Antioxidant and Sensorial Properties: Meat Analogues versus Conventional Meat Products

被引:8
|
作者
Abdullah, Fouad Ali Abdullah [1 ]
Dordevic, Dani [2 ]
Kabourkova, Eliska [1 ]
Zemancova, Johana [2 ]
Dordevic, Simona [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vet Sci Brno, Fac Vet Hyg & Ecol, Dept Food Hyg & Technol Anim Origin & Gastron, Palackeho Tr 1946-1, Brno 61242, Czech Republic
[2] Univ Vet Sci, Fac Vet Hyg & Ecol, Dept Plant Origin Food Scinces, Brno 61242, Czech Republic
关键词
polyphenol; DPPH; FRAP; CUPRAC; ABTS; IN-VITRO; ALTERNATIVES; PLANT; GENISTEIN; EXTRACT; ASSAYS;
D O I
10.3390/pr10091864
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Meat-product alternatives have become more popular among consumers, mainly due to concern for animal welfare and demand for more eco-friendly production. This study focused on the comparison between the antioxidant capacities of selected types of meat products and those of their plant-based alternatives. The analogues of the following products were analyzed: minced meat, burger, steak, Hungarian sausages, Frankfurter sausages and salami. Total polyphenol contents and antioxidant capacities and sensory profiles of the products were determined. The highest polyphenol content (1.85 mg Gallic acid/g) and antioxidant capacity values (DPPH: 41.80% inhibition, CUPRAC: 9.21 Trolox mmol/kg, FRAP: 7.51 mmol/g, ABTS: 7.45% inhibition) were observed in the analogue samples of Hungarian sausages due to the oat flour presence in these products. The results indicated that antioxidant properties of meat analogue products (plant sources) were superior compared to conventional meat products (produced from animal sources). The sensorial attributes indicated no significant (p > 0.05) differences in taste (except the Frankfurter sausages). The novelty of the study can be seen in the fact that it confirmed that the sensory properties of meat analogue products can be close to those of traditional meat products.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] REPORT ON MEAT AND MEAT PRODUCTS
    COOK, HR
    JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF OFFICIAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTS, 1970, 53 (02): : 329 - &
  • [22] REPORT ON MEAT AND MEAT PRODUCTS
    PHILBECK, RH
    JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF OFFICIAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTS, 1968, 51 (02): : 289 - &
  • [23] REPORT ON MEAT AND MEAT PRODUCTS
    MEHURIN, RM
    JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF OFFICIAL AGRICULTURAL CHEMISTS, 1955, 38 (02): : 200 - 201
  • [24] Microbiology of meat and meat products
    Kofoth, CM
    FLEISCHWIRTSCHAFT, 1998, 78 (07): : 817 - 819
  • [25] REPORT ON MEAT + MEAT PRODUCTS
    PHILBECK, RH
    JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF OFFICIAL AGRICULTURAL CHEMISTS, 1964, 47 (01): : 61 - +
  • [26] REPORT ON MEAT AND MEAT PRODUCTS
    PHILBECK, RH
    JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF OFFICIAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTS, 1969, 52 (02): : 248 - &
  • [27] Ochratoxin A in meat and meat products
    Gareis, M
    Scheuer, R
    ARCHIV FUR LEBENSMITTELHYGIENE, 2000, 51 (4-5): : 102 - 104
  • [28] QUALITY IN MEAT AND MEAT PRODUCTS
    HANKINS, OG
    INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY, 1945, 37 (03): : 220 - 223
  • [29] REPORT ON MEAT AND MEAT PRODUCTS
    PHILBECK, RH
    JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF OFFICIAL AGRICULTURAL CHEMISTS, 1965, 48 (01): : 125 - +
  • [30] REPORT ON MEAT AND MEAT PRODUCTS
    MEHURIN, RM
    JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF OFFICIAL AGRICULTURAL CHEMISTS, 1951, 34 (02): : 355 - 355