Utilization of tracheostomy in craniomaxillofacial trauma at a level-1 trauma center

被引:23
|
作者
Holmgren, Eric F.
Bagheri, Sbabrokb
Bell, Bryan
Bobek, Sam
Dierks, Eric J.
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Portland, OR 97209 USA
[2] Legacy Emanuel Hosp & Hlth Ctr, Oral & Maxillofacial Surg Serv, Portland, OR USA
[3] Emory Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[4] Oral Facial Surg, Private Practice, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2007.05.019
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The decision to perform a tracheostomy on patients with maxillofacial trauma is complex. There is little data exploring the role of tracheostomy in facial fracture management. We sought to profile the utilization of tracheostomy in the context of maxillofacial trauma at our institution by comparing patients who required tracheostomy with and without facial fractures versus those with facial fractures not requiring tracheostomy. Materials and Methods: All patients admitted to the Trauma Service at Legacy Emanuel Hospital and Health Center (LEHHC), Portland, OR, from 1993 to 2003 that sustained facial fractures or underwent tracheostomy were identified and data were retrospectively reviewed using patient charts and the trauma registry. Variables such as age, gender, death, injury severity score (ISS), facial injury severity score (FISS), Glasgow coma score (GCS), intensive care days (ICU), hospital length of stay (LOS), facial fracture profile, and oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) operative intervention were tabulated and analyzed. Data were divided into 3 groups for comparison: group I (ffxT) consisted of patients who underwent a tracheostomy procedure and repair of their facial fracture during the SAME operation by the OMFS department (N = 125); group 2 (ffxNT) were those patients who had repair of their facial fractures by OMFS and did not require a tracheostomy (N = 224); and group 3 (NffxT) were patients who did not have facial fractures but received a tracheostomy during their hospitalization (N = 259). Ten-year data were used to 2 analyze the ffxT and 5-year data were used to analyze the ffxNT and NffxT. Analysis of variance and X testing was used for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 18,187 patients were admitted to the trauma LEHHC Trauma Service during the study period, of which 1,079 (5.9%) patients sustained facial fractures and 788 (4.3%) required a tracheostomy. One hundred twenty-five patients (0.69% of total; 11.6% of facial fracture) received a tracheostomy at the same time as the facial fracture repair. All patients had their facial fractures successfully managed, regardless of the type of method used to stabilize the airway. There were no known cases of tracheal stenosis, severe bleeding requiring a return to the operating room, airway obstruction, or loss of secured airway. Mates were the predominate gender in all 3 groups. The NffxT group (mean, 44.9 years) was much older compared with the ffxT (mean, 36.2 years) and ffxNT (mean, 30.9 years) groups. The incidence of death was higher in the tracheostomy groups compared with 0% with the non-tracheostomy group. The ffxNT group had a statistically significant higher GCS with an average of 12.4 when compared with the trachcostomy groups (ffxT = 6.8; NffxT = 6.7). ISS was nearly the same in the tracheostomy group (ffxT = 28.45; NffxT = 30.04), but higher when compared with the ffxNT (ISS = 17.33). All 3 groups were much different in terms of LOS and ICU days, in which the NffxT group had an average hospital LOS and ICU days of 34.4 and 16.56, respectively. This was higher when compared with the ffxT (LOS = 19.71 days; ICU = 7.21 days) and ftxNT (LOS = 6.82 days; ICU = 1.33 days) groups. The FISS averaged 6.22 in the ffxT group and was higher compared with an FISS of 3.16 in the ffxNT group. Overall, the fracture profile was different between the tracheostomy and non-tracheostomy groups. There was a higher prevalence of mandibular fractures, multiple mandibular fractures, and Le Fort III fractures in the ffxT group compared with the ffxNT group. Conclusion: Tracheostomy is commonly performed in the context of multisystem trauma and is a safe method for airway stabilization in patients with craniomaxillofacial trauma. Multi-institutional collaboration and a prospective, randomized trial measuring outcome, resource utilization, and length of ICU stay is necessary to determine if tracheostomy is indeed of measurable benefit to patients with complex injuries. (c) 2007 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:2005 / 2010
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Vascular Surgery Role in Vascular Trauma: 11-Year Analysis of Peripheral Vascular Trauma Management at a Level-1 Trauma Center
    Osofsky, Robin
    Hanif, Hamza
    Massie, Pierce
    Ramey, Shannen
    Miskimins, Richard
    Clark, Ross
    Rana, Muhammad Ali
    Guliani, Sundeep
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 93 : 224 - 233
  • [32] TIMING OF TRACHEOSTOMY IN NEUROTRAUMA PATIENTS: A SINGLE LEVEL 1 TRAUMA CENTER EXPERIENCE
    Kass, Naomi
    Siddiqui, Khwaja
    Gonipath, Shankar
    Tsetsou, Spyridoula
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2025, 53 (01)
  • [33] Facial trauma coverage among level-1 trauma centers of the United States
    Bagheri, Shahrokh C.
    Dimassi, Matt
    Sbahriari, Abtin
    Khan, H. Ali
    Jo, Chris
    Steed, Martin B.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2008, 66 (05) : 963 - 967
  • [34] Emergency department thoracotomy in a physician-staffed trauma system: the experience of a French Military level-1 trauma center
    de Malleray, Hilaire
    Cardinale, Michael
    Avaro, Jean-Philippe
    Meaudre, Eric
    Monchal, Tristan
    Bourgouin, Stephane
    Vasse, Mathieu
    Balandraud, Paul
    de Lesquen, Henri
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2022, 48 (06) : 4631 - 4638
  • [35] Endovascular Repair of Acute Traumatic Aortic Injury: Experience of a Level-1 Trauma Center
    Asaid, Rafik
    Boyce, Glenn
    Atkinson, Noel
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 28 (06) : 1391 - 1395
  • [36] Psychiatry Department Response to the Boston Marathon Bombings Within a Level-1 Trauma Center
    Oser, Megan
    Shah, Sejal B.
    Gitlin, David
    HARVARD REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 23 (03) : 195 - 200
  • [37] Accuracy and influencing factors of the Field Triage Decision Scheme for adult trauma patients at a level-1 trauma center in Korea
    Byung Hee Kang
    Kyoungwon Jung
    Sora Kim
    So Hyun Youn
    Seo Young Song
    Yo Huh
    Hyuk-Jae Chang
    BMC Emergency Medicine, 22
  • [38] Accuracy and influencing factors of the Field Triage Decision Scheme for adult trauma patients at a level-1 trauma center in Korea
    Kang, Byung Hee
    Jung, Kyoungwon
    Kim, Sora
    Youn, So Hyun
    Song, Seo Young
    Huh, Yo
    Chang, Hyuk-Jae
    BMC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [39] Emergency department thoracotomy in a physician-staffed trauma system: the experience of a French Military level-1 trauma center
    Hilaire de Malleray
    Michael Cardinale
    Jean-Philippe Avaro
    Eric Meaudre
    Tristan Monchal
    Stéphane Bourgouin
    Mathieu Vasse
    Paul Balandraud
    Henri de Lesquen
    European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 2022, 48 : 4631 - 4638
  • [40] Hand hygiene in developing nations: Experience at a busy level-1 trauma center in India
    Mathur, Purva
    Jain, Neetu
    Gupta, Amit
    Gunjiyal, Jacinta
    Nair, Sunita
    Misra, M. C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2011, 39 (08) : 705 - 706