Long Term Evaluation of Advanced PCC System for Coal-fired Power Plant

被引：2

作者：

Arakawa, Jun ^{[1
]}

Okuno, Shinya ^{[2
]}

Takano, Kenji ^{[1
]}

Yamanaka, Yasuro ^{[1
]}

Matsuyama, Toshiya ^{[1
]}

Feron, Paul ^{[3
]}

Cottrell, Aaron ^{[3
]}

Cousins, Ashleigh ^{[4
]}

Huang, Sanger ^{[4
]}

Davies, Roland ^{[5
]}

Sertori, Paul ^{[5
]}

机构：

[1] IHI Corp, Energy & Plant Operat, Koto Ku, 1-1,Toyosu 3 Chome, Tokyo 1358710, Japan

[2] IHI Corp, Corp Res & Dev, Isogo Ku, 1,Shin Nakahara Cho, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2358501, Japan

[3] CSIRO Energy, POB 330, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia

[4] CSIRO Energy, POB 883, Kenmore, Qld 4069, Australia

[5] AGL Loy Yang, Bartons Lane, Traralgon, Vic 3844, Australia

来源：

13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-13 | 2017年 / 114卷

关键词：

Post combustion; CO2; capture; amine solvent; coal fired power plant; Demonstration;

D O I：

10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1253

中图分类号：

X [环境科学、安全科学];

学科分类号：

08 ; 0830 ;

摘要：

IHI, with technical support from CSIRO, designed and constructed the "PICA pilot plant", for the continued development of an advanced PCC process, which will enable a reduction in the CO2 capture absorbent regeneration energy by 40% compared to the conventional MEA based process. The project team installed the pilot plant at the AGL Loy Yang power plant in Australia. The pilot plant has been commissioned and tested in a conventional MEA based process configuration and has commenced a 5,000 hour operating campaign using the IHI absorbent and the IHI optimized process configuration, and had achieved 1,800 hours of operationby mid September, 2016. The designed CO2 capture ratio of 90% has been achieved and stable plant operation has been confirmed. Continuous analysis will be kept for confirming the performance and robustness of the system. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

引用

页码：1061 / 1068

页数：8

共 50 条

[31] Evaluation of environmental impacts of the Figueira Coal-Fired Power Plant, Parana, Brazil
Kalkreuth, W.
Levandowski, J.
Delgado, T.
Scheffer, R.
Maia, S. M.
Peralba, M. C. R.
Barrionuevo, S.
ENERGY EXPLORATION & EXPLOITATION, 2014, 32 (03) : 423 - 469
[32] Pricing tomorrow's coal-fired power plant
Cooney, Catherine M.
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 41 (10) : 3396 - 3397
[33] Mercury emissions of a coal-fired power plant in Germany
Weigelt, Andreas
Slemr, Franz
Ebinghaus, Ralf
Pirrone, Nicola
Bieser, Johannes
Boedewadt, Jan
Esposito, Giulio
van Velthoven, Peter F. J.
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2016, 16 (21) : 13653 - 13668
[34] Economics of a coal-fired power plant - exergy approach
Ziher, D
Poredos, A
Zager, M
Proceedings of ECOS 2005, Vols 1-3: SHAPING OUR FUTURE ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2005, : 519 - 525
[35] Should a coal-fired power plant be replaced or retrofitted?
Patino-Echeverri, Dalia
Morel, Benoit
Apt, Jay
Chen, Chao
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 41 (23) : 7980 - 7986
[36] Coal-fired power plant costs will plunge by 2005
不详
POWER ENGINEERING, 1996, 100 (01) : 5 - 5
[37] High efficiency coal-fired power plant of the future
Lobachyov, KV
Richter, HJ
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 38 (15-17) : 1693 - 1699
[38] Exergy evaluation of solar aided coal-fired power generation system
Hou, Hongjuan
Wang, Mengjiao
Yang, Yongping
Zhongguo Dianji Gongcheng Xuebao/Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering, 2015, 35 (01): : 119 - 125
[39] Risk assessment of explosion in coal-fired power plant
Lebecki, K.
Rosmus, P.
SAFETY AND RELIABILITY FOR MANAGING RISK, VOLS 1-3, 2006, : 2185 - +
[40] Exergetic and thermoeconomic analyses of a coal-fired power plant
Uysal, Cuneyt
Kurt, Huseyin
Kwak, Ho-Young
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES, 2017, 117 : 106 - 120

← 1 2 3 4 5 →