Utilization of tracheostomy in craniomaxillofacial trauma at a level-1 trauma center

被引:23
|
作者
Holmgren, Eric F.
Bagheri, Sbabrokb
Bell, Bryan
Bobek, Sam
Dierks, Eric J.
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Portland, OR 97209 USA
[2] Legacy Emanuel Hosp & Hlth Ctr, Oral & Maxillofacial Surg Serv, Portland, OR USA
[3] Emory Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[4] Oral Facial Surg, Private Practice, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2007.05.019
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The decision to perform a tracheostomy on patients with maxillofacial trauma is complex. There is little data exploring the role of tracheostomy in facial fracture management. We sought to profile the utilization of tracheostomy in the context of maxillofacial trauma at our institution by comparing patients who required tracheostomy with and without facial fractures versus those with facial fractures not requiring tracheostomy. Materials and Methods: All patients admitted to the Trauma Service at Legacy Emanuel Hospital and Health Center (LEHHC), Portland, OR, from 1993 to 2003 that sustained facial fractures or underwent tracheostomy were identified and data were retrospectively reviewed using patient charts and the trauma registry. Variables such as age, gender, death, injury severity score (ISS), facial injury severity score (FISS), Glasgow coma score (GCS), intensive care days (ICU), hospital length of stay (LOS), facial fracture profile, and oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) operative intervention were tabulated and analyzed. Data were divided into 3 groups for comparison: group I (ffxT) consisted of patients who underwent a tracheostomy procedure and repair of their facial fracture during the SAME operation by the OMFS department (N = 125); group 2 (ffxNT) were those patients who had repair of their facial fractures by OMFS and did not require a tracheostomy (N = 224); and group 3 (NffxT) were patients who did not have facial fractures but received a tracheostomy during their hospitalization (N = 259). Ten-year data were used to 2 analyze the ffxT and 5-year data were used to analyze the ffxNT and NffxT. Analysis of variance and X testing was used for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 18,187 patients were admitted to the trauma LEHHC Trauma Service during the study period, of which 1,079 (5.9%) patients sustained facial fractures and 788 (4.3%) required a tracheostomy. One hundred twenty-five patients (0.69% of total; 11.6% of facial fracture) received a tracheostomy at the same time as the facial fracture repair. All patients had their facial fractures successfully managed, regardless of the type of method used to stabilize the airway. There were no known cases of tracheal stenosis, severe bleeding requiring a return to the operating room, airway obstruction, or loss of secured airway. Mates were the predominate gender in all 3 groups. The NffxT group (mean, 44.9 years) was much older compared with the ffxT (mean, 36.2 years) and ffxNT (mean, 30.9 years) groups. The incidence of death was higher in the tracheostomy groups compared with 0% with the non-tracheostomy group. The ffxNT group had a statistically significant higher GCS with an average of 12.4 when compared with the trachcostomy groups (ffxT = 6.8; NffxT = 6.7). ISS was nearly the same in the tracheostomy group (ffxT = 28.45; NffxT = 30.04), but higher when compared with the ffxNT (ISS = 17.33). All 3 groups were much different in terms of LOS and ICU days, in which the NffxT group had an average hospital LOS and ICU days of 34.4 and 16.56, respectively. This was higher when compared with the ffxT (LOS = 19.71 days; ICU = 7.21 days) and ftxNT (LOS = 6.82 days; ICU = 1.33 days) groups. The FISS averaged 6.22 in the ffxT group and was higher compared with an FISS of 3.16 in the ffxNT group. Overall, the fracture profile was different between the tracheostomy and non-tracheostomy groups. There was a higher prevalence of mandibular fractures, multiple mandibular fractures, and Le Fort III fractures in the ffxT group compared with the ffxNT group. Conclusion: Tracheostomy is commonly performed in the context of multisystem trauma and is a safe method for airway stabilization in patients with craniomaxillofacial trauma. Multi-institutional collaboration and a prospective, randomized trial measuring outcome, resource utilization, and length of ICU stay is necessary to determine if tracheostomy is indeed of measurable benefit to patients with complex injuries. (c) 2007 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:2005 / 2010
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Prevalence of Missed Injuries in Multiple Trauma Patients at a Level-1 Trauma Center in Saudi Arabia
    Al Babtain, Ibrahim
    Almalki, Yara
    Asiri, Deemah
    Masud, Nazish
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (02)
  • [12] Preventability of trauma deaths in a Dutch Level-1 trauma centre
    Saltzherr, T. P.
    Wendt, K. W.
    Nieboer, P.
    Nijsten, M. W. N.
    Valk, J. P.
    Luitse, J. S. K.
    Ponsen, K. J.
    Goslings, J. C.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2011, 42 (09): : 870 - 873
  • [13] Epidemiology and current treatment of scapula fractures at a level-1 trauma center
    Zimmermann, J.
    Faerber, C.
    Hufnagel, L.
    Fuchs, K.
    Gilbert, F.
    Meffert, R.
    Schmalzl, J.
    OBERE EXTREMITAET-SCHULTER-ELLENBOGEN-HAND-UPPER EXTREMITY-SHOULDER ELBOW HAND, 2025,
  • [14] Injuries following motorcycle crashes at a level-1 trauma center in Riyadh
    Alghnam, Suliman
    Alsulaim, Hatim A.
    BinMuneif, Yasser Abdullah
    Al-Zamil, Abdulmohsen
    Alahmari, Abdullah
    Alshafi, Abdullah
    Alsaif, Ahmad
    Albabtain, Ibrahim
    ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE, 2019, 39 (03) : 185 - 191
  • [15] Impact of establishing a level-1 trauma center for lower extremity trauma: a 4-year experience
    Min Ji Kim
    Kyung Min Yang
    Hyung Min Hahn
    Hyoseob Lim
    Il Jae Lee
    BMC Emergency Medicine, 22
  • [16] Intravenous pantoprazole utilization in a level 1 trauma center
    David A. Edelman
    Krupa R. Patel
    James G. Tyburski
    Lisa G. Hall Zimmerman
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2008, 22 : 967 - 973
  • [17] Intravenous pantoprazole utilization in a level 1 trauma center
    Edelman, David A.
    Patel, Krupa R.
    Tyburski, James G.
    Zimmerman, Lisa G. Hall
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (04): : 967 - 973
  • [18] A Retrospective Look at a Cervical Spine Clearance Protocol in Pediatric Trauma Patients at a Level-1 Trauma Center
    Bailey, Ryan S.
    Klein, Robert
    de los Cobos, Daniel
    Geraud, Simone
    Puryear, Aki
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2022, 42 (06) : E607 - E611
  • [19] Impact of establishing a level-1 trauma center for lower extremity trauma: a 4-year experience
    Kim, Min Ji
    Yang, Kyung Min
    Hahn, Hyung Min
    Lim, Hyoseob
    Lee, Il Jae
    BMC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [20] Childhood obesity: a risk factor for injuries observed at a level-1 trauma center
    Rana, Ankur R.
    Michalsky, Marc P.
    Teich, Steven
    Groner, Jonathon I.
    Caniano, Donna A.
    Schuster, Dara P.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2009, 44 (08) : 1601 - 1605