Utilization of tracheostomy in craniomaxillofacial trauma at a level-1 trauma center

被引:23
|
作者
Holmgren, Eric F.
Bagheri, Sbabrokb
Bell, Bryan
Bobek, Sam
Dierks, Eric J.
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Portland, OR 97209 USA
[2] Legacy Emanuel Hosp & Hlth Ctr, Oral & Maxillofacial Surg Serv, Portland, OR USA
[3] Emory Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[4] Oral Facial Surg, Private Practice, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2007.05.019
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The decision to perform a tracheostomy on patients with maxillofacial trauma is complex. There is little data exploring the role of tracheostomy in facial fracture management. We sought to profile the utilization of tracheostomy in the context of maxillofacial trauma at our institution by comparing patients who required tracheostomy with and without facial fractures versus those with facial fractures not requiring tracheostomy. Materials and Methods: All patients admitted to the Trauma Service at Legacy Emanuel Hospital and Health Center (LEHHC), Portland, OR, from 1993 to 2003 that sustained facial fractures or underwent tracheostomy were identified and data were retrospectively reviewed using patient charts and the trauma registry. Variables such as age, gender, death, injury severity score (ISS), facial injury severity score (FISS), Glasgow coma score (GCS), intensive care days (ICU), hospital length of stay (LOS), facial fracture profile, and oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) operative intervention were tabulated and analyzed. Data were divided into 3 groups for comparison: group I (ffxT) consisted of patients who underwent a tracheostomy procedure and repair of their facial fracture during the SAME operation by the OMFS department (N = 125); group 2 (ffxNT) were those patients who had repair of their facial fractures by OMFS and did not require a tracheostomy (N = 224); and group 3 (NffxT) were patients who did not have facial fractures but received a tracheostomy during their hospitalization (N = 259). Ten-year data were used to 2 analyze the ffxT and 5-year data were used to analyze the ffxNT and NffxT. Analysis of variance and X testing was used for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 18,187 patients were admitted to the trauma LEHHC Trauma Service during the study period, of which 1,079 (5.9%) patients sustained facial fractures and 788 (4.3%) required a tracheostomy. One hundred twenty-five patients (0.69% of total; 11.6% of facial fracture) received a tracheostomy at the same time as the facial fracture repair. All patients had their facial fractures successfully managed, regardless of the type of method used to stabilize the airway. There were no known cases of tracheal stenosis, severe bleeding requiring a return to the operating room, airway obstruction, or loss of secured airway. Mates were the predominate gender in all 3 groups. The NffxT group (mean, 44.9 years) was much older compared with the ffxT (mean, 36.2 years) and ffxNT (mean, 30.9 years) groups. The incidence of death was higher in the tracheostomy groups compared with 0% with the non-tracheostomy group. The ffxNT group had a statistically significant higher GCS with an average of 12.4 when compared with the trachcostomy groups (ffxT = 6.8; NffxT = 6.7). ISS was nearly the same in the tracheostomy group (ffxT = 28.45; NffxT = 30.04), but higher when compared with the ffxNT (ISS = 17.33). All 3 groups were much different in terms of LOS and ICU days, in which the NffxT group had an average hospital LOS and ICU days of 34.4 and 16.56, respectively. This was higher when compared with the ffxT (LOS = 19.71 days; ICU = 7.21 days) and ftxNT (LOS = 6.82 days; ICU = 1.33 days) groups. The FISS averaged 6.22 in the ffxT group and was higher compared with an FISS of 3.16 in the ffxNT group. Overall, the fracture profile was different between the tracheostomy and non-tracheostomy groups. There was a higher prevalence of mandibular fractures, multiple mandibular fractures, and Le Fort III fractures in the ffxT group compared with the ffxNT group. Conclusion: Tracheostomy is commonly performed in the context of multisystem trauma and is a safe method for airway stabilization in patients with craniomaxillofacial trauma. Multi-institutional collaboration and a prospective, randomized trial measuring outcome, resource utilization, and length of ICU stay is necessary to determine if tracheostomy is indeed of measurable benefit to patients with complex injuries. (c) 2007 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:2005 / 2010
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effects of Trauma Center Consolidation on Adult Trauma at a Rural Level 1 Trauma Center
    Heard, Matthew A.
    Bray, Sheree
    Archer, Allen
    O'Quinn, Payton C.
    Wheeler, Hannah
    Leonard, Matthew
    Burns, J. Bracken
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2024, : 1899 - 1903
  • [42] Impact of COVID-19 on hand surgery transfers at a level-1 trauma center
    Stearns, Stephen A. A.
    Beagles, Clay B. B.
    Hegermiller, Katherine
    Harper, Carl M. M.
    CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE, 2023, 34 (03): : 103 - 105
  • [43] AUTOMATED SEVERITY SCORING IN LEVEL-1 TRAUMA PATIENTS
    KEARNEY, TJ
    SHABOT, MM
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 1994, 60 (06) : 391 - 393
  • [44] Male genital trauma at a level 1 trauma center
    Connor S. McCormick
    Mitchell G. Dumais
    Niels V. Johnsen
    Bryan B. Voelzke
    Judith C. Hagedorn
    World Journal of Urology, 2020, 38 : 3283 - 3289
  • [45] Male genital trauma at a level 1 trauma center
    McCormick, Connor S.
    Dumais, Mitchell G.
    Johnsen, Niels V.
    Voelzke, Bryan B.
    Hagedorn, Judith C.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 38 (12) : 3283 - 3289
  • [46] Burden of Maxillofacial Trauma at Level 1 Trauma Center
    Kaul, Ruchi Pathak
    Sagar, Sushma
    Singhal, Maneesh
    Kumar, Abhishek
    Jaipuria, Jiten
    Misra, Mahesh
    CRANIOMAXILLOFACIAL TRAUMA & RECONSTRUCTION, 2014, 7 (02) : 126 - 130
  • [47] Craniomaxillofacial Trauma
    Streubel, Sven-Olrik
    Mirsky, David M.
    FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2016, 24 (04) : 605 - +
  • [48] Identifying trauma patients with benefit from direct transportation to Level-1 trauma centers
    Charlie A. Sewalt
    Benjamin Y. Gravesteijn
    Daan Nieboer
    Ewout W. Steyerberg
    Dennis Den Hartog
    David Van Klaveren
    BMC Emergency Medicine, 21
  • [49] Maintaining Trauma Care Access During the COVID-19 Pandemic An Urban, Level-1 Trauma Center's Experience
    Coleman, Julia R.
    Burlew, Clay Cothren
    Platnick, Kenneth B.
    Campion, Eric
    Pieracci, Fredric
    Lawless, Ryan
    Werner, Nicole
    Coleman, Jamie
    Hoehn, Melanie
    Moore, Ernest E.
    Cohen, Mitchell J.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2020, 272 (02) : E58 - E60
  • [50] Epidemiology, demographics, and outcomes of craniomaxillofacial gunshot wounds in a Level I trauma center
    Tholpady, Sunil S.
    DeMoss, Patrick
    Murage, Kariuki P.
    Havlik, Robert J.
    Flores, Roberto L.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 42 (05) : 403 - 411