Evaluation of biomechanical effects of different implant thread designs and diameters on all-on-four concept

被引:1
|
作者
Zor, Z. F. [1 ]
Kilinc, Y. [1 ]
Erkmen, E. [1 ]
Kurt, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Atilim Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Mfg Engn, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
All-on-four; Dental implants; finite element analysis; Mandible; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; DIFFERENT FIXATION METHODS; STRESS-DISTRIBUTION; OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS; ATROPHIC MAXILLA; BONE; LENGTH;
D O I
10.23805/JO.2021.13.03.1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim All-on-four concept involves the use of four anterior dental implants in the edentulous jaw to overcome anatomic limitations of residual alveolar bone. The impact of implant thread design and diameter on the biomechanical performance of all-on-four concept is not yet fully understood. The purpose of this study was to investigate the biomechanical behavior of all-on-four concept with different combinations of thread designs and diameters through a three dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Materials and methods Six three-dimensional finite element models of edentulous mandible were developed. The models included the combinations of 3.5 and 4.3 mm diameter implants with active and passive thread designs. Vertical, oblique and horizontal loads were applied anterior to the end of the cantilever. Von Mises, maximum principal and minimum principal stresses were analysed. Results The results indicated a tendency towards stress reduction in Von Mises stress values of dental implants with the increase in diameter for both mesial and distal implants. In narrow implants active thread design resulted in lower Von Mises stress values than passive thread design. Active thread design demonstrated higher bone stress when compared to passive thread design. The analysis also revealed the importance of mesial implant for diminishing stresses on the distal implant and their surrounding bone under horizontal and oblique loading. Conclusion The comparison of the models suggest that use of wide implant is advantageous in the all-on-four concept. There is a biomechanical advantage in using narrow implants with active thread design in horizontally inadequate bone. The thread design was more significant in terms of increasing bone stress than implant diameter. The mesial implant influences the biomechanical behavior of the whole design, contributing to a more favorable stress distribution under horizontal and oblique loading conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 108
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Maxillary and mandibular all-on-four implant designs: A review
    Durkan, R.
    Oyar, P.
    Deste, G.
    NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2019, 22 (08) : 1033 - 1040
  • [2] Biomechanical Effects of Bone Atrophy, Implant Design, and Vertical or Tilted of Posterior Implant on All-on-Four Concept Implantation: Finite Element Analysis
    Heng-Li Huang
    Ting-Wei Lin
    Hui-Ling Tsai
    Yu-Ling Wu
    Aaron Yu-Jen Wu
    Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, 2022, 42 : 488 - 497
  • [3] Biomechanical Effects of Bone Atrophy, Implant Design, and Vertical or Tilted of Posterior Implant on All-on-Four Concept Implantation: Finite Element Analysis
    Huang, Heng-Li
    Lin, Ting-Wei
    Tsai, Hui-Ling
    Wu, Yu-Ling
    Wu, Aaron Yu-Jen
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 42 (04) : 488 - 497
  • [4] Biomechanical analysis of immediately loaded implants according to the "All-on-Four" concept
    Horita, Satoshi
    Sugiura, Tsutomu
    Yamamoto, Kazuhiko
    Murakami, Kazuhiro
    Imai, Yuichiro
    Kirita, Tadaaki
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTIC RESEARCH, 2017, 61 (02) : 123 - 132
  • [5] Biomechanical effects of inclined implant shoulder design in all-on-four treatment concept: a three-dimensional finite element analysis
    Aktas, Taha
    Diker, Nurettin
    BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING-BIOMEDIZINISCHE TECHNIK, 2023, 68 (06): : 583 - 591
  • [6] Evaluation of "All-on-Four" Concept and Alternative Designs with 3D Finite Element Analysis Method
    Dogan, Derya Ozdemir
    Polat, Nilufer Tulin
    Polat, Serkan
    Seker, Emre
    Gul, Esma Basak
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (04) : 501 - 510
  • [7] The All-on-Four Treatment Concept: A Systematic Review
    Patzelt, Sebastian B. M.
    Bahat, Oded
    Reynolds, Mark A.
    Strub, Joerg R.
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (06) : 836 - 855
  • [8] Effects of all-on-four implant designs in mandible on implants and the surrounding bone: A 3-D finite element analysis
    Deste, G.
    Durkan, R.
    NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 23 (04) : 456 - 463
  • [9] The Precision of All-on-Four Implant Position Recorded from Three Different CBCT Machines
    Alsulimani, Osamah
    Alhaddad, Abdulrahman
    Altassan, Mosa
    Bukhari, Asmaa
    Munshi, Lulu
    Sabir, Ghalia
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024,
  • [10] Photoelastic analysis of all-on-four concept using different implants angulations for maxilla
    Vemba Cidade, Castelo Pedro
    Pimentel, Marcele Jardim
    do Amaral, Regiane Cristina
    de Arruda Nobilo, Mauro Antonio
    de Albergaria Barbosa, Jose Ricardo
    BRAZILIAN ORAL RESEARCH, 2014, 28 (06): : 478 - 484