled fluticasone propionate versus oral zafirlukast in the treatment of persistent asthma
    Bleecker, ER
    Welch, MJ
    Weinstein, SF
    Kalberg, C
    Johnson, M
    Edwards, L
    Rickard, KA
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2000, 105 (06) : 1123 - 1129
  • [29] Fluticasone propionate in the treatment of asthma in children: Efficacy and safety
    Williams, J
    REVIEWS IN CONTEMPORARY PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1998, 9 (08): : 581 - 590
  • [30] Efficacy and safety of dry powder fluticasone propionate in children with persistent asthma
    LaForce, CF
    Pearlman, DS
    Ruff, ME
    Silvers, WS
    Weinstein, SW
    Clements, DS
    Brown, A
    Duke, S
    Harding, SM
    House, KW
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2000, 85 (05) : 407 - 415