Mechanical resistance of screwless morse taper and screw-retained implant-abutment connections

被引:33
|
作者
Ugurel, Cihan Sadi [1 ]
Steiner, Martin [2 ]
Isik-Ozkol, Gul [1 ]
Kutay, Omer [1 ]
Kern, Matthias [2 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, TR-34093 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Univ Kiel, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont Propaedeut & Dent Mat, Kiel, Germany
关键词
dental implant-abutment connection; mechanical strength; morse taper; PROSPECTIVE CLINICAL-EVALUATION; SINGLE-TOOTH REPLACEMENTS; FIXED PARTIAL DENTURES; LEAST; 5; YEARS; COMPLICATION RATES; OBSERVATION PERIOD; IN-VITRO; BRANEMARK IMPLANTS; INTERFACE DESIGN; DENTAL IMPLANTS;
D O I
10.1111/clr.12303
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThe screwless morse taper (SMT) implant-abutment connection is an alternative to conventional external or internal screw-retained (ISR) connections. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate mechanical resistance of the SMT connection and to compare it with three different ISR connections. Materials and MethodsFour implant systems were tested in this study: SMT system; Tasarimmed Octo (Istanbul, Turkey), ISR systems; Straumann Bone Level (Basel, Switzerland), Biohorizons Internal (Birmingham, AL, USA), and Dentsply Friadent Xive (Mannheim, Germany). Overall, 64 specimens with stylized single crowns were prepared: 32 for dynamic loading (DL) and 32 for static loading (SL). DL was carried out using a chewing simulator with 120N at 1.75Hz for 1.2x10(6) cycles, and SL was performed with a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 2mm/min with an angulation of 30 degrees. Cycles until failure from DL and fracture/bending loads at SL were recorded. Statistical analyses were made with Dunn's multiple comparison. ResultsMedian cycles until failure in DL were as follows: Octo 86,354 (24,810-153,875), Straumann 1,200,000 (1,156,618-1,200,000), Biohorizons 539,719 (437,224-858,732), Xive 139,411 (139,411-139,411). Median fracture/bending loads in Newton at SL were as follows: Octo 429.6 (404.5-482.7), Straumann 574.6 (544.6-629.9), Biohorizons 548.7 (532.9-567.3), Xive 431.5 (412.5-520.5). There were significant differences between the implant systems under both loading conditions (P0.05) revealing that the Octo implant system's SMT connection showed significantly lower cycles to failures and lower fracture/bending loads compared with the ISR connections of the Straumann and Biohorizons implant systems. However, there was no significant difference compared with the Xive implant system. ConclusionThe mechanical resistance of the screwless morse taper implant system is lower than that of the ISR implant systems that might result in more frequent clinical complications.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 142
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical Comparison of Screw-Retained and Screwless Morse Taper Implant-Abutment Connections: One-Year Postloading Results
    Geckili, Esma
    Geckili, Onur
    Bilhan, Hakan
    Kutay, Omer
    Bilgin, Tayfun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2017, 32 (05) : 1123 - 1131
  • [2] The Mechanical Behavior of a Screwless Morse Taper Implant-Abutment Connection: An In Vitro Study
    Bagegni, Aimen
    Weihrauch, Vincent
    Vach, Kirstin
    Kohal, Ralf
    MATERIALS, 2022, 15 (09)
  • [3] Determination of fluid leakages in the different screw-retained implant-abutment connections in a mechanical artificial mouth
    D. Martin-Gili
    M. Molmeneu
    M. Fernandez
    M. Punset
    Ll. Giner
    J. Armengou
    F. Javier Gil
    Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2015, 26
  • [4] Determination of fluid leakages in the different screw-retained implant-abutment connections in a mechanical artificial mouth
    Martin-Gili, D.
    Molmeneu, M.
    Fernandez, M.
    Punset, M.
    Giner, Ll
    Armengou, J.
    Gil, F. Javier
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE-MATERIALS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 26 (07)
  • [5] Bacterial penetration in the internal part of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-abutment connections.
    Di Labio, L
    Piattelli, A
    Assenza, B
    Leghissa, GC
    Scarano, A
    Paolantonio, M
    Piccolomini, R
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 : 213 - 213
  • [6] Fluids and microbial penetration in the internal part of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-abutment connections
    Piattelli, A
    Scarano, A
    Paolantonio, M
    Assenza, B
    Leghissa, GC
    Di Bonaventura, G
    Catamo, G
    Piccolomini, R
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2001, 72 (09) : 1146 - 1150
  • [7] Mechanical Resistance of a 2.9-mm-Diameter Dental Implant With a Morse-Taper Implant-Abutment Connection
    Alberti, Alice
    Corbella, Stefano
    Francetti, Luca
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2023, 49 (03) : 323 - 329
  • [8] Dynamic fatigue resistance of implant-abutment junction in an internally notched morse-taper oral implant:: influence of abutment design
    Çehreli, MC
    Akça, K
    Iplikçioglu, H
    Sahin, S
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2004, 15 (04) : 459 - 465
  • [9] An In Vitro Investigation Concerning the Bacterial Leakage at Implants With Internal Hexagon and Morse Taper Implant-Abutment Connections
    Tripodi, Domenico
    Vantaggiato, Giovanni
    Scarano, Antonio
    Perrotti, Vittoria
    Piattelli, Adriano
    Iezzi, Giovanna
    D'Ercole, Simonetta
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2012, 21 (04) : 335 - 339
  • [10] New abutment for a screw-retained, implant-supported crown
    Prisco, R
    Morgano, SM
    D'Amato, S
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2001, 85 (01): : 30 - 33